Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:04 pm  

Good swerve there Stan. Not worth the effort to ramble on though.

You could try answering the question though. Straight answers are not your forte, but you could start by admitting that you don't know if God exists. Or you could prove he exists to us all and I'll be a convert.

Go on, Stan. Let's see a straight answer.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:06 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: ... The ISS Tracker is just a simple javascript! Illustration.DEBUNKED! Have a go yourself changing your PC clock controls the ISS I note as usual youentirely change a subject you have no answer to. There is more than one ISS tracker. The code of any is simply based on the known orbit of the ISS, as being in orbit, its path is easily predictable by software, Did yu think your "tracker" was actually tracking by direct comms or radar or something? Really?? If you "change the clock" on your PC it won't make any difference to the ISS as you may be astonished to learn your phone or computer doesn't actually control, or even communicate with, any satellite. It predicts for your convenience where the ISS will be, based on where you tell the software you are, and what time and date you tell the software it is. Most sane people will understand that, if you deliberately feed false time/date/location information into a calculator, then on a GIGO principle, you will fsck up your result. Try a simple experiment of your own. At 6pm, change your watch to read 7pm. Then ring and book a taxi for 7.15pm. I bet you that the taxi will arrive at the real 7.15pm, and not the one on your changed watch display. This is because changing the time on your watch does not control the taxi. HTH

FLAT STANLEY wrote: ... The ISS Tracker is just a simple javascript! Illustration.DEBUNKED! Have a go yourself changing your PC clock controls the ISS I note as usual youentirely change a subject you have no answer to. There is more than one ISS tracker. The code of any is simply based on the known orbit of the ISS, as being in orbit, its path is easily predictable by software, Did yu think your "tracker" was actually tracking by direct comms or radar or something? Really?? If you "change the clock" on your PC it won't make any difference to the ISS as you may be astonished to learn your phone or computer doesn't actually control, or even communicate with, any satellite. It predicts for your convenience where the ISS will be, based on where you tell the software you are, and what time and date you tell the software it is. Most sane people will understand that, if you deliberately feed false time/date/location information into a calculator, then on a GIGO principle, you will fsck up your result. Try a simple experiment of your own. At 6pm, change your watch to read 7pm. Then ring and book a taxi for 7.15pm. I bet you that the taxi will arrive at the real 7.15pm, and not the one on your changed watch display. This is because changing the time on your watch does not control the taxi. HTH

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:18 pm  

TheButcher wrote:

Good swerve there Stan. Not worth the effort to ramble on though.

You could try answering the question though. Straight answers are not your forte, but you could start by admitting that you don't know if God exists. Or you could prove he exists to us all and I'll be a convert.

Go on, Stan. Let's see a straight answer.

The Geocentric Plain, Spiritual consciousness. The Word. Miracles and Biblical prophecies are proof of God's fingerprint on this plane. What proof have you got for your god. Oh i forgot Satan is yours disguised as Science.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:22 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: I note as usual youentirely change a subject you have no answer to. There is more than one ISS tracker. The code of any is simply based on the known orbit of the ISS, as being in orbit, its path is easily predictable by software, Did yu think your "tracker" was actually tracking by direct comms or radar or something? Really?? If you "change the clock" on your PC it won't make any difference to the ISS as you may be astonished to learn your phone or computer doesn't actually control, or even communicate with, any satellite. It predicts for your convenience where the ISS will be, based on where you tell the software you are, and what time and date you tell the software it is. Most sane people will understand that, if you deliberately feed false time/date/location information into a calculator, then on a GIGO principle, you will fsck up your result. Try a simple experiment of your own. At 6pm, change your watch to read 7pm. Then ring and book a taxi for 7.15pm. I bet you that the taxi will arrive at the real 7.15pm, and not the one on your changed watch display. This is because changing the time on your watch does not control the taxi. HTH Hahaha the ISS its an Illustration.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: I note as usual youentirely change a subject you have no answer to. There is more than one ISS tracker. The code of any is simply based on the known orbit of the ISS, as being in orbit, its path is easily predictable by software, Did yu think your "tracker" was actually tracking by direct comms or radar or something? Really?? If you "change the clock" on your PC it won't make any difference to the ISS as you may be astonished to learn your phone or computer doesn't actually control, or even communicate with, any satellite. It predicts for your convenience where the ISS will be, based on where you tell the software you are, and what time and date you tell the software it is. Most sane people will understand that, if you deliberately feed false time/date/location information into a calculator, then on a GIGO principle, you will fsck up your result. Try a simple experiment of your own. At 6pm, change your watch to read 7pm. Then ring and book a taxi for 7.15pm. I bet you that the taxi will arrive at the real 7.15pm, and not the one on your changed watch display. This is because changing the time on your watch does not control the taxi. HTH Hahaha the ISS its an Illustration.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:48 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Hahaha the ISS its an Illustration. TROLL alert You forgot that you previously claimed the ISS was a "holograph". Oh dear. Caught out trolling Stan!

