FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Night Sky
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11924
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 15 200717 years178th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
15th Jun 24 13:253rd Jun 24 01:02LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
Signature
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.

Frederick Douglas

Re: Night Sky : Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:52 pm  
I was having self esteem issues before reading these recent posts, now I can add feelings of utter inconsequentiality.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member27757No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
8th Jan 21 14:1929th May 18 16:25LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In rocket surgery
Signature
An Ode to Sepp Blatter

Dadbod

Next In Line To The Throne

St Helens and a Fitting End to a Season of Unsung Heroes

Follow my wisdom on Twitter

Top 100 films of the 00s - The Top 5

Re: Night Sky : Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:17 pm  
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member27757No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
8th Jan 21 14:1929th May 18 16:25LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In rocket surgery
Signature
An Ode to Sepp Blatter

Dadbod

Next In Line To The Throne

St Helens and a Fitting End to a Season of Unsung Heroes

Follow my wisdom on Twitter

Top 100 films of the 00s - The Top 5

Re: Night Sky : Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:06 am  
After what we mentioned a few weeks ago.

Is the Big Bang theory a mistake?

http://iai.tv/video/bang-goes-the-big-bang
After what we mentioned a few weeks ago.

Is the Big Bang theory a mistake?

http://iai.tv/video/bang-goes-the-big-bang
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200222 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: Night Sky : Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:44 am  
I wouldn't call it a mistake, as first it fits most observed and observable evidence, and second is just that, a theory, albeit a scientific and rigorously explored, addressed and investigated theory.

Also because the phrase "Big Bang" is just a simplistic analogy based on what happens in normal explosions with which we are all familiar, but unfortunately the true "appearance" of a theoretical Big Bang isn't something our brains are capable of visualising; in any explosion, there is an outisde space, and something within it explodes, and the bits fly out. But in this case, the whole point is that ther WAS no "outside". The expanding Universe is all there is. Certainly from our perspective.

After a while, thinking this over does your head in: if the Universe is infinite, how can it be "expanding"? If it all appeared out of nothing, where does all the something come from? And of course wtf is 95% of it, anyway?

It's just as it should be that many clever people challenge and investigate BB theory, but the thing is that I don't have any perception of any clique or class of scientists who would stubbornly cling to the existing BB theory despite any evidence or alternative theories to any contrary explanation, on this one, I think they all just want to know and it is not a "closed minds" scenario.

We don't know much, but what we do know has such weird and magical elements all over the place that nothing would surprise me. For example, do black holes exist? Maybe not, not in the way we popularly know them, anyway. We are all familiar with the "event horizon", notionally a boundary which if you cross, nothing can escape, as the black hole's gravity is too strong. But this turns out to be a fallacy, it turns out that you could fly your spaceship beyond the event horizon, then turn round and emerge safely - as long as you had enough petrol! It's objects travelling through space which don't have a propellant - even light - that can't escape beyond a certain point, but they could if they had engines to assist them.

And it's a fuzzy boundary too, all scientists are familiar with matter and anti-matter pairs (these pop into existence from an apparent nowhere all the time, then annihilate each other (cancel each other out) and so disappear again. (Where do they come from, and how TF does that work? But it's a strange bit of factual knowledge that we have learned and is now trite. Did you now, for example that in hospitals, radioactive molecules that emit anti-matter particles are used for imaging in a technique known as positron emission tomography?).

Then you have entangled particle pairs, which "know" what is happening to each other even at great distance. That is, nothing can travel faster than light. But however far you separate entangled pairs, an action on one is simultaneously mirrored in the other. That is, there is no communication lag. At all. It happens at the same time.

But if you have an entangled pair pop into creation near a black hole at the margins, what if one particle can escape the black hole but the other is drawn in? We should therefore be able to detect these "orphan" particles being "emitted" from the area around the black hole!

And we don't even know the full collection of atomic particles. Why, two more were discovered only yesterday!

