Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:56 am  

Rooster Booster wrote:

No riots yet?

Must be winter over there.

Hertfordshire is going hysterical.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:52 am  

Oi, I'll have you know me, the farmers and all the London club based footballers are only slightly miffed, we may even go to Hitchen and wave a fist in the air for a few seconds but we are not hysterical, we aren't Buckinghamshire you know.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:34 am  

I saw someone yesterday in York who puffed their cheeks and if I'm not mistaken slightly shrugged.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:41 am  

Sandra The Terrorist wrote:

I saw someone yesterday in York who puffed their cheeks and if I'm not mistaken slightly shrugged.

Trouble brewing?
I was informed of a roll of the eyes in Harrogate yesterday.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:43 am  

Sandra The Terrorist wrote:

I saw someone yesterday in York who puffed their cheeks and if I'm not mistaken slightly shrugged.

Trouble brewing?
I was informed of a roll of the eyes in Harrogate yesterday.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:49 am  

WIZEB wrote:

Trouble brewing?
I was informed of a roll of the eyes in Harrogate yesterday.

At least you got two accounts that agreed with one another.
lol

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:54 am  

Stand-Offish wrote:

At least you got two accounts that agreed with one another.
lol

The information was that seismic I had to re-check.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:03 am  

WIZEB wrote:

The information was that seismic I had to re-check.

Nevertheless, I see this as progress in the Duggan case.
Lessons have been learned.

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:04 am  

Rooster Booster wrote: No riots yet? Must be winter over there. No, it's not that. http://newsthump.com/2014/01/09/duggan- ... -in-stock/

Rooster Booster wrote: No riots yet? Must be winter over there. No, it's not that. http://newsthump.com/2014/01/09/duggan- ... -in-stock/

Re: The Mark Duggan verdict. : Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:27 am  

Richie wrote:

Thanks for clarifying. Are you glad of that situation?

Why do you again answer a different question to the one asked?
I see no one else is responding to you. I'd happily discuss subjects with you, you're clearly not dumb, but not whilst you think you're playing "forum wars" and avoiding and evading questions (every thread we have conversed on) If you persist with that approach to discussion, then there is no point continuing.

I wasnt indulging in 'forum wars' i simply wasnt indulging in your straw man. I was completely consistant in what i said. It was you who tried to change that.