Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:12 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

I can't bare to watch it. that piece of scum Mr Piggy Cameron is lying to you and wants to deceive you and take you to a 1984 new world order where he will be living with luxuries while you and you family are suffering under their dictatorship. He hates you and pretends he cares..when are people going to wake up to this excrement

Only a few months ago he wanted to bomb Syria and to out Assad, arming their made-up terror group ISIS or ISIL or whatever they call themselves these days, they have more name changes than climate change or global warming or global freezing...The FACT is that now in a complete u-turn he wants Assad's help to bomb the made-up terror group ISIS that he has been arming...I think if anyone is a terrorist sympathiser it is David Piggy Cameron and his mates who only are interested in bombing the hell out of Syria and killing innocent people along the way

Wow! I can't really decide if you are on a wind up, or just the strangest man alive.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:41 pm  

The sooner the better we get the planes in the sky the better. Lets rid the world of the scumbags.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:19 pm  

Fill your boots Stan. http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/id ... 2?irpc=932

Fill your boots Stan. http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/id ... 2?irpc=932

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:03 am  

King Street Cat wrote: Fill your boots Stan. http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/id ... 2?irpc=932 Ha Ha Ha another hoax Delve a bit deeper King Street Sheep.. What's the odds, one of first people interviewed by CBS All Seeing Eye on CNN (located on the 33rd degree) is a father, who's son is in building and he is wearing a hat with the FREEMASONS LOGO.. Bullshit Alert

King Street Cat wrote: Fill your boots Stan. http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/id ... 2?irpc=932 Ha Ha Ha another hoax Delve a bit deeper King Street Sheep.. What's the odds, one of first people interviewed by CBS All Seeing Eye on CNN (located on the 33rd degree) is a father, who's son is in building and he is wearing a hat with the FREEMASONS LOGO.. Bullshit Alert

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:21 am  

Another staged hoax whilsta trial run was in operation. Ha ha wake up https://youtu.be/YhbSy_k0jCA

Another staged hoax whilsta trial run was in operation. Ha ha wake up https://youtu.be/YhbSy_k0jCA

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:40 am  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

So it looks like the UK is going to be dragged into another endless war it's people don't want, whilst David Cameron has the gaul to call people who don't support his agenda "terrorist sympathisers". It all makes me sick to my stomach.

We are not being dragged into another war! We have been in the same war for over a year. All this is is an extension of the area of operation from Iraq, over a border that Daesh doesn't recognise, into the Daesh controlled areas of Syria.

Polls have shown a clear majority of our people approve airstrikes than disapprove, although the majority may have reduced in recent days it remains a clear majority. Of those polled only Labour voters changed from a majority for action to a majority against action in recent days but we should remember that it was theses Labour voters who lost the election in May by a big majority.

Parliament had a long debate with all sides having chance to express opinions and good speeches from both sides too. In the end a clear and decisive majority voted to back the government action. Misinformation and failure to accept democracy when it doesn't go your way makes me a bit sick too.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 12:32 pm  

Juan Cornetto wrote:

We are not being dragged into another war! We have been in the same war for over a year. All this is is an extension of the area of operation from Iraq, over a border that Daesh doesn't recognise, into the Daesh controlled areas of Syria.

Polls have shown a clear majority of our people approve airstrikes than disapprove, although the majority may have reduced in recent days it remains a clear majority. Of those polled only Labour voters changed from a majority for action to a majority against action in recent days but we should remember that it was theses Labour voters who lost the election in May by a big majority.

Parliament had a long debate with all sides having chance to express opinions and good speeches from both sides too. In the end a clear and decisive majority voted to back the government action. Misinformation and failure to accept democracy when it doesn't go your way makes me a bit sick too.

We've been in the same war (with a brief interlude during WWII) for the past hundred years. Only the proxies change.

As for this idea for democracy - I could point to any number of anti-democratic decisions taken by successive governments but the truth is the very idea of a representative democracy is throwback to the days when it took a week for the local MP to ride down to London and back again. The notion that a single guy can represent the interests of me, you, the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker, BAE Systems and any number of other interests within a geographical location is patently absurd.