An intriguing article:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... astronomy/

Speaking of particles, of course a microscope can only see to a certain small size limit, after which optics obviously fail. Right? Nope. Betzig, Moerner and Hell have won this year's Nobel prize in chemistry for the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy, which for the first time allows us to actually watch nanoscale things like watching individual memories forming in brain cells. Stuff like this apart from being gobsmackingly brilliant, teachs me never to say never!
Image
Nuclear envelope of a cell breaking open for cell division
I wouldn't call it a mistake, as first it fits most observed and observable evidence, and second is just that, a theory, albeit a scientific and rigorously explored, addressed and investigated theory.

Also because the phrase "Big Bang" is just a simplistic analogy based on what happens in normal explosions with which we are all familiar, but unfortunately the true "appearance" of a theoretical Big Bang isn't something our brains are capable of visualising; in any explosion, there is an outisde space, and something within it explodes, and the bits fly out. But in this case, the whole point is that ther WAS no "outside". The expanding Universe is all there is. Certainly from our perspective.

After a while, thinking this over does your head in: if the Universe is infinite, how can it be "expanding"? If it all appeared out of nothing, where does all the something come from? And of course wtf is 95% of it, anyway?

It's just as it should be that many clever people challenge and investigate BB theory, but the thing is that I don't have any perception of any clique or class of scientists who would stubbornly cling to the existing BB theory despite any evidence or alternative theories to any contrary explanation, on this one, I think they all just want to know and it is not a "closed minds" scenario.

We don't know much, but what we do know has such weird and magical elements all over the place that nothing would surprise me. For example, do black holes exist? Maybe not, not in the way we popularly know them, anyway. We are all familiar with the "event horizon", notionally a boundary which if you cross, nothing can escape, as the black hole's gravity is too strong. But this turns out to be a fallacy, it turns out that you could fly your spaceship beyond the event horizon, then turn round and emerge safely - as long as you had enough petrol! It's objects travelling through space which don't have a propellant - even light - that can't escape beyond a certain point, but they could if they had engines to assist them.

And it's a fuzzy boundary too, all scientists are familiar with matter and anti-matter pairs (these pop into existence from an apparent nowhere all the time, then annihilate each other (cancel each other out) and so disappear again. (Where do they come from, and how TF does that work? But it's a strange bit of factual knowledge that we have learned and is now trite. Did you now, for example that in hospitals, radioactive molecules that emit anti-matter particles are used for imaging in a technique known as positron emission tomography?).

Then you have entangled particle pairs, which "know" what is happening to each other even at great distance. That is, nothing can travel faster than light. But however far you separate entangled pairs, an action on one is simultaneously mirrored in the other. That is, there is no communication lag. At all. It happens at the same time.

But if you have an entangled pair pop into creation near a black hole at the margins, what if one particle can escape the black hole but the other is drawn in? We should therefore be able to detect these "orphan" particles being "emitted" from the area around the black hole!

And we don't even know the full collection of atomic particles. Why, two more were discovered only yesterday!

An intriguing article:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... astronomy/

Speaking of particles, of course a microscope can only see to a certain small size limit, after which optics obviously fail. Right? Nope. Betzig, Moerner and Hell have won this year's Nobel prize in chemistry for the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy, which for the first time allows us to actually watch nanoscale things like watching individual memories forming in brain cells. Stuff like this apart from being gobsmackingly brilliant, teachs me never to say never!
Image
Nuclear envelope of a cell breaking open for cell division
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels17898
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 19 200321 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Mar 20 10:2927th Aug 19 12:42LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Packed like sardines, in a tin
Signature
2005 Challenge Cup

To reconcile respect with practicality, what is the optimum speed for a hearse?

Re: Night Sky : Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:24 pm  
McClennan wrote:
Is the Big Bang theory a mistake?

I like it but the one where Raj and Penny slept together was a mistake, I'll grant you :wink:
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach13190No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 05 200717 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
1st Feb 20 09:2114th Oct 19 16:58LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Signature
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'

Yves Le Prieur, the real inventor of the aqualung

Re: Night Sky : Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:21 pm  
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
I wouldn't call it a mistake, as first it fits most observed and observable evidence, and second is just that, a theory, albeit a scientific and rigorously explored, addressed and investigated theory.

