Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:06 pm  

JLM32 wrote:

Well dodged again Mugwump.

I've added plenty substance, but in true Mugwump style you dodge anything that you can't answer or that questions your I'm always right self importance. Just as a starter for ten, lets see if you can answer the two below. Without dodging, or silly little emoticons I hasten to add.

1.) Your research finds you a quote, that in your words proves as FACT the existence of the New World Order. It doesn't take me very long to prove this quote is inaccurate and unreliable. This shows about how reliable your research is, maybe you should look elsewhere?

2.) You present evidence that Sandy Hook was a conspiracy. One of the main pieces of evidence you presented via your "Research" to prove this, is that a Planning for the needs of Children in disasters was run in the state on the same day "And this cant be a coincidence." However, when you properly look into it, not just directly take a quote from the Daily Crackpot, then you see that at least six of these events took place across the state over the Month and Month after the disaster. This would show it was actually a planned scheme and not a one of "Coincidence" . Yet more evidence that maybe you should be looking elsewhere.

STALKER ALERT.

1.David Rockefeller is a known evil, evil psychopath. This man swears his allegiance to the NWO Cabal in his memoirs book

2. Sandy Hoax is one hell of a fake. There's a million and one abnormal findings which needs a thread of its own to explain the lengths they went too with that operation.I dare you to open a thread on it. I'd bombard it with the truth.

You are a bad stalker

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:20 pm  

JLM32s OBSESSION with me is bordering on creepy. When he's not talking to me he's talking about me.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:46 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

STALKER ALERT.

1.David Rockefeller is a known evil, evil psychopath. This man swears his allegiance to the NWO Cabal in his memoirs book

2. Sandy Hoax is one hell of a fake. There's a million and one abnormal findings which needs a thread of its own to explain the lengths they went too with that operation.I dare you to open a thread on it. I'd bombard it with the truth.

You are a bad stalker

1.) Still no response to your fake quote. You desperately tried to pass of as fact. How sad an embarrassing for you.

2.) Yet you can't even explain the one comment ive made? Why would I open up another thread that you can fill with your tin hat wearing conspiracy theorist nonsense?

A stalker? No just replying to your rubbish.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:20 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

JLM32s OBSESSION with me is bordering on creepy. When he's not talking to me he's talking about me.

Oh would you look at that Tweedledee posts and then as if by magic here's tweedleverydumb. Even using the same weird obsession/stalker angle as the homophobe. What a strange coincidence.

Just a couple of things. 1.) No matter how big you make a word or how many times you underline it, it doesn't make it anymore true.

2.) I'd have thought even someone as pompous and self important as you would see that I can't make a comparison to you, without mentioning you. Hardly rocket science is it?

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:35 pm  

Mugwump wrote: It's kinda pointless discussing current US foreign policy because we're currently in the "lame duck" period of Obama's second term. A lot of faith has been attached to the recent nuclear deal with Iran but I suspect it's little more than a smokescreen for actions further down the line. The analogy I use for the Democrats and the Republicans is that of the train and its driver. Ultimately, it really doesn't matter which you choose because the train is on rails. The destination known. The only difference between the two is the Democrats occasionally apply the handbrake whilst the Republicans just tear it off completely and stamp on the accelerator. However, with Jeb Bush & Hilary the two likely presidential contenders even the handbrake could soon become a thing of the past. The weird thing is - they are a lot closer than many people believe. Bush the elder nominated Bill Clinton when it became obvious that he was looking down a gun barrel if he won a second term in the White House over the litany of crimes which spilled out of Iran-Contra. After all, Clinton was up to his eyeballs in the very same cocaine trafficking mess which was being run out of Mena, Arkansas by Barry Seal and the CIA. Within a few weeks of Clinton's inauguration the Iran-Contra special prosecutor, Laurence Walsh, quietly shelved plans to investigate Poppy. And when Kenneth Starr's Senate Whitewater investigations were getting perilously close to the string of dead bodies which littered the Clintons' wake - Poppy returned the favour and Starr suddenly faced a few troubles of his own. But don't let the above reciprocity confuse you. These are not equal partners. Whilst the Clintons invariably occupy top spot with the media - they are totally outmatched in all other departments. The Bushes have the lineage, the money and unrivaled connections to the absolute top tier of the national security state, defence establishment, big finance etc. Even if you choose Clinton - you're still getting Bush's foreign policy. Just look at the cast of characters surrounding Hilary - it's the same crowd of reactionary Zionists which plagued the younger Bush's presidency. If people thought Obama was out of control with his assassination squads and drone strikes - wait till these nutcases grab the reins of power. Just as an addendum to the above - Elect Hilary and get Bush's foreign policy free! (Huffington Post).

