Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:47 am  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Ha ha Pinky you should consider stand up, you're hilarious without even knowing you are.

Still no comment on your made up quote then? Shame.

[Wanderer]

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 1:01 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Trying to poke a stick again, typical troll. Listen to Sky news, you'll get a plethora of news fit for you on there.

You're so misinformed kid.

As someone who likes a bet, I'll wager he's not been called that for many a year.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:46 pm  

Nice one Wanderer ... cheeky monkey!
When I saw you had posted on here I thought it would be to lock it ...

But to avoid that, I will pose a serious question to our 'informed friend'.
Yes ...I can see that a media outlet can fashion a broadcast if indeed they could be arsed or say were being controlled externally or from above.
But I cannot for the life of me see how they can control what is coming via mobile phone footage.
Mobile phone footage by the way that is supporting that what just happened was... true!
Not showing it up as conspiracy.

So which superbeing is controlling and censoring that?

Do you just ignore private footage?

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 7:00 pm  

Stand-Offish wrote:

Nice one Wanderer ... cheeky monkey!
When I saw you had posted on here I thought it would be to lock it ...

But to avoid that, I will pose a serious question to our 'informed friend'.
Yes ...I can see that a media outlet can fashion a broadcast if indeed they could be arsed or say were being controlled externally or from above.
But I cannot for the life of me see how they can control what is coming via mobile phone footage.
Mobile phone footage by the way that is supporting that what just happened was... true!
Not showing it up as conspiracy.

So which superbeing is controlling and censoring that?

Do you just ignore private footage?

Do you know the difference between a hoax and a false flag.?

From footage i've seen so far in Paris its definitely a false flag, however boston, charlie Hebdo and sandy hook was hoaxes. Theres a massive difference between the two.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 8:25 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Do you know the difference between a hoax and a false flag.?

From footage i've seen so far in Paris its definitely a false flag, however boston, charlie Hebdo and sandy hook was hoaxes. Theres a massive difference between the two.

So come on then .... who done it?(sic)

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:01 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Do you know the difference between a hoax and a false flag.?

From footage i've seen so far in Paris its definitely a false flag, however boston, charlie Hebdo and sandy hook was hoaxes. Theres a massive difference between the two.

No, a step too far! Please choose other ways of voicing your displeasure. - Wanderer.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:59 pm  

King Street Cat wrote:

What a loving dick head! You don't even know what day it is you loving retard!

Couldn't agree more KSC

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 10:11 pm  

No no, give him a chance to say who really did this outrage.
I mean, we have dead bodies and prisoners and oodles of footage and testimony ...and he has?
A notion?

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 11:34 pm  

FFS! If you've enough interest in the case to keep asking him questions then you really have no excuses for not investigating it yourself. Surely an hour or two away from jerking off over god knows what one evening isn't going to kill you.

I'd like to offer an opinion but the truth is I really don't know anything about the case. Aside from catching the first ten minutes or so on the news that evening I've paid almost no attention whatsoever.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 21, 2015 11:48 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

FFS! If you've enough interest in the case to keep asking him questions then you really have no excuses for not investigating it yourself. Surely an hour or two away from jerking off over god knows what one evening isn't going to kill you.

I'd like to offer an opinion but the truth is I really don't know anything about the case. Aside from catching the first ten minutes or so on the news that evening I've paid almost no attention whatsoever.

Have you not realised? Nobody is asking him questions seriously. They're merely taking the mickey out of him because he's an absolute fruitcake. Do you really think anyone is remotely interested in wasting their time researching all this false flag hoax nonsense Flat Face Stanley keeps preaching?! In the immortal words of Rory Breaker "he must be more stupid than you Lenny!"