FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Medical training turns you into a "vile" monster
::Off-topic discussion.
Ajw71 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1978No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 23 200619 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
19th Dec 23 20:2714th Dec 19 14:13LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

JerryChicken wrote:
I think you're missing the point somewhat and unfortunately its also a point that many politicians miss and what causes "normal" people to believe that they are out of touch with reality - that is that there are millions of hard working parents who are on, or near to, the minimum wage and for whom working 40 hours a week means a gross income (BEFORE deductions) of £247 per week.

Even with just two children and a partner working part time a family on that level of income just does not have any spare cash at the end of EVERY week to put money into savings or expensive income protection insurance policies (and they are expensive, believe me) - to use your example if that family wanted to pay into a cash ISA and use their maximum tax free allowance each year they would have to find £110.76 PER WEEK in order to save £5760 "for a rainy day", that fund would provide the same level of income for the main breadwinner for 23 weeks if they were suddenly jobless (keeping the figures nice and simple without regard to interest rates or tax, NIS etc).

You simply cannot take £110 out of a pay packet of £247 EVERY week.

Of course that is where tax credits kick in, and housing benefits (if in rented accommodation, if not then tough) and without them most of the millions of families that I speak of would be destitute.

That is the reality even for small families and its far, far too easy for critics to point and sneer and spout garbage such as "don't have children then" or "cut out the beer, fags and bingo" or "benefit dependent culture" whereas in reality those critics, including members of parliament, have not the first idea of what life for millions of low waged is like and flipant replies like "Get an insurance policy" or "Put money in an ISA" show a level of ignorance that is staggering.


No no no. Every single excuse to not make the welfare state fairer. Every single alternative rubbished.

Do you even know what it is like to live the way you describe?

This article has it right.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brend ... ct-it-has/

"These unloved fighters for the right of poor folk to receive money and comfort from the state have come up with all sorts of theories to explain the poor's failure to get off their lardy derrières and defend welfarism. Their favourite is the idea that poor folk, being a bit dim and all, have been brainwashed by "scrounger"-hating tabloid newspapers. As a result of political-class diktat and media messaging, these dimwits have apparently "internalised a Thatcherite every-man-for-himself mentality".

Pure ideology I'm afraid. Can't see past your left wing views.
JerryChicken wrote:
I think you're missing the point somewhat and unfortunately its also a point that many politicians miss and what causes "normal" people to believe that they are out of touch with reality - that is that there are millions of hard working parents who are on, or near to, the minimum wage and for whom working 40 hours a week means a gross income (BEFORE deductions) of £247 per week.

Even with just two children and a partner working part time a family on that level of income just does not have any spare cash at the end of EVERY week to put money into savings or expensive income protection insurance policies (and they are expensive, believe me) - to use your example if that family wanted to pay into a cash ISA and use their maximum tax free allowance each year they would have to find £110.76 PER WEEK in order to save £5760 "for a rainy day", that fund would provide the same level of income for the main breadwinner for 23 weeks if they were suddenly jobless (keeping the figures nice and simple without regard to interest rates or tax, NIS etc).

You simply cannot take £110 out of a pay packet of £247 EVERY week.

Of course that is where tax credits kick in, and housing benefits (if in rented accommodation, if not then tough) and without them most of the millions of families that I speak of would be destitute.

That is the reality even for small families and its far, far too easy for critics to point and sneer and spout garbage such as "don't have children then" or "cut out the beer, fags and bingo" or "benefit dependent culture" whereas in reality those critics, including members of parliament, have not the first idea of what life for millions of low waged is like and flipant replies like "Get an insurance policy" or "Put money in an ISA" show a level of ignorance that is staggering.


No no no. Every single excuse to not make the welfare state fairer. Every single alternative rubbished.

Do you even know what it is like to live the way you describe?