Also because the phrase "Big Bang" is just a simplistic analogy based on what happens in normal explosions with which we are all familiar, but unfortunately the true "appearance" of a theoretical Big Bang isn't something our brains are capable of visualising; in any explosion, there is an outisde space, and something within it explodes, and the bits fly out. But in this case, the whole point is that ther WAS no "outside". The expanding Universe is all there is. Certainly from our perspective.

After a while, thinking this over does your head in: if the Universe is infinite, how can it be "expanding"? If it all appeared out of nothing, where does all the something come from? And of course wtf is 95% of it, anyway?

It's just as it should be that many clever people challenge and investigate BB theory, but the thing is that I don't have any perception of any clique or class of scientists who would stubbornly cling to the existing BB theory despite any evidence or alternative theories to any contrary explanation, on this one, I think they all just want to know and it is not a "closed minds" scenario.

We don't know much, but what we do know has such weird and magical elements all over the place that nothing would surprise me. For example, do black holes exist? Maybe not, not in the way we popularly know them, anyway. We are all familiar with the "event horizon", notionally a boundary which if you cross, nothing can escape, as the black hole's gravity is too strong. But this turns out to be a fallacy, it turns out that you could fly your spaceship beyond the event horizon, then turn round and emerge safely - as long as you had enough petrol! It's objects travelling through space which don't have a propellant - even light - that can't escape beyond a certain point, but they could if they had engines to assist them.

And it's a fuzzy boundary too, all scientists are familiar with matter and anti-matter pairs (these pop into existence from an apparent nowhere all the time, then annihilate each other (cancel each other out) and so disappear again. (Where do they come from, and how TF does that work? But it's a strange bit of factual knowledge that we have learned and is now trite. Did you now, for example that in hospitals, radioactive molecules that emit anti-matter particles are used for imaging in a technique known as positron emission tomography?).

Then you have entangled particle pairs, which "know" what is happening to each other even at great distance. That is, nothing can travel faster than light. But however far you separate entangled pairs, an action on one is simultaneously mirrored in the other. That is, there is no communication lag. At all. It happens at the same time.

But if you have an entangled pair pop into creation near a black hole at the margins, what if one particle can escape the black hole but the other is drawn in? We should therefore be able to detect these "orphan" particles being "emitted" from the area around the black hole!

And we don't even know the full collection of atomic particles. Why, two more were discovered only yesterday!

An intriguing article:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... astronomy/

Speaking of particles, of course a microscope can only see to a certain small size limit, after which optics obviously fail. Right? Nope. Betzig, Moerner and Hell have won this year's Nobel prize in chemistry for the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy, which for the first time allows us to actually watch nanoscale things like watching individual memories forming in brain cells. Stuff like this apart from being gobsmackingly brilliant, teachs me never to say never!
Image
Nuclear envelope of a cell breaking open for cell division


Was it with a Macro lens !!!!! :D
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
I wouldn't call it a mistake, as first it fits most observed and observable evidence, and second is just that, a theory, albeit a scientific and rigorously explored, addressed and investigated theory.

Also because the phrase "Big Bang" is just a simplistic analogy based on what happens in normal explosions with which we are all familiar, but unfortunately the true "appearance" of a theoretical Big Bang isn't something our brains are capable of visualising; in any explosion, there is an outisde space, and something within it explodes, and the bits fly out. But in this case, the whole point is that ther WAS no "outside". The expanding Universe is all there is. Certainly from our perspective.

After a while, thinking this over does your head in: if the Universe is infinite, how can it be "expanding"? If it all appeared out of nothing, where does all the something come from? And of course wtf is 95% of it, anyway?

It's just as it should be that many clever people challenge and investigate BB theory, but the thing is that I don't have any perception of any clique or class of scientists who would stubbornly cling to the existing BB theory despite any evidence or alternative theories to any contrary explanation, on this one, I think they all just want to know and it is not a "closed minds" scenario.

We don't know much, but what we do know has such weird and magical elements all over the place that nothing would surprise me. For example, do black holes exist? Maybe not, not in the way we popularly know them, anyway. We are all familiar with the "event horizon", notionally a boundary which if you cross, nothing can escape, as the black hole's gravity is too strong. But this turns out to be a fallacy, it turns out that you could fly your spaceship beyond the event horizon, then turn round and emerge safely - as long as you had enough petrol! It's objects travelling through space which don't have a propellant - even light - that can't escape beyond a certain point, but they could if they had engines to assist them.

