Board index Welcome to RLFANS The Sin Bin Brexit Anyone? (part 4)



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 921 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 ... 93  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2019 8:30 am 
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 895
Location: Desperation Island
Sal Paradise wrote:Of course it will a bigger infrastructure - improved health and safety needs, inflation etc. Quite rightly the burden of cost must sit with the consumers who use the system and not build up losses supported by the government. Greater investment in rolling stock etc. if it weren't for the unions most users would suggest punctuality have improved significantly since nationalisation and the trains are significantly better.

If the amount of money being thrown at the railways now had been provided to the managers of British Rail 30 or 40 years ago we would have had a rail system which would have been the best in the world. The root cause of British Rail's problems, such as they were, were underfunding and the solution was not to break it up, remove its interconnectivity and ludicrously insert a private profit-making layer.

Providing a good transport infrastructure is one of the key things the government should do - the railways shouldn't be run as a purely profit making venture any more than the roads are.






"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:09 am 
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 8:28 am
Posts: 16993
Location: On the road
The Ghost of '99 wrote:If the amount of money being thrown at the railways now had been provided to the managers of British Rail 30 or 40 years ago we would have had a rail system which would have been the best in the world. The root cause of British Rail's problems, such as they were, were underfunding and the solution was not to break it up, remove its interconnectivity and ludicrously insert a private profit-making layer.

Providing a good transport infrastructure is one of the key things the government should do - the railways shouldn't be run as a purely profit making venture any more than the roads are.


I agree about a the infrastructure but to me that is the highways and the tracks not the vehicles that run on them - if the government dictate which trains and buses you use why not which cars you drive, which cycles you ride, which side of the road you walk etc.

I doubt there are many who would struggle to get where ever they want on the rail or bus - would prices come down under public ownership - unlikely would there be greater investment in rolling stock again unlikely would the service improve not if past history of public ownership is anything to go by.






Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:08 am 
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:59 am
Posts: 658
The Ghost of '99 wrote:If the amount of money being thrown at the railways now had been provided to the managers of British Rail 30 or 40 years ago we would have had a rail system which would have been the best in the world. The root cause of British Rail's problems, such as they were, were underfunding and the solution was not to break it up, remove its interconnectivity and ludicrously insert a private profit-making layer.

Providing a good transport infrastructure is one of the key th6ings the government should do - the railways shouldn't be run as a purely profit making venture any more than the roads are.


it will be better when Labour abolish OFSTEAD and Labour Properties pay the tax owed on their £20m turnover.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:21 am 
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 895
Location: Desperation Island
IR80 wrote:it will be better when Labour abolish OFSTEAD and Labour Properties pay the tax owed on their £20m turnover.
Are you just hooked up directly to the fever dreams of the hard, hard right media or do you actually have anything relevant or substantive to say?






"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:36 pm 
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:59 am
Posts: 658
The Ghost of '99 wrote:Are you just hooked up directly to the fever dreams of the hard, hard right media or do you actually have anything relevant or substantive to say?

Aww, diddums, have I read about the Conference and investigations into Labour practices?

You are a bit myopic, in a kind of Cyclops way.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 7:17 am 
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2001 12:04 pm
Posts: 16963
Location: Olicana - Home of 'Vark Slayer
Sal Paradise wrote: if it weren't for the unions most users would suggest punctuality have improved significantly since nationalisation

Cobblers. Northern Rail - who I use every day - has a 50-60% on time record this year. Having promised at the start of the year that things would improve dramatically from last year's disastrous performance. Nothing to do with Unions.






The best things in life are not things.
A member of the victorious liberal metropolitan elite.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:35 am 
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:59 am
Posts: 658
tigertot wrote:Cobblers. Northern Rail - who I use every day - has a 50-60% on time record this year. Having promised at the start of the year that things would improve dramatically from last year's disastrous performance. Nothing to do with Unions.

as ever, not telling the full story, 80% within 3 minutes of expected, 96% within 10, usually down to staff being late.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:46 am 
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 8:28 am
Posts: 16993
Location: On the road
tigertot wrote:Cobblers. Northern Rail - who I use every day - has a 50-60% on time record this year. Having promised at the start of the year that things would improve dramatically from last year's disastrous performance. Nothing to do with Unions.


All the Saturday strikes had nothing at all to do with punctuality?






Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:47 am 
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 8:28 am
Posts: 16993
Location: On the road
tigertot wrote:Cobblers. Northern Rail - who I use every day - has a 50-60% on time record this year. Having promised at the start of the year that things would improve dramatically from last year's disastrous performance. Nothing to do with Unions.


You have just made that up haven't you?






Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:13 pm 
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 895
Location: Desperation Island
IR80 wrote:Aww, diddums, have I read about the Conference and investigations into Labour practices?

You are a bit myopic, in a kind of Cyclops way.

I've no love for, and have never voted for, Labour so I'm not sure of the relevance.

I'm just keen for you to express something vaguely coherent.






"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 921 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 ... 93  Next





It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:26 am

Retro.rlfans.com is no longer supported, we suggest that you try www.rlfans.com or i.rlfans.com or m.rlfans.com

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:26 am
POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,978,6301,61177,8924,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
Thu 30th Jan 19:45
SL
WIGAN WARRIORS
v
WARRINGTON
Fri 31st Jan 19:30
 CH
DEWSBURY RAMS
v
LEIGH
Fri 31st Jan 19:45
SL
HULL KR
v
WAKEFIELD
Fri 31st Jan 19:45
SL
ST.HELENS
v
SALFORD
Sat 1st Feb 17:00
SL
CATALAN DRAGONS
v
HUDDERSFIELD
Sat 1st Feb 19:30
 CH
TOULOUSE
v
YORK
Sun 2nd Feb 14:30
SL
TORONTO
v
CASTLEFORD
Sun 2nd Feb 15:00
 CH
BATLEY BULLDOGS
v
FEATHERSTONE
Sun 2nd Feb 15:00
 CH
BRADFORD BULLS
v
LONDON BRONCOS
Sun 2nd Feb 15:00
 CH
HALIFAX
v
SHEFFIELD
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)





11

.