|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I was saddened to learn yesterday that adults in residential care receive benefit of just £22 per week for all their other needs - entertainment, treats, clothes, etc, etc. That's year in year out for mayve 60 or 70 years. OK they get food, shelter and care but the care homes have to try to get second hand clothes, etc for them. I think it's really sad that such a rich country couldn't find the cash to help the most vulnerable have a little more in life, when there is such enormous waste of public funds, eg they keep spending money on our railway station and making it worse. They have put in barriers - which make life more inconvenient for users, they now pay two blokes to stand watching people go through and after about 7pm they are left open anyway. What a waste - serves absoluetely no purpose - certainly not an improvement for customers and certainly not justified by an perceived protection of revenue. They built an identikit, hideous glass extension to the villagey station building to house the barriers (when the actual building has a plaque commerorating its award for sympathetic architectural revedelopment. Network Rail and First Capital Connect are a joke, they waste billions and can't run a half decent railway. Yet people in need are treated so badly. We live in a sick society that needs to get its priorities right. These rail people get bonuses too and some are amazingly well paid - why? 150 years of trying and the railways are worse than ever. Reward for failure seems the thing in modern Britain.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 2359 | Coventry Bears |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2021 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote Dally="Dally"I was saddened to learn yesterday that adults in residential care receive benefit of just £22 per week for all their other needs - entertainment, treats, clothes, etc, etc. That's year in year out for mayve 60 or 70 years. OK they get food, shelter and care but the care homes have to try to get second hand clothes, etc for them. I think it's really sad that such a rich country couldn't find the cash to help the most vulnerable have a little more in life, when there is such enormous waste of public funds, eg they keep spending money on our railway station and making it worse. They have put in barriers - which make life more inconvenient for users, they now pay two blokes to stand watching people go through and after about 7pm they are left open anyway. What a waste - serves absoluetely no purpose - certainly not an improvement for customers and certainly not justified by an perceived protection of revenue. They built an identikit, hideous glass extension to the villagey station building to house the barriers (when the actual building has a plaque commerorating its award for sympathetic architectural revedelopment. Network Rail and First Capital Connect are a joke, they waste billions and can't run a half decent railway. Yet people in need are treated so badly. We live in a sick society that needs to get its priorities right. These rail people get bonuses too and some are amazingly well paid - why? 150 years of trying and the railways are worse than ever. Reward for failure seems the thing in modern Britain.'"
Also, to add to that, this government voted for the removal of the mobility component of DLA for adults in residential care even though they were fully entitled to it. They ended up having to do a complete U turn (like most other things they are proposing nowadays).
Utterly dispicable.
www.guardian.co.uk/society/joepu ... just-start
|
|
Quote Dally="Dally"I was saddened to learn yesterday that adults in residential care receive benefit of just £22 per week for all their other needs - entertainment, treats, clothes, etc, etc. That's year in year out for mayve 60 or 70 years. OK they get food, shelter and care but the care homes have to try to get second hand clothes, etc for them. I think it's really sad that such a rich country couldn't find the cash to help the most vulnerable have a little more in life, when there is such enormous waste of public funds, eg they keep spending money on our railway station and making it worse. They have put in barriers - which make life more inconvenient for users, they now pay two blokes to stand watching people go through and after about 7pm they are left open anyway. What a waste - serves absoluetely no purpose - certainly not an improvement for customers and certainly not justified by an perceived protection of revenue. They built an identikit, hideous glass extension to the villagey station building to house the barriers (when the actual building has a plaque commerorating its award for sympathetic architectural revedelopment. Network Rail and First Capital Connect are a joke, they waste billions and can't run a half decent railway. Yet people in need are treated so badly. We live in a sick society that needs to get its priorities right. These rail people get bonuses too and some are amazingly well paid - why? 150 years of trying and the railways are worse than ever. Reward for failure seems the thing in modern Britain.'"