And it's a fuzzy boundary too, all scientists are familiar with matter and anti-matter pairs (these pop into existence from an apparent nowhere all the time, then annihilate each other (cancel each other out) and so disappear again. (Where do they come from, and how TF does that work? But it's a strange bit of factual knowledge that we have learned and is now trite. Did you now, for example that in hospitals, radioactive molecules that emit anti-matter particles are used for imaging in a technique known as positron emission tomography?).

Then you have entangled particle pairs, which "know" what is happening to each other even at great distance. That is, nothing can travel faster than light. But however far you separate entangled pairs, an action on one is simultaneously mirrored in the other. That is, there is no communication lag. At all. It happens at the same time.

But if you have an entangled pair pop into creation near a black hole at the margins, what if one particle can escape the black hole but the other is drawn in? We should therefore be able to detect these "orphan" particles being "emitted" from the area around the black hole!

And we don't even know the full collection of atomic particles. Why, two more were discovered only yesterday!

An intriguing article:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... astronomy/

Speaking of particles, of course a microscope can only see to a certain small size limit, after which optics obviously fail. Right? Nope. Betzig, Moerner and Hell have won this year's Nobel prize in chemistry for the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy, which for the first time allows us to actually watch nanoscale things like watching individual memories forming in brain cells. Stuff like this apart from being gobsmackingly brilliant, teachs me never to say never!
Image
Nuclear envelope of a cell breaking open for cell division


Was it with a Macro lens !!!!! :D
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3828
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 26 200519 years296th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jun 24 08:3529th Sep 23 13:31LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In the seaside town ...that they forgot to bomb
Signature
Heath, Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May & BORIS (W.T.F.)

It's Johnson!

Re: Night Sky : Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:25 pm  
Apparently there’s a meteor shower peaking right now, that’s if anyone can see a bit of clear night sky in this Godforsaken country :x .

http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/me ... ionid.html
Apparently there’s a meteor shower peaking right now, that’s if anyone can see a bit of clear night sky in this Godforsaken country :x .

http://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/me ... ionid.html
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200222 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: Night Sky : Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:04 am  
Many parts of the world get to see meteor showers. What do we get? The arrse end of a fscking hurricane. :(
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3828
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 26 200519 years296th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jun 24 08:3529th Sep 23 13:31LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In the seaside town ...that they forgot to bomb
Signature
Heath, Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May & BORIS (W.T.F.)

It's Johnson!

Re: Night Sky : Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:20 pm  
Rosetta live landing in the next hour - hopefully.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/science- ... t-29985988
Rosetta live landing in the next hour - hopefully.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/science- ... t-29985988
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200222 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: Night Sky : Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:37 am  
First image in the history of humanity taken from the surface of a comet

Image

As the harpoons didn't fire, Philae actually "bounced" a couple of times on the surface. The comet's gravity is astonishingly weak, but is there, and so does attract Philae, however tenuously. It's settled now, and tweeted:
Philae Lander ✔ @Philae2014
Follow
Hello! An update on life on #67P - Yesterday was exhausting! I actually performed 3 landings,15:33, 17:26 & 17:33 UTC. Stay tuned for more


A full panorama from Philae will be revealed at the press conference 1pm today and will be put up on the ESA site

Compared with the moon landings, I'm a bit peeved actually at how many people don't give a fsck about this, and equally how few even have a clue as to what an absolutely astonishing, mind-blowing achievement this is. Shame how the world has dumbed-down.
First image in the history of humanity taken from the surface of a comet

Image

As the harpoons didn't fire, Philae actually "bounced" a couple of times on the surface. The comet's gravity is astonishingly weak, but is there, and so does attract Philae, however tenuously. It's settled now, and tweeted:
Philae Lander ✔ @Philae2014
Follow
Hello! An update on life on #67P - Yesterday was exhausting! I actually performed 3 landings,15:33, 17:26 & 17:33 UTC. Stay tuned for more