This article has it right.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brend ... ct-it-has/

"These unloved fighters for the right of poor folk to receive money and comfort from the state have come up with all sorts of theories to explain the poor's failure to get off their lardy derrières and defend welfarism. Their favourite is the idea that poor folk, being a bit dim and all, have been brainwashed by "scrounger"-hating tabloid newspapers. As a result of political-class diktat and media messaging, these dimwits have apparently "internalised a Thatcherite every-man-for-himself mentality".

Pure ideology I'm afraid. Can't see past your left wing views.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Ajw71 wrote:
No no no. Every single excuse to not make the welfare state fairer. Every single alternative rubbished.

Do you even know what it is like to live the way you describe?

This article has it right.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brend ... ct-it-has/

"These unloved fighters for the right of poor folk to receive money and comfort from the state have come up with all sorts of theories to explain the poor's failure to get off their lardy derrières and defend welfarism. Their favourite is the idea that poor folk, being a bit dim and all, have been brainwashed by "scrounger"-hating tabloid newspapers. As a result of political-class diktat and media messaging, these dimwits have apparently "internalised a Thatcherite every-man-for-himself mentality".

Pure ideology I'm afraid. Can't see past your left wing views.


Sorry, have you explained to me how to save £110 a week for a rainy day out of a wage packet of less than £250 (before tax) yet ?

No ?

You just don't understand do you.

And to answer your question, yes I have experienced a 70% DECREASE in the household income in April 2009 and for 12 months we lived to that budget, it was very tough and our remaining income was actually much higher than a minimum waged employee so fook knows what it must be like to live on £247 (gross) a week - even on our income having one wage earner in an adult family of four it was impossible to budget "for a rainy day" or even to continue with extravagances like life insurance - to suggest that anyone on an even lower incoe than we were then should budget for income protection insurance or saving in cash ISA's is just hilarious and exposes a huge gaping void in your life experiences if you truly believe that that should be so.

Given your tender age and obvious lack of such experiences I shouldn't be surprised though, unfortunately the ones in power who think the same way have no such excuse other than they were born that way and have no desire to look around ...
Ajw71 wrote:
No no no. Every single excuse to not make the welfare state fairer. Every single alternative rubbished.

Do you even know what it is like to live the way you describe?

This article has it right.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brend ... ct-it-has/

"These unloved fighters for the right of poor folk to receive money and comfort from the state have come up with all sorts of theories to explain the poor's failure to get off their lardy derrières and defend welfarism. Their favourite is the idea that poor folk, being a bit dim and all, have been brainwashed by "scrounger"-hating tabloid newspapers. As a result of political-class diktat and media messaging, these dimwits have apparently "internalised a Thatcherite every-man-for-himself mentality".

Pure ideology I'm afraid. Can't see past your left wing views.


Sorry, have you explained to me how to save £110 a week for a rainy day out of a wage packet of less than £250 (before tax) yet ?

No ?

You just don't understand do you.

And to answer your question, yes I have experienced a 70% DECREASE in the household income in April 2009 and for 12 months we lived to that budget, it was very tough and our remaining income was actually much higher than a minimum waged employee so fook knows what it must be like to live on £247 (gross) a week - even on our income having one wage earner in an adult family of four it was impossible to budget "for a rainy day" or even to continue with extravagances like life insurance - to suggest that anyone on an even lower incoe than we were then should budget for income protection insurance or saving in cash ISA's is just hilarious and exposes a huge gaping void in your life experiences if you truly believe that that should be so.

Given your tender age and obvious lack of such experiences I shouldn't be surprised though, unfortunately the ones in power who think the same way have no such excuse other than they were born that way and have no desire to look around ...
Ajw71 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1978No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 23 200619 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
19th Dec 23 20:2714th Dec 19 14:13LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

JerryChicken wrote:
Sorry, have you explained to me how to save £110 a week for a rainy day out of a wage packet of less than £250 (before tax) yet ?

No ?

You just don't understand do you.

