Big Graeme wrote:
I fail to see the scandal, EE have unused bandwidth so are using it for 4g, not their fault others have used up their space.
EE's spare bandwidth came about because they merged two big networks to create the biggest mobile network in this country. OFCOM are then allowing the biggest network to launch 4g with the iPhone 5, Galaxy S3 and Nokia Lumia 920 months ahead of the bandwidth auction that will allow the other networks into the market.
It's anti competitive as they've just handed EE, already the biggest network, an enormous leg up on the other networks.
Would delaying EE's launch until 2013 not have been fairer?
OFCOM are there to prevent such things surely?
Vodafone wrote:
We are frankly shocked that Ofcom has reached this decision, the regulator has shown a careless disregard for the best interests of consumers, business and the wider economy through its refusal to properly regard the competitive distortion created by allowing one operator to run services before the ground has been laid for a fully competitive market.
I agree with the other networks. They didn't create the spare capacity through investment, they did it through being the biggest. They are now going to go from the biggest network to being the dominant network. I think it's clearly harmful for competition in the market, as they could easily charge £60 per month and people would still flock to it as it's the only network with 4g.