Mintball wrote:
Raises an interesting point – and one that Jerry has raised more than a few times here.
If that incident was, say, a goosing, is it yet another illustration of how attitudes have changed over the last, say, 40 years?
And is it right to be prosecuting cases on the basis of changed attitudes in the here and now?
I personally think that that is a very dangerous road to go down, what is considered to be a sexual assault today was, in the 1970s, for some men at least (and not insignificant in number), a "playful" nip or pat on the booty which may or may not have earned them a slap on the face - often not.
At least one of the allegations mentioned on radio news today states that one of the accusers felt in fear of being raped in a dressing room, which is something more serious, but working in an office from 1974 with what was described as a "dolly bird" receptionist (how quaint), I can certainly confirm that if the same thing was occurring today she would have a huge list of complaints for sexual harassment from our electricians every time they came into the office - she didn't complain and gave as good as she got back to them, with hindsight I don't know whether she ever felt uncomfortable or in fear but she didn't show it if so.
And of course you yourself as a young hack know all about trying to break into an all male "club" and probably having to put up with verbal abuse that would get the offender sacked today ?