Mugwump wrote: It's kinda pointless discussing current US foreign policy because we're currently in the "lame duck" period of Obama's second term. A lot of faith has been attached to the recent nuclear deal with Iran but I suspect it's little more than a smokescreen for actions further down the line. The analogy I use for the Democrats and the Republicans is that of the train and its driver. Ultimately, it really doesn't matter which you choose because the train is on rails. The destination known. The only difference between the two is the Democrats occasionally apply the handbrake whilst the Republicans just tear it off completely and stamp on the accelerator. However, with Jeb Bush & Hilary the two likely presidential contenders even the handbrake could soon become a thing of the past. The weird thing is - they are a lot closer than many people believe. Bush the elder nominated Bill Clinton when it became obvious that he was looking down a gun barrel if he won a second term in the White House over the litany of crimes which spilled out of Iran-Contra. After all, Clinton was up to his eyeballs in the very same cocaine trafficking mess which was being run out of Mena, Arkansas by Barry Seal and the CIA. Within a few weeks of Clinton's inauguration the Iran-Contra special prosecutor, Laurence Walsh, quietly shelved plans to investigate Poppy. And when Kenneth Starr's Senate Whitewater investigations were getting perilously close to the string of dead bodies which littered the Clintons' wake - Poppy returned the favour and Starr suddenly faced a few troubles of his own. But don't let the above reciprocity confuse you. These are not equal partners. Whilst the Clintons invariably occupy top spot with the media - they are totally outmatched in all other departments. The Bushes have the lineage, the money and unrivaled connections to the absolute top tier of the national security state, defence establishment, big finance etc. Even if you choose Clinton - you're still getting Bush's foreign policy. Just look at the cast of characters surrounding Hilary - it's the same crowd of reactionary Zionists which plagued the younger Bush's presidency. If people thought Obama was out of control with his assassination squads and drone strikes - wait till these nutcases grab the reins of power. Just as an addendum to the above - Elect Hilary and get Bush's foreign policy free! (Huffington Post).

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:07 pm  

JLM32 wrote:

Oh would you look at that Tweedledee posts and then as if by magic here's tweedleverydumb. Even using the same weird obsession/stalker angle as the homophobe. What a strange coincidence.

Just a couple of things. 1.) No matter how big you make a word or how many times you underline it, it doesn't make it anymore true.

2.) I'd have thought even someone as pompous and self important as you would see that I can't make a comparison to you, without mentioning you. Hardly rocket science is it?

For heaven's sake! Change the record before you bore everyone rigid. In the two days I've been too busy to post you've not stopped yapping about me. That's OBSESSIVE STALKER behaviour. I mean, I've seen weirder. But it's still pretty weird.

Either way - it's clear that responding to you just makes it worse for everyone else in here so I think it's time to just turn you off.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 9:20 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

For heaven's sake! Change the record before you bore everyone rigid. In the two days I've been too busy to post you've not stopped yapping about me. That's OBSESSIVE STALKER behaviour. I mean, I've seen weirder. But it's still pretty weird.

Either way - it's clear that responding to you just makes it worse for everyone else in here so I think it's time to just turn you off.

No, I think you'll find I've been comparing you, and to do that you would have to be mentioned, not really that hard to understand is it? You have so many similarities it's harder not to compare you. I think you really need to check the definition of Obsessive Stalker, whoever you are posting as.

Turn me off, that just proves my point to everyone here, that you can't handle anyone who has a differing opinion or stands up to your attempted Bullying tactics.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:56 pm  

If anyone is bored, read the David Icke forums. They are hilarious

Regards

King James

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Nov 27, 2015 11:11 am  

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:34 pm  

Lebron James wrote:

If anyone is bored, read the David Icke forums. They are hilarious

To be honest, I don't know a great deal about the guy - other than he attracts a ton of stick and used to host snooker on BBC2.

That said, I do know he was pushing for an investigation into the very same crowd of paedophiles at Dolphin Square at least ten years before anyone in authority made the effort. And he was banging the drum about Jimmy Savile for even longer.

Can't comment on any of his other claims but he was certainly correct on those counts.