Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:23 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Hypnotist dream Ha ha i don't watch Mainstream hypnosis channels you do

I watch/ listen to alternative media. Much more meat on the bones and a lot closer to the truth

Anyway the threads all yours i've had enough of this flatulence subject.

Goodbye Flatulence Stanley.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:26 pm  

If I started walking East. At what point would I fall off the flat earth? China?

Regards

King James

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:04 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: i've no idea what you've posted but i'd give a very good guess it'll be something like some Freemason with a name similar to TWIN PEAKES faking a launch in a pretty big firework which curved intoA HORIZONTAL POSITION WITHIN 40 SECONDS ha ha i found it most amusing all the sheeple we're all cheering and clapping a Hollywood film. I wonder why it only shown 2 minutes of footage with supposedly with tens of thousands of satellites roaming the earth. It could of filmed the full flight, It's a wonder itself that it managed to swerve all satellite obstructions up there too. I also found it hilarious how the fake module travelling at 17.000mph at 5mps without crashing ha ha manages to DOCKwithout a single hitch whilst sub-mergerd within the pure vacuum of space whilst at the same time the control room guys were all munching on their sandwiches ha ha i found it hilarious. The film was FULL OF AGAIN CGI The only proof in that film that they entered orbit was the pesky pendulum started bouncing ha ha I find it so hilarious how the sheeple are easily fooled. Ha ha What a complete and utter knob you are.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: i've no idea what you've posted but i'd give a very good guess it'll be something like some Freemason with a name similar to TWIN PEAKES faking a launch in a pretty big firework which curved intoA HORIZONTAL POSITION WITHIN 40 SECONDS ha ha i found it most amusing all the sheeple we're all cheering and clapping a Hollywood film. I wonder why it only shown 2 minutes of footage with supposedly with tens of thousands of satellites roaming the earth. It could of filmed the full flight, It's a wonder itself that it managed to swerve all satellite obstructions up there too. I also found it hilarious how the fake module travelling at 17.000mph at 5mps without crashing ha ha manages to DOCKwithout a single hitch whilst sub-mergerd within the pure vacuum of space whilst at the same time the control room guys were all munching on their sandwiches ha ha i found it hilarious. The film was FULL OF AGAIN CGI The only proof in that film that they entered orbit was the pesky pendulum started bouncing ha ha I find it so hilarious how the sheeple are easily fooled. Ha ha What a complete and utter knob you are.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:49 pm  

https://twitter.com/ProfBrianCox/status ... 8893267969

https://twitter.com/ProfBrianCox/status ... 8893267969

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:18 am  

Lebron James wrote:

If I started walking East. At what point would I fall off the flat earth? China?

Regards

King James

Please Sir! I know his answer to that one Sir!

You can't! You would be prevented by the Great Ice Wall which is at The Edge!

if you were thinking, how do they get to and from the permanently crewed station at the South Pole, and the many other places in Antarctica - they don't! If it doesn't fit with Great Ice Wall, then it is fake. Simples!


All fake? None of these countries actually have any such stations.

Sightseeing flights over and now to Antarctica- fake! Flights from S.America to Australia - fake! (They never ever fly, apparently, and even though you can book one like now, apparently you couldn't actually book if you actually tried. All the hundreds of thousands who claim to have flown these routes over the last few decades - liars plants or delusionals, all of them.

That's our Stan. Ask Stan - Stan knows. And, I got his take on the fake Tim Peake's fake flight to the fake ISS right in spades, didn't I?

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Dec 18, 2015 3:12 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Please Sir! I know his answer to that one Sir!

You can't! You would be prevented by the Great Ice Wall which is at The Edge!

if you were thinking, how do they get to and from the permanently crewed station at the South Pole, and the many other places in Antarctica - they don't! If it doesn't fit with Great Ice Wall, then it is fake. Simples!


All fake? None of these countries actually have any such stations.

Sightseeing flights over and now to Antarctica- fake! Flights from S.America to Australia - fake! (They never ever fly, apparently, and even though you can book one like now, apparently you couldn't actually book if you actually tried. All the hundreds of thousands who claim to have flown these routes over the last few decades - liars plants or delusionals, all of them.

That's our Stan. Ask Stan - Stan knows. And, I got his take on the fake Tim Peake's fake flight to the fake ISS right in spades, didn't I?

You're wrong. The Great Ice Wall is permanently manned by blokes dressed in black, probably NASA agents, stopping people from falling off the edge of the world. Tyrion Lannister, the great explorer once went and had a look:

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Dec 18, 2015 5:48 pm  

Back on topic More Propaganda

Back on topic More Propaganda

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Dec 18, 2015 6:08 pm  

Stand-Offish wrote:

Our views are coloured by what our experiences have been ... therein lies possibly non-objectivity.
Both sides exhibit this.
Evidence or opinion, where does one start and the other begin?

Well, again, I don't think they are, in all cases, mutually exclusive. It's a complex relationship which I could spend quite a number of pages talking about - if I had the time (hence the late reply to your question).

Personally without wanting to suffer your wrath , and I did quite like the softer, more reasonable approach of this last post, I am not really sure why it matters so much to you.

