Re: Hock : Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:46 am  

I can see positives and negatives to his possible signing.I shall wait for DIM or Jake opinion on it to tell me what to think?

Re: Hock : Sat Oct 14, 2017 8:18 pm  

[quote="craig hkr"]I can see positives and negatives to his possible signing.I shall wait for DIM or Jake opinion on it to tell me what to think?[/quote]

I agree, and talking to Cookie he firmly believes if Hock had remained fit and healthy Leigh would have avoided the drop. Of course, the issue is his temperament not ability. On form he can destroy teams and when he loses it he is a liability. IMO I think Rovers back row needs someone like Hock, who will compliment Lawler's uncompromising style.

Re: Hock : Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:44 am  

Keiththered wrote:

He's hardly a cast off when it was his decision to leave.

Sorry for misleading - it's some of the others i was attempting to describe as cast-offs. Hock left because he wants another year (or two) in SL. Can't blame him for that, and I wish him good luck.

Re: Hock : Sun Oct 15, 2017 6:04 pm  

We need aggressive forwards, but think this penalty machine could be a liability. i don't think we should be interested in any Leigh player. (my opinion).