A full panorama from Philae will be revealed at the press conference 1pm today and will be put up on the ESA site

Compared with the moon landings, I'm a bit peeved actually at how many people don't give a fsck about this, and equally how few even have a clue as to what an absolutely astonishing, mind-blowing achievement this is. Shame how the world has dumbed-down.
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
Recent
Andy Badrock - new signing apparently
Vancouver Le
2
Recent
7pm tonight
Shifty Cat
9
Recent
Round 13 Hull FC A
Once were Lo
98
Recent
Smith out ASAP
Once were Lo
661
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Leeds at Home
boardwalkemp
262
1m
Cas a again
WWste
55
2m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
37546
2m
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Claims Dragons Scalp
RLFANS News
1
2m
Andy Badrock - new signing apparently
Vancouver Le
2
5m
7pm tonight
Shifty Cat
9
5m
Jon Wilkin
Trebor1
11
6m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Once were Lo
9153
6m
Shopping list for 2025
mwindass
2694
6m
Smith out ASAP
Once were Lo
661
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
TJ on a diet
Trojan Horse
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Claims Dragons Scalp
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Kevin Sinfield
Philth
4
TODAY
Jon Wilkin
Chesterrhino
1
TODAY
Hull FC Get Second Win By Beating the Rhinos
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Surely its all over now for Watson
Hangerman2
2
TODAY
Super Salford First Half Slays The Wolves
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Tonights game v Salford
matt_wire
75
TODAY
7pm tonight
Shifty Cat
9
TODAY
Andy Badrock - new signing apparently
Vancouver Le
2
TODAY
OCarroll extends contract
smiffythebul
4
TODAY
Sintillins
BigTime
5
TODAY
Max Lehmann signs
Rafa9
4
TODAY
Squads - Dragons v Leopards
Cokey
1
TODAY
Whitehaven A
Bull Mania
4
TODAY
Round 13 Hull FC A
Once were Lo
98
TODAY
England to play Samoa in autumn Test Series
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Clai..
156
Hull FC Get Second Win By Beat..
186
Super Salford First Half Slays..
332
England to play Samoa in autum..
321
Wakefield Trinity Show No Merc..
1342
Wigan Warriors Dominate Challe..
1042
St Helens Beat Leeds To Lift F..
1147
Rugby League to pay homage to ..
1243
2024 State of Origin - Game 1 ..
1275
Rob Burrow - The Passing of a ..
1775
Salford Red Devils Up To Six A..
1405
Leeds Into The Six After Derby..
1406
Weakened Wigan Beat Warrington..
1446
St Helens Extend Lead At The T..
1511
Wigan Warriors Back Level Top ..
2738
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Sun 16th Jun
SL
15:00
LondonB-St.Helens
Thu 20th Jun
SL
20:00
Castleford-Hull KR
Fri 21st Jun
SL
20:00
Leeds-Leigh
SL
20:00
Wigan-LondonB
Sat 22nd Jun
SL
15:00
Hull FC-Warrington
SL
17:30
Catalans-Huddersfield
Sun 23rd Jun
SL
15:00
Salford-St.Helens
Wed 26th Jun
SOO
11:05
New South Wales-Queensland
Sat 29th Jun
MINT2024
17:00
France M-England M
WINT2024
14:30
FRANCE W-ENGLAND W
Wed 17th Jul
SOO
11:05
Queensland-New South Wales
Sat 17th Aug
SL
18:00
Warrington-Leeds
SL
15:30
Wigan-St.Helens
SL
13:00
Hull FC-LondonB
Sun 18th Aug
SL
13:00
Leigh-Salford
SL
15:30
Catalans-Hull KR
SL
18:00
Huddersfield-Castleford
Sun 27th Oct
MINT2024
14:30
England M-Samoa M
Sat 2nd Nov
MINT2024
14:30
England M-Samoa M
Sat 15th Jun
SL 14 Hull FC18-10Leeds
SL 14 Catalans2-10Leigh
WSL2024 6 BarrowW6-46WiganW
WSL2024 6 FeatherstoneW10-16Wire W
CH 11 Barrow28-38Halifax
CH 11 Toulouse52-0Doncaster
NRL 15 Wests18-10Gold Coast
NRL 15 NZ Warriors24-38Melbourne
NRL 15 Parramatta18-28Sydney
Fri 14th Jun
SL 14 Castleford8-10Wigan
SL 14 Hull KR32-6Huddersfield
SL 14 Warrington14-25Salford
NRL 15 Canberra16-34NQL Cowboys
NRL 15 Souths22-12Brisbane
Thu 13th Jun
NRL 15 Cronulla28-30Dolphins
Sun 9th Jun
NRL 14 Melbourne36-28Newcastle
NRL 14 Penrith32-22Manly
Sat 8th Jun
18956 Wakefield50-6Sheffield
NRL 14 Gold Coast12-46Souths
NRL 14 NQL Cowboys12-42NZ Warriors
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 13 367 164 203 22
St.Helens 13 353 136 217 20
Hull KR 14 370 189 181 20
Warrington 14 334 195 139 18
Salford 14 275 270 5 18
Catalans 14 266 202 64 16
 
