Re: Kier Starmer : Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:26 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

If you could see through the "bull" from both sides, surely, you should have voted for the side that you "believed" and not stayed on your sofa.
It does appear that your constant use of "project fear" would suggest that one of the sides had a fair old influence on you.

Perhaps, one as worldly wise as yourself, could explain the upside to Brexit and if you would be kind enough, please put a timescale on the "good times" ahead.

There wasn't a side I believed

Re: Kier Starmer : Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:33 pm  

JONNYGIANT wrote:

There wasn't a side I believed

Ah, so you just let everyone else decide your fate. That explains rather a lot.
What happened to seeing through the "bull", it actually seems that, apart from picking up a Bojo catch phrase, you couldn't see very much at all.

Re: Kier Starmer : Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:09 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Ah, so you just let everyone else decide your fete. That explains rather a lot.
What happened to seeing through the "bull", it actually seems that, apart from picking up a Bojo catch phrase, you couldn't see very much at all.

Like a church fete

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 7:53 am  

JONNYGIANT wrote:

Like a church fete

Another insightful contribution

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:53 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Another insightful contribution

Nice edit

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:25 am  

Wrencat mate, I've got nothing sensible to add to this debate so would you do me a favour and do a typo. I'd like to pick you up on it please.

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 12:14 pm  

Anyway back to Kier Starmer ,I didn't realise that Labour were in serious trouble in Batley and Spen with the demographics
of the voting population ,read an Owen Jones piece in the Guardian ,had to give my eyeballs a good saline wash afterwards tho,but they are in real danger of losing so surely he will have to go if that happens, but who the hell could they elect to replace him ?

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 12:49 pm  

JONNYGIANT wrote:

Anyway back to Kier Starmer ,I didn't realise that Labour were in serious trouble in Batley and Spen with the demographics
of the voting population ,read an Owen Jones piece in the Guardian ,had to give my eyeballs a good saline wash afterwards tho,but they are in real danger of losing so surely he will have to go if that happens, but who the hell could they elect to replace him ?

Lib Dems have all but confirmed today that they are supporting the Labour candidate in Batley which will be a modest boost (they got 2400 last election) but possibly a key one given the tight race. As I mentioned on the other thread, where its a straight shoot-out between the Cons and either Labour or LD, the 3rd party are bonkers to proactively campaign.

I agree losing Batley would be a huge blow to KS, but I also agree there's no one else emerging as a viable leader. You just got two agrees from a Liberal. It must be snowing in hell right?

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 1:08 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

Wrencat mate, I've got nothing sensible to add to this debate so would you do me a favour and do a typo. I'd like to pick you up on it please.

I'm quite enjoying the "sport".
Giving of ones time to those less fortunate, is always a good thing to do and our "friend" certainly seems to fall into this category.
I'm loving the small insight into their world.
Thanks for the offer though

Re: Kier Starmer : Mon Jun 21, 2021 4:33 pm  

9

wrencat1873 wrote:

I'm quite enjoying the "sport".
Giving of ones time to those less fortunate, is always a good thing to do and our "friend" certainly seems to fall into this category.
I'm loving the small insight into their world.
Thanks for the offer though