Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:09 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

That said, I do know he was pushing for an investigation into the very same crowd of paedophiles at Dolphin Square at least ten years before anyone in authority made the effort. And he was banging the drum about Jimmy Savile for even longer.

Can't comment on any of his other claims but he was certainly correct on those counts.

Yeah David Icke exposed big names in his book Saville, Leon Britain, Lord Mountbatten, and Ted Heath just to name a few.

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
-Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

There is no way David Icke is anything but controlled opposition. He is an agent of propaganda hired to herd dissent and people with questions towards far fetched territories such as Shape-shifting reptilian Aliens. In other words he's drip feeding truth's to reel you in then gate keeps you only then leading you to the NWO agenda ( making you believe in aliens ).

I believe David Icke is a very intelligent man, researcher but most of all a very good communicator. I think he believes too much that is told to him but is more right than people give him credit for. I saw him being interviewed on "The Project Camelot" series of youtube interviews - mostly phony's of those I have seen. I had previously seen an American predecessor , Jordan Maxwell on the same series. Apparently JM had sponsored DI in some way. DI seemed to use similiar ways of speaking about things as JM. I observed that JM spoke about having the feeling of being protected by invisible forces. DI articulated the same thing. I believe he had this, perhaps subconsciously to his "repertoire". David Icke had based his style on American style "communicators " in the same way the Beatles copied US Rock N Roll and took it back

The Main Stream Media IS the censorship machine. Everything you will ever hear through the "official channels" about the government, any politician or public figure of any kind any business or business owner, any crime or criminal or anything of any significance whatsoever gets filtered through the Main Stream Media. If they don't want you to hear about it, you won't. If you ever utter a word that wasn't on TV or state an opinion that isn't officially sanctioned, you're immediately a fruitcake ( Proven in this thread ) When you think about it, it's very simple. You will not be legitimate unless the Main Stream makes you legitimate. And anyone who is legitimate is absolutely someone you probably shouldn't trust.

So why is Icke, Alex Jones etc Gate- Keepers ? Its to drag you into believing in Aliens.And that's the NWO agenda.

Virtually every time I talk to someone about anything of a 'conspiratorial' nature, they assume that I must believe in aliens.The gate-keeper conspiracy Researcher’s push this alien nonsense. Alarm Bells to anyone talking any Alien Bullshit. There’s no doubt David Icke talks a lot of sense with certain topics but his whole agenda is to drag you in with the truth then gate keep you to believing in Shape-shifting Reptilians Aliens really exist.

Over And Out.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:34 pm  

Well, I do believe in aliens. There's nothing particularly special about the processes which led to the arrival of homo sapiens on planet earth and given the limitless possibilities afforded by a universe of unimaginable scale it's just silly to think they couldn't be repeated on myriad worlds. And that's without even getting into the possibility of sentient life forms developing on planets which an alarmingly high number of purportedly eminent scientists seem willing to rule out entirely because they are not "sufficiently earthlike" (how these people ever managed to pass "Research Methods 101" amazes me).

Does this mean they are already here among us? Leaving aside the thorny issue of whether life was delivered to a nascent earth millions of years ago from elsewhere (which kind of renders the question irrelevant anyhow) - all I'll say is that any space-faring race that has mastered the problem of interstellar travel isn't likely to accede to requests from the military to "keep a low profile" and only whizz about everyone's backs are turned (which is all eight or nine series of the X-Files in a nutshell!)

The US Air Force used UFOs as a convenient cover for a variety of top-secret operations during the 50s and 60s including surveillance balloons, nuclear early-warning systems, experimental aircraft etc. From thereon the phenomena took on a life of its own. IIRC, Bill Turner was one of many former military personnel who began to smell something fishy about the whole story. His conclusion (shared by many of his colleagues) was that the armed forces were engaged in a deliberate and systematized disinformation program whereby "Top Secret" documents containing UFO-related data were dispersed among middle-to-high ranking officials ostensibly by "mistake". These "leaks" served the dual purpose of uncovering those officers who couldn't keep their traps shut whilst also disseminating a ton of weird, wonderful and completely bogus UFO myths among the general public.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:46 am  

Who'd have thought that the subject Stand Offish started after the events that cost 130+ people their lives we'd be reading about David Icke and Aliens whilst barely touching on the victims and the response of the French and allies.

Cool stories bro, cool stories.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:40 am  

Mugwump wrote:

You know, whether I agree with Flatstanley or not the behaviour of the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of posters in this thread is nothing short of disgusting. If a dozen posters queued up to question the mental condition of a member in any other thread it would take me a week to go through all the complaints. In case you weren't paying attention there have been a record number of national campaigns this year to raise awareness of the millions of Britons who suffer mental health issues. Almost all do so in silence and isolation because they are afraid they will be stigmatised and socially ostracised.

Why don't you just don a bunch of pillowcases, drag the guy by his ankles a mile or two roped to the back of a pickup and then leave him strung up twitching and convulsing from a tree - because the world needs one less "nut" like it needs one less n*gger/Jew/queer etc. Right?

Jesus H. Christ - we've all done something similar at some point in our lives. After all - it's one of the most common insults used colloquially. But if by the third page some of you weren't feeling a bit uneasy then it won't be long before we see a return of Hitler's T4 euthanasia program because it seems as though it already has a public mandate.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 11:22 am  

I'm touched by Sheldon's humanity.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:01 pm  

It's patently obvious the word "might" doesn't enter into this.. It's as good as a cast-iron guarantee. We're moving into a completely different socio-political paradigm where Terror is the new Reality, folks. Whether you want to believe a bunch of fundamentalist, dope-peddling Arab Bond villains with Mad Hacker Skillz are responsible or our own governments - it really doesn't matter. The end result is the same. More war (on a significantly bigger scale). Greater internal security. Greater surveillance. Dramatically reduced civil liberties (indefinite detention, penetration and neutralization of protest groups), militarized police etc. So I guess the question you have to ask is - are you feeling scared yet?

It's patently obvious the word "might" doesn't enter into this.. It's as good as a cast-iron guarantee. We're moving into a completely different socio-political paradigm where Terror is the new Reality, folks. Whether you want to believe a bunch of fundamentalist, dope-peddling Arab Bond villains with Mad Hacker Skillz are responsible or our own governments - it really doesn't matter. The end result is the same. More war (on a significantly bigger scale). Greater internal security. Greater surveillance. Dramatically reduced civil liberties (indefinite detention, penetration and neutralization of protest groups), militarized police etc. So I guess the question you have to ask is - are you feeling scared yet?

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 4:41 pm  

If i was a law abiding muslim i'd be scared. The rise in Islamaphobia is deafening since the Paris episode. The powers that be know exactly what they're doing by dividiing society.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 5:52 pm  

I feel sympathy for the Arabs (just as I have sympathy for all creeds, colours and religions which are chewed apart by our insatiable war machine). But ultimately they've got to look after themselves.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 6:05 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

I. But ultimately they've got to look after themselves.

First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:46 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

Cool stories bro, cool stories.

1998 just called, it wants its memes back

Regards

King James