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Hahaha the ISS its an Illustration. TROLL alert You forgot that you previously claimed the ISS was a "holograph". Oh dear. Caught out trolling Stan!

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:52 pm  

How can Atheists talk about blind faith. If you want to think something came from nothing and their is no source because there is no proof and certainly not of an intelligence or whatever it is you think, that's fine. Because it requires faith of the unknown. If you are undecided and skeptical then you would be an agnostic Atheist as opposed to an atheist.

Outright rejection in favour of science alone, including the ridiculous theories like big bang, is no different than the main-stream religion as far as brainwashing, conditioning, irrational close-minded thought process, etc. The problem being belief in the unknown, faith in the unproven.

You've placed your faith in materialistic theories as facts. There is your religion. See Mr Butcher there's your blind faith. Splinters in eyes AGAIN

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:54 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

TROLL alert

You forgot that you previously claimed the ISS was a "holograph". Oh dear. Caught out trolling Stan!

The App's are illustrations.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:48 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

The Geocentric Plain, Spiritual consciousness. The Word. Miracles and Biblical prophecies are proof of God's fingerprint on this plane. What proof have you got for your god. Oh i forgot Satan is yours disguised as Science.

Yeah. All of which are claims with no proof. Try harder.

Haha. Satan. Throwing out fairytale characters as some kind of argument strengthener. Just lol.

Come on proof, Stan Stan the conspiracy man. You can do it. You're being dishonest now. All you have to do is say I don't know, or give actual proof.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:51 pm  

whothefeckisalice wrote:

How can Atheists talk about blind faith. If you want to think something came from nothing and their is no source because there is no proof and certainly not of an intelligence or whatever it is you think, that's fine. Because it requires faith of the unknown. If you are undecided and skeptical then you would be an agnostic Atheist as opposed to an atheist.

Outright rejection in favour of science alone, including the ridiculous theories like big bang, is no different than the main-stream religion as far as brainwashing, conditioning, irrational close-minded thought process, etc. The problem being belief in the unknown, faith in the unproven.

You've placed your faith in materialistic theories as facts. There is your religion. See Mr Butcher there's your blind faith. Splinters in eyes AGAIN

Come on Stan. Backing yourself up with your imaginary friend is just sad.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:03 pm  

bren2k wrote:

I don't have a god - and yes, no afterlife is exactly what I'm banking on; for that reason, I try to make best use of the time I have available, safe in the knowledge that dead is dead. You might believe otherwise, but that belief is based on blind faith in a text that can't in any way shape or form be verified. If anyone here is a sheep who can't see the real truth behind the lies, it's you - religion is an invention used to exercise power and control over populations, and it appears you've fallen for it hook, line and sinker.

In answer to your evil heinous post. I won't go into a tirade about how atheism is worse than religion, but I will just say that you atheists are just buying into a different reality tunnel. Its just as dogmatic and narrow as the Abrahamic tunnel. Not Believing in God is one thing, but All the Atheists I have read ( Harris, Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennet, Marx, Nietzsche, De Sade) not only deny a belief in God, but everything else has got to be false too, Souls, Atlantis, UFOs, Cryptids, the Occult, Fairies, Any afterlife scenario, morality, according the the mouthpieces of Atheism, they are all false.

I was an atheist once upon a time, and it made me so miserable If there is no afterlife, we might as well blow our freaking brains out, because we're gonna die anyway and we are just waiting for oblivion. Honestly the false dichotomous Heaven and Hell is better than Oblivion. If I was an atheist, I would be spiritually dead. That is why I believe in God. God is emotional rather than intellectual, You must open up your heart, not your mind.outright rejection in favour of science alone, including the ridiculous theories like big bang, is no different than the main-stream religion as far as brainwashing, conditioning, irrational close-minded thought process, etc. The problem being belief in the unknown, faith in the unproven. You've placed your faith in materialistic theories as facts. There is your religion. Atheism is the path of misery.