Also, to add to that, this government voted for the removal of the mobility component of DLA for adults in residential care even though they were fully entitled to it. They ended up having to do a complete U turn (like most other things they are proposing nowadays).
Utterly dispicable.
www.guardian.co.uk/society/joepu ... just-start
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 37704 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Aplogies for the link, I blame Caroline Lucas for it was she who sent it.
[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099940/NHS-health-reforms-Extent-McKinsey--Companys-role-Andrew-Lansleys-proposals.htmlMackinsey appear to have an unduly active role in the planning of the NHS Bill[/url
Former McKinsey execs also seem to abound in the top echelons of Monitor, the NHS Regulator. McKinsey’s involvement in the Bill is so great that its executives attend the meetings of the ‘Extraordinary NHS Management Board’ convened to implement it. Sometimes McKinsey even hosts these meetings at its UK headquarters in Jermyn Street, Central London.
And while we're on about it, from the same rag:
[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099914/NHS-reforms-David-Cameron-lashes-Cabinet-stabbers-support-Andrew-Lansley.htmlWe shed blood on our NHS reforms: Table-thumping Cameron lashes out at Cabinet back-stabbers and vows there won't be a U-turn[/url
Shed blood? Not nearly as much as the electorate will be shedding once these proposals go through. And then there's the haemorrhaging of taxpayers' dosh into the coffers of cn[iu[/its lilke McKinsey.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1487 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 47951 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Jul 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
No. But it's a damned important statement.
|
|
No. But it's a damned important statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 16301 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Interesting on productivity how nobody questions whether the Armed Forces productivity ever falls.
Where is the accountability on them? How does the taxpayer know they get value for money?
All we ever get told is "the best in the world". By what standings?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote sally cinnamon="sally cinnamon"Interesting on productivity how nobody questions whether the Armed Forces productivity ever falls.
Where is the accountability on them? How does the taxpayer know they get value for money?
All we ever get told is "the best in the world". By what standings?'"
Should productivity perhaps be calculated by reference to how many "enemy" they take out? If so, I reckon they're not as good as they used to be!
The USA certainly don't think our army is the best in the world. In fact, quite the opposite judging by Afghanistan.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1487 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote sally cinnamon="sally cinnamon"Interesting on productivity how nobody questions whether the Armed Forces productivity ever falls.
Where is the accountability on them? How does the taxpayer know they get value for money?
All we ever get told is "the best in the world". By what standings?'"
Maybe it goes on how much we spend per kill in comparison to other armies and relative to the amount spent by opposing armies, which is obviously intrinsically linked. I am sure some has worked out an equation for it.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Dally="Dally"Should productivity perhaps be calculated by reference to how many "enemy" they take out? If so, I reckon they're not as good as they used to be!
The USA certainly don't think our army is the best in the world. In fact, quite the opposite judging by Afghanistan.'"
Hmmm and plenty of Brits serving in Afghanistan think the US Army is technologically amazing but staffed by overly aggressive idiotic gun-toting maniacs and that the US Army should spend more time on avoiding blowing up innocent civilians and allied soldiers and less time slagging off another nations armed forces.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 47951 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Jul 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Him="Him"Hmmm and plenty of Brits serving in Afghanistan think the US Army is technologically amazing but staffed by overly aggressive idiotic gun-toting maniacs and that the US Army should spend more time on avoiding blowing up innocent civilians and allied soldiers and less time slagging off another nations armed forces.'"
That just made me laugh, nod and applaud all at the same time. Which is some example of multi-tasking.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Him="Him"Hmmm and plenty of Brits serving in Afghanistan think the US Army is technologically amazing but staffed by overly aggressive idiotic gun-toting maniacs and that the US Army should spend more time on avoiding blowing up innocent civilians and allied soldiers and less time slagging off another nations armed forces.'"
Another Little Englander speaks.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 37704 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| If Labour don't keep up the pressure on this pig's ear of a piece of legislation, they don't deserve anyone's vote
|
|
|
 |
|