Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 1:38 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I'm good thanks squire, must say also it's another shabby attempt by your good self at winding me up, stick to clocks it's much simpler for you, oh and by the way, you've missed an apostrophe from the word he's if that helps, you couldn't make it up having to educate somebody from the grammar police

I thought to be constructive I should correct your spelling but if you hear something even if you made it up you do not spell it here, also when you say “each to their own” it is not there by the way.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 2:02 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I thought to be constructive I should correct your spelling but if you hear something even if you made it up you do not spell it here, also when you say “each to their own” it is not there by the way.

If you say so squire but can I just point out I'm not a member of the grammar police and don't know what you are on about but thanks for the heads up anyway.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 2:11 pm  

Finally the Tories have killed the Goose that laid the Golden Eggs, the last couple of days have been delightful.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 2:26 pm  

chissitt wrote:

If you say so squire but can I just point out I'm not a member of the grammar police and don't know what you are on about but thanks for the heads up anyway.

I know because if you were a member you would know what I was referencing was the use of the correct spelling not grammar.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 2:27 pm  

The Devil's Advocate wrote:

Finally the Tories have killed the Goose that laid the Golden Eggs, the last couple of days have been delightful.

So much for personality over substance, the problem is the mess he has left behind.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 3:22 pm  

The Devil's Advocate wrote:

Finally the Tories have killed the Goose that laid the Golden Eggs, the last couple of days have been delightful.

Indeed, he tried playing fast and loose but, couldn't keep the plates spinning and then crash, crash, crash, everything is now broken.

Mind you, I'm delighted that he's gone (well, going).

No way should he stat as interim PM though.

This wasn't personality or policy, it was because of trust and integrity and that isn't going to change in the next few weeks.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 4:32 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I know because if you were a member you would know what I was referencing was the use of the correct spelling not grammar.

I humbly beg your pardon on the matter, you ought to be a twin really as you have too many brains for one person.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 4:41 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I humbly beg your pardon on the matter, you ought to be a twin really as you have too many brains for one person.

No one is enough to make you look stupid just like you try to do of others.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 4:54 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

No one is enough to make you look stupid just like you try to do of others.

Thanks for the reply but there was no need, to be fair I cannot take any credit for making you and Steff look stupid, why don't you concentrate on the state of the Government and the problems surrounding the country instead of trying to score cheap points off me, you've had plenty to say in the past, just give Boris your undivided attention and let me go back to my fish.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 5:43 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Thanks for the reply but there was no need, to be fair I cannot take any credit for making you and Steff look stupid, why don't you concentrate on the state of the Government and the problems surrounding the country instead of trying to score cheap points off me, you've had plenty to say in the past, just give Boris your undivided attention and let me go back to my fish.

You like to dish it out but when you are quite often the subject of ridicule the usual defence is to say you make them look stupid. I would suggest if you read my replies for example it is clearly you who is found to be basically a fool, you criticise someone’s grammar but recoil when your own spelling failures are highlighted. I also pointed out that my post had nothing to do with grammar despite your reply make you look a fool again.
I would suggest if you thought what you were posting before you do it might not be so easy to score cheap points off you.
I am more than happy to let you return to your fish.
With regards de Pfeffel you may not know but he has resigned and will be gone by October but yes I am sure he will be able to milk every penny of taxpayers money to feed his lifestyle until then.