Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:09 pm  

Here is a typical mast. With regards to Sky TV being analogue transmitted here is the proof that nails FA's diarrhea. As you can see Analogue signals are not obsolete. Your freeview box or Sky box transforms the analogue signal to Digital. Now i'm not saying Sky and Freeview carry the same analogue band. They both receive different frequency bands. Here is another piece of evidence Satellite signals are Analogue. Satellites don't exist. Now you show me true authentic photo evidence of your satellite.I await more CGI Ad Hominem verbal Diarrhea.

Here is a typical mast. With regards to Sky TV being analogue transmitted here is the proof that nails FA's diarrhea. As you can see Analogue signals are not obsolete. Your freeview box or Sky box transforms the analogue signal to Digital. Now i'm not saying Sky and Freeview carry the same analogue band. They both receive different frequency bands. Here is another piece of evidence Satellite signals are Analogue. Satellites don't exist. Now you show me true authentic photo evidence of your satellite.I await more CGI Ad Hominem verbal Diarrhea.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:12 pm  

So, Stan, what are these then?_

??

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:20 pm  

Is that it. : Thats not photographic. Thats just a friggin list. How pathetically embarrassing Sign of a loser rearranging my posts. Satellites are now in the coffin

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:41 pm  

Your pisspoor response is what is "pathetically embarrassing". You continue to make an utter fool of yourself.

You claim to want to see satellites for yourself, if they exist.

There is NO image ANYONE could EVER provide to you, which you would EVER accept, unless it fitted your bizarre beliefs. But the direct evidence of your own eyes would, if you are sane, and not a troll, be all you needed.

So, you could see loads of satellites, if you only wanted to. I have merely provided you with the tools. But I already knew you dare not use them, for fear of having to swallow your pride and admit your error to yourself.
Everyone knew you would bluster and swerve the issue. You really are a laughing stock.

That's your problem, but there's the list, you need only look up into the sky. Couldn't make it any easier for you.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:51 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Your pisspoor response is what is "pathetically embarrassing". You continue to make an utter fool of yourself. You claim to want to see satellites for yourself, if they exist..

I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:38 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...

No you didn't.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:43 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence. How can i be the fool. If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...

I doubt you have ever actually proved anything of a scientific nature in your life.
You might have proved bread ....

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:59 pm  

I think he's right. I'm looking out of my window now and I can't see a satellite.

Proof.

Suck it b|tches.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:01 pm  

Him wrote:

I think he's right. I'm looking out of my window now and I can't see a satellite.

Proof.

Suck it b|tches.

hahaha bet you can't

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:11 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

I've just proven how Sky TV works with authentic evidence.

In your head. Utter nonsense, which you (or anyone with a working satellite dish) can debunk in an instant by obstructing the line of sight to the satellites, while leaving all the rest of the dish's view including the whole of the visible planet, unobstructed.

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

How can i be the fool.

How can you be the fool? Let me count the ways ...

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

If you disagree please provide me a authentic Satellite in working order.. like i did. Goodluck...

1. I can't provide you with a satellite as they tend to be a tad on the expensive side for my wallet.

2. If in your head you are convinced you provided me "a authentic Satellite in working order", where did you get it from, given you say they don't exist?