And to answer your question, yes I have experienced a 70% DECREASE in the household income in April 2009 and for 12 months we lived to that budget, it was very tough and our remaining income was actually much higher than a minimum waged employee so fook knows what it must be like to live on £247 (gross) a week - even on our income having one wage earner in an adult family of four it was impossible to budget "for a rainy day" or even to continue with extravagances like life insurance - to suggest that anyone on an even lower incoe than we were then should budget for income protection insurance or saving in cash ISA's is just hilarious and exposes a huge gaping void in your life experiences if you truly believe that that should be so.

Given your tender age and obvious lack of such experiences I shouldn't be surprised though, unfortunately the ones in power who think the same way have no such excuse other than they were born that way and have no desire to look around ...



You just don't understand that the welfare state is in need of reform, and these changes are actually backed by public opinion.

Look at the opinions. They speak for themselves.

http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/d ... 120130.pdf

74% agree that the the government pays out too much in benefits and that welfare levels overall should be reduced.
JerryChicken wrote:
Sorry, have you explained to me how to save £110 a week for a rainy day out of a wage packet of less than £250 (before tax) yet ?

No ?

You just don't understand do you.

And to answer your question, yes I have experienced a 70% DECREASE in the household income in April 2009 and for 12 months we lived to that budget, it was very tough and our remaining income was actually much higher than a minimum waged employee so fook knows what it must be like to live on £247 (gross) a week - even on our income having one wage earner in an adult family of four it was impossible to budget "for a rainy day" or even to continue with extravagances like life insurance - to suggest that anyone on an even lower incoe than we were then should budget for income protection insurance or saving in cash ISA's is just hilarious and exposes a huge gaping void in your life experiences if you truly believe that that should be so.

Given your tender age and obvious lack of such experiences I shouldn't be surprised though, unfortunately the ones in power who think the same way have no such excuse other than they were born that way and have no desire to look around ...



You just don't understand that the welfare state is in need of reform, and these changes are actually backed by public opinion.

Look at the opinions. They speak for themselves.

http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/d ... 120130.pdf

74% agree that the the government pays out too much in benefits and that welfare levels overall should be reduced.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach4063
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 05 200520 years215th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Oct 24 10:1212th Oct 24 19:01LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Cheshire

http://newsthump.com/2013/04/06/george- ... upporters/

This made me giggle

“Do you know the difference between an inheritance recipient and a welfare recipient?”

“One is a scrounger content to live off the hard work of others without event having had a proper job in their lives, and the other one is poor.”

:lol:
http://newsthump.com/2013/04/06/george- ... upporters/

This made me giggle

“Do you know the difference between an inheritance recipient and a welfare recipient?”

“One is a scrounger content to live off the hard work of others without event having had a proper job in their lives, and the other one is poor.”

:lol:
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Ajw71 wrote:

74% agree that the the government pays out too much in benefits and that welfare levels overall should be reduced.


And I'll wager that those 74% all believe that they were polling to get people to work for money instead of "sitting at home watching Jeremy Kyle and eating Greggs pasties", whereas the truth is that a huge proportion of the benefits bill goes to those who are in work, or the state pension.

How do you square that circle - got another poll for in-work benefits and pensions ?
Kosh 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator36786
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 31 200321 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Aug 24 20:266th May 23 08:43LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Signature
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Moderator

Ajw71 wrote:
You just don't understand that the welfare state is in need of reform, and these changes are actually backed by public opinion.

Look at the opinions. They speak for themselves.

http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/d ... 120130.pdf

74% agree that the the government pays out too much in benefits and that welfare levels overall should be reduced.

You realise that survey is over a year old, right?

And given that a majority of the sample vastly overestimated fraudulent claim levels it's no wonder they were all for cutting benefits. I'd guess most of them didn't realise that most benefits are paid out to working families either.
Ajw71 wrote:
You just don't understand that the welfare state is in need of reform, and these changes are actually backed by public opinion.