Leeds 14 256 260 -4 14
Huddersfield 14 280 295 -15 12
Leigh 13 254 208 46 11
Castleford 14 226 416 -190 7
Hull FC 14 180 450 -270 4
LondonB 13 134 510 -376 2
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 10 384 100 284 20
Widnes 10 260 171 89 15
Sheffield 10 288 170 118 14
Toulouse 10 276 174 102 12
Featherstone 10 290 211 79 12
Bradford 10 229 184 45 12
 
Doncaster 11 215 279 -64 9
Swinton 10 226 270 -44 8
Batley 10 161 218 -57 8
Whitehaven 10 192 272 -80 8
Halifax 11 208 313 -105 8
Barrow 10 179 293 -114 8
York 11 201 251 -50 6
Dewsbury 11 144 303 -159 2
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
Recent
Andy Badrock - new signing apparently
Vancouver Le
2
Recent
7pm tonight
Shifty Cat
9
Recent
Round 13 Hull FC A
Once were Lo
98
Recent
Smith out ASAP
Once were Lo
661
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Leeds at Home
boardwalkemp
262
1m
Cas a again
WWste
55
2m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
37546
2m
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Claims Dragons Scalp
RLFANS News
1
2m
Andy Badrock - new signing apparently
Vancouver Le
2
5m
7pm tonight
Shifty Cat
9
5m
Jon Wilkin
Trebor1
11
6m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Once were Lo
9153
6m
Shopping list for 2025
mwindass
2694
6m
Smith out ASAP
Once were Lo
661
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
TJ on a diet
Trojan Horse
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Claims Dragons Scalp
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Kevin Sinfield
Philth
4
TODAY
Jon Wilkin
Chesterrhino
1
TODAY
Hull FC Get Second Win By Beating the Rhinos
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Surely its all over now for Watson
Hangerman2
2
TODAY
Super Salford First Half Slays The Wolves
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Tonights game v Salford
matt_wire
75
TODAY
7pm tonight
Shifty Cat
9
TODAY
Andy Badrock - new signing apparently
Vancouver Le
2
TODAY
OCarroll extends contract
smiffythebul
4
TODAY
Sintillins
BigTime
5
TODAY
Max Lehmann signs
Rafa9
4
TODAY
Squads - Dragons v Leopards
Cokey
1
TODAY
Whitehaven A
Bull Mania
4
TODAY
Round 13 Hull FC A
Once were Lo
98
TODAY
England to play Samoa in autumn Test Series
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Clai..
156
Hull FC Get Second Win By Beat..
186
Super Salford First Half Slays..
332
England to play Samoa in autum..
321
Wakefield Trinity Show No Merc..
1342
Wigan Warriors Dominate Challe..
1042
St Helens Beat Leeds To Lift F..
1147
Rugby League to pay homage to ..
1243
2024 State of Origin - Game 1 ..
1275
Rob Burrow - The Passing of a ..
1775
Salford Red Devils Up To Six A..
1405
Leeds Into The Six After Derby..
1406
Weakened Wigan Beat Warrington..
1446
St Helens Extend Lead At The T..
1511
Wigan Warriors Back Level Top ..
2738


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!