We live in an interconnected Information Age - people are perfectly capable of representing themselves. If not - don't bother calling it democracy.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:52 pm  

Juan Cornetto wrote: We are not being dragged into another war! We have been in the same war for over a year. All this is is an extension of the area of operation from Iraq, over a border that Daesh doesn't recognise, into the Daesh controlled areas of Syria. Polls have shown a clear majority of our people approve airstrikes than disapprove, although the majority may have reduced in recent days it remains a clear majority. Of those polled only Labour voters changed from a majority for action to a majority against action in recent days but we should remember that it was theses Labour voters who lost the election in May by a big majority. Parliament had a long debate with all sides having chance to express opinions and good speeches from both sides too. In the end a clear and decisive majority voted to back the government action. Misinformation and failure to accept democracy when it doesn't go your way makes me a bit sick too. What polls would these be, Jaun? https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/12/02/an ... kes-syria/ Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and now Syria to add to the never ending success story of Western military intervention in the Middle East. What was Einstein's definition of insanity? Instead of killing 100s of innocent people, why aren't the UK, and the West doing more to cut off IS's revenue streams? Could that be because that would mean taking Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, in particular to task on their support for IS, and refusal to take any Syrian migrants? It would, but obviously we can't go poking the Saudi's with a stick, that would be bad for business. I mean, it's not as if the Saudi's have beheaded 150 people already this year, and impose the same brutal interpretation of Wahhabism as the IS, ISIS, ISIL, Deash, or whatever other name the media is going to come up with to keep the drums of war beating. I wouldn't find this whole think quite so repugnant if it were, indeed intended to rid the world of religious fascism, but it isn't, it's to remove a regime that won't play ball with Western energy companies.

Juan Cornetto wrote: We are not being dragged into another war! We have been in the same war for over a year. All this is is an extension of the area of operation from Iraq, over a border that Daesh doesn't recognise, into the Daesh controlled areas of Syria. Polls have shown a clear majority of our people approve airstrikes than disapprove, although the majority may have reduced in recent days it remains a clear majority. Of those polled only Labour voters changed from a majority for action to a majority against action in recent days but we should remember that it was theses Labour voters who lost the election in May by a big majority. Parliament had a long debate with all sides having chance to express opinions and good speeches from both sides too. In the end a clear and decisive majority voted to back the government action. Misinformation and failure to accept democracy when it doesn't go your way makes me a bit sick too. What polls would these be, Jaun? https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/12/02/an ... kes-syria/ Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and now Syria to add to the never ending success story of Western military intervention in the Middle East. What was Einstein's definition of insanity? Instead of killing 100s of innocent people, why aren't the UK, and the West doing more to cut off IS's revenue streams? Could that be because that would mean taking Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, in particular to task on their support for IS, and refusal to take any Syrian migrants? It would, but obviously we can't go poking the Saudi's with a stick, that would be bad for business. I mean, it's not as if the Saudi's have beheaded 150 people already this year, and impose the same brutal interpretation of Wahhabism as the IS, ISIS, ISIL, Deash, or whatever other name the media is going to come up with to keep the drums of war beating. I wouldn't find this whole think quite so repugnant if it were, indeed intended to rid the world of religious fascism, but it isn't, it's to remove a regime that won't play ball with Western energy companies.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 2:44 pm  

Great post Charlie, here's an interesting statistic for you.

In the year 2000 - 7 countries without a Rothshild owned central bank:Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, N.Korea, Iran. Syria

In 2003 - 6 countries without a Rothshild Central Bank: Sudan, Libya, Syria, Cuba, N. Korea, Iran.

In 2011 - 4. countries left:Cuba, N. Korea, Iran. Syria

In 2015 - Syria is the next to go leaving, Cuba, N. Korea, Iran.

I think it's a no brainer who's next after Syria.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 03, 2015 2:46 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Another staged hoax whilsta trial run was in operation. Ha ha wake up https://youtu.be/YhbSy_k0jCA ] Yeah, I Think I've decided. You are the strangest man on here, not on a wind up. The way you see hoax in everything is comical. You do realise, that these Trial runs take place all over the country on a daily basis right? The way you disrespect those who have died in events like this, by stating it never happened is a disgrace. But then for an already banned once Homophobe like yourself, I guess you have no issues in how low you stoop.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Another staged hoax whilsta trial run was in operation. Ha ha wake up https://youtu.be/YhbSy_k0jCA ] Yeah, I Think I've decided. You are the strangest man on here, not on a wind up. The way you see hoax in everything is comical. You do realise, that these Trial runs take place all over the country on a daily basis right? The way you disrespect those who have died in events like this, by stating it never happened is a disgrace. But then for an already banned once Homophobe like yourself, I guess you have no issues in how low you stoop.