Look at the opinions. They speak for themselves.

http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/d ... 120130.pdf

74% agree that the the government pays out too much in benefits and that welfare levels overall should be reduced.

You realise that survey is over a year old, right?

And given that a majority of the sample vastly overestimated fraudulent claim levels it's no wonder they were all for cutting benefits. I'd guess most of them didn't realise that most benefits are paid out to working families either.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels14522No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 26 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
30th Jan 14 14:039th Jan 14 11:22LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Online
Signature
Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice.
Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.

Ajw71 wrote:
No no no. Every single excuse to not make the welfare state fairer. Every single alternative rubbished...

So far you have come up with "get some insurance" and "invest in an ISA". :CRAZY:

There's a job waiting for you at Conservative central office, they'd love your brand of blue-sky-vacuity there.

... and to think, you accuse others of not being able to see past their ideology.
Ajw71 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1978No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 23 200619 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
19th Dec 23 20:2714th Dec 19 14:13LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Kosh wrote:
You realise that survey is over a year old, right?

And given that a majority of the sample vastly overestimated fraudulent claim levels it's no wonder they were all for cutting benefits. I'd guess most of them didn't realise that most benefits are paid out to working families either.


Try and twist facts all you want. They are there for all to see.

The public support the reform.
Ajw71 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1978No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 23 200619 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
19th Dec 23 20:2714th Dec 19 14:13LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

El Barbudo wrote:
So far you have come up with "get some insurance" and "invest in an ISA". :CRAZY:

There's a job waiting for you at Conservative central office, they'd love your brand of blue-sky-vacuity there.

... and to think, you accuse others of not being able to see past their ideology.


You and your extreme socialist friends are in a minority.

The reform is happening. Get over it.
Kosh 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator36786
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 31 200321 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Aug 24 20:266th May 23 08:43LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Signature
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Moderator

Ajw71 wrote:
Try and twist facts all you want. They are there for all to see.

The public support the reform.

I twisted no facts. I pointed out the age of the poll and passed an opinion on some of the data. I didn't even contest the point about majority support - it's not exactly fresh information after all. No need to get all defensive.

The only poll that really counts is the one to be held in a couple of years time. By then a fair few of the respondents to that survey will have realised that they are directly affected by the reduction in benefits and that by implication this Government and its supporters consider them to be scroungers - regardless of how hard working they might be. I suspect this may sway their opinion somewhat.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 187 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
12m
Film game
Boss Hog
5996
14m
Refs referring it to video as a try or not
Smiffy27
39
25m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Douglas Blac
3
31m
IMG scores
PopTart
263
33m
Transfer Talk V5
ArthurClues
561
37m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
43m
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
Recent
Super League
FIL
33
Recent
New Players
BigTime
150
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
UllFC
4064
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Douglas Blac
3
2m
2024 l Academy Scholarship & Reserves News
ArthurClues
224
2m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
3m
Rumours and signings v9
Big Steve
28923
3m
Planning for next season
Binosh
201
3m
Getting a new side to gel
Bullseye
13
3m
Film game
Boss Hog
5996
3m
IMG Score
Clickin'knee
84
3m
IMG scores
PopTart
263
3m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
TODAY
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
12m
Film game
Boss Hog
5996
14m
Refs referring it to video as a try or not
Smiffy27
39
25m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Douglas Blac
3
31m
IMG scores
PopTart
263
33m
Transfer Talk V5
ArthurClues
561
37m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
43m
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
Recent
Super League
FIL
33
Recent
New Players
BigTime
150
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
UllFC
4064
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Douglas Blac
3
2m
2024 l Academy Scholarship & Reserves News
ArthurClues
224
2m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
3m
Rumours and signings v9
Big Steve
28923
3m
Planning for next season
Binosh
201
3m
Getting a new side to gel
Bullseye
13
3m
Film game
Boss Hog
5996
3m
IMG Score
Clickin'knee
84
3m
IMG scores
PopTart
263
3m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
TODAY
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!