I'm not really sure why it DOESN'T matter to you.

I think, even on this side, we are all pretty much prepared to believe that you are right, that it is hard to believe the JFK findings.
But at the end of long delvings you can't tell me definitively who did it. That is no criticism, you have certainly tried.

You are right in saying I can't give you the exact names of the individual shooters in Dealey Plaza (do these even matter?). But you are wrong if you think I haven't told you who was responsible. I've repeatedly named the prime suspects who conspired to assassinate President Kennedy and provided a ton of supporting evidence.

Those names are (in no particular order):

Allen W. Dulles (former head of the CIA).
James Angleton (former head of CIA counter-intelligence division).
Guy Bannister (ex-FBI)
David W. Ferrie (CIA)
Clay Shaw (CIA/OSS)
General Curtis D. LeMay (head of Strategic Air Command)
Richard Bissell (CIA)
David Atlee Phillips (CIA)
H.L. Hunt (Big Oil)
General Edward Lansdale (CIA)
D.H. Bird (Big Oil)
Jack Ruby (CIA/mafia)
Richard Helms (CIA)
William K. Harvey (and his ZR-RIFLE company which almost certainly provided the shooters). (CIA)
McGeorge Bundy (Kennedy staff)
Bill Greer (Secret Service)
and others ...

But I can't for the life of me see how that maps to 9/11.
I am not alone. You are in a small minority that don't see two planes hitting two towers and two towers collapsing in a quite logical manner in keeping with the laws of physics and simple cause and effect.

As I've repeatedly said - I really don't see the tower question as crucial. Once you know there was significant insider trading in the days leading up to 9/11 on the very airlines involved the fate of the towers becomes a secondary issue. Had the US government possessed ANY evidence linking Bin Laden and his group to shorting the stocks of those airlines they would have published it in triple-oversized bold font. The fact that they chose instead to throw a veil of secrecy over the entire issue really doesn't leave one with a great deal of doubt as to the origins of the conspiracy.

So if you can also give us examples of how you have gone in on a conspiracy angle and then after consideration rejected that stance, then that would perhaps demonstrate a balanced view.

I like the fact that you just PRESUME I automatically think everything is a conspiracy first and then (possibly) adjust my opinions in accordance with evidence. This is despite the fact that I have repeatedly told you that the only conspiracy I consistently took seriously in thirty five years was JFK...

I don't need you or anyone else to validate my opinions. I'm confident in what I know and if you want to believe something different that's your business.

You don't need to write a novel every time in response.
You know plebs like me aren't worth it.

Quite.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Dec 18, 2015 6:31 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Well, again, I don't think they are, in all cases, mutually exclusive. It's a complex relationship which I could spend quite a number of pages talking about - if I had the time (hence the late reply to your question).

I'm not really sure why it DOESN'T matter to you.

You are right in saying I can't give you the exact names of the individual shooters in Dealey Plaza (do these even matter?). But you are wrong if you think I haven't told you who was responsible. I've repeatedly named the prime suspects who conspired to assassinate President Kennedy and provided a ton of supporting evidence.

Those names are (in no particular order):

Allen W. Dulles (former head of the CIA).
James Angleton (former head of CIA counter-intelligence division).
Guy Bannister (ex-FBI)
David W. Ferrie (CIA)
Clay Shaw (CIA/OSS)
General Curtis D. LeMay (head of Strategic Air Command)
Richard Bissell (CIA)
David Atlee Phillips (CIA)
H.L. Hunt (Big Oil)
General Edward Lansdale (CIA)
D.H. Bird (Big Oil)
Jack Ruby (CIA/mafia)
Richard Helms (CIA)
William K. Harvey (and his ZR-RIFLE company which almost certainly provided the shooters). (CIA)
McGeorge Bundy (Kennedy staff)
Bill Greer (Secret Service)
and others ...

As I've repeatedly said - I really don't see the tower question as crucial. Once you know there was significant insider trading in the days leading up to 9/11 on the very airlines involved the fate of the towers becomes a secondary issue. Had the US government possessed ANY evidence linking Bin Laden and his group to shorting the stocks of those airlines they would have published it in triple-oversized bold font. The fact that they chose instead to throw a veil of secrecy over the entire issue really doesn't leave one with a great deal of doubt as to the origins of the conspiracy.

I like the fact that you just PRESUME I automatically think everything is a conspiracy first and then (possibly) adjust my opinions in accordance with evidence. This is despite the fact that I have repeatedly told you that the only conspiracy I consistently took seriously in thirty five years was JFK...

I don't need you or anyone else to validate my opinions. I'm confident in what I know and if you want to believe something different that's your business.

Quite.

Another reasonable post ... we are on a convergent path.

Re: Terrorism in Paris again. : Fri Dec 18, 2015 6:35 pm  

Gee Whizz you're well versed with the JFK facts, although theres many key players in his death are you aware of the shooter who delivered the brutal head shot ?. Theres many theories but i was under the impression William Greer delivered it. There was also the theory Jackie Kennedy or the roadside sewage shooter pulled the fatal head shot. All i've researched on this event is the massive ritualistic side to it.