Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:50 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

Wigan didn't get out of first gear

Hull didn't get out of neutral

Leeds were in reverse on Thursday night.

Top teams can do that

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:55 pm  

Seething

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:09 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Hull didn't get out of neutral

Leeds were in reverse on Thursday night.

Top teams can do that

what gear were wigan in, they must have broken down , both teams tried their hardest , the best team won on the day ,

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:11 pm  

Old faithfull you'll never win at Wollongong !

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:15 pm  

rover 2000 wrote:

the best team won on the day ,

Sure did. As soon as Faraimo went off they knew there would be a weakness down that side and they exploited it., And man, Connor (who isn't particular speedy anyway) and Shaul could get nowhere near Marshall.

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:22 pm  

Hasbag wrote:

Sure did. As soon as Faraimo went off they knew there would be a weakness down that side and they exploited it., And man, Connor (who isn't particular speedy anyway) and Shaul could get nowhere near Marshall.

Who'd have thought the winger has turned out to be the most important player on the pitch maybe if Radford had a plan B apart from load a team up with 17 18st players you might be able cover losing a winger

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:59 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

Who'd have thought the winger has turned out to be the most important player on the pitch maybe if Radford had a plan B apart from load a team up with 17 18st players you might be able cover losing a winger

In those hot and humid conditions it would seem a sensible options to have a bench of 4 forwards as they would need more rotation.
Rovers had a bench on Thursday night of Lunt, Wayne, Kavanagh and Masoe. You lost Heffernan in the backs and didn't score a try after that, but conceded 3 to the opposite centre. Where was Sheens' plan B?

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:31 pm  

Hasbag wrote:

In those hot and humid conditions it would seem a sensible options to have a bench of 4 forwards as they would need more rotation.
Rovers had a bench on Thursday night of Lunt, Wayne, Kavanagh and Masoe. You lost Heffernan in the backs and didn't score a try after that, but conceded 3 to the opposite centre. Where was Sheens' plan B?

We had a back on the bench against Wakefield and scored 1 try what's your point plus Blair can drop in at centre on the plus side for you the NRL teams won't be sniffing round your players after today

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:46 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

We had a back on the bench against Wakefield and scored 1 try what's your point plus Blair can drop in at centre on the plus side for you the NRL teams won't be sniffing round your players after today

My point is that you've tried to have a pop at Radford, but Rovers came unstuck against Leeds exactly the same way Hull did today. I imagine you didn't complain about Sheens for lacking a plan B.
Blair clearly can drop in at centre with about the same quality Washbrook can. He let Keinhorst waltz past him 3 times.
While I don't want any of our players to go to NRL (and it's obvious you're only just trying to have another dig), clubs don't decide to sign/not sign players on the basis of 1 game.

Re: Leeds : Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:55 pm  

Hasbag wrote:

In those hot and humid conditions it would seem a sensible options to have a bench of 4 forwards as they would need more rotation.
Rovers had a bench on Thursday night of Lunt, Wayne, Kavanagh and Masoe. You lost Heffernan in the backs and didn't score a try after that, but conceded 3 to the opposite centre. Where was Sheens' plan B?

radford hasn't written it for him yet