Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:32 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

The Galapagos Landings were a hoax! Darwin never went!

Now come on folks, you simply couldn't get this level of comedy anywhere else!

I now realise there ARE no Galapagos islands! The many documentaries I've watched were all in fact filmed in a fake island built in the middle of a fake ocean hidden somewhere in Hollywood! The giant tortoises - some of which you can "see" in zoos around the world - are just animatronics!

How could we all have missed this?

And you surely can't believe humans existed from 200,000 years ago? You are just believing fairytale stories. You have no evidence. Look at all that incessant rant you went on, and it's all 'logic' stories without one piece of evidence.

How could you document the moment you ask? Why not document even one piece of transformation? Nothing. You believe they found 'dinosaur' bones (that look like whale bones and other bones mixed together) from 64 million years ago yet not one skeleton to prove any such in-between to prove the wild claims made about evolution?

Exactly what I said would happen with you, and I am right that evolution is the easiest of the hoaxes to expose. You have nothing. Darwin was a devout Freemason so even he didn't believe his own bullshit.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:56 pm  

I'm glad I found this collection of posts. I've spent most of my working day reading through it. Comedy gold.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:35 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: [b][i] And you surely can't believe humans existed from 200,000 years ago? Believe? There you go again. you're the one who believes stuff, both in absence of evidence, and also despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. That "belief" in the face of anything and everything is your problem. There's acres of evidence freely available from hundreds of sources if not thousands, it is consistent, and the essential timelines are supported by all this scientific research. Therefore it is reasonable to proceed on the basis that the hypothesis is correct. That being that the first common male ancestor of all modern humans lived around 200,000 - 250,000 years ago. The first common female ancestor lived around 100,000 - 200,000 years ago. So yes, I see no reason to doubt the general approximation of 200,000 years. To do so, I'd have to think that all the eminent scientists who have been responsible for this extensive work are all wrong, or all deliberately lying. And that's what YOU "believe". You've not a scrap of evidence that this is the case, absent maybe some link to some screwball delusional YouTube nutcase, but your "beliefs" tell you it wasn't so, and that is why you ignore the hard evidence and won't even consider it. And so instead you pretend it doesn't exist. FLAT STANLEY wrote: You are just believing fairytale stories. See, there you go again! I'm the one who has tonnes of hard factual scientific evidence behind me. You have nothing, unless you count an old book of fairytales. So it is YOU who prefers to believe fairytal stories. just admit it to yourself. FLAT STANLEY wrote: Look at all that incessant rant you went on, and it's all 'logic' stories without one piece of evidence. I didn't and don't rant. I confront you with many points, and you always find a way to avoid them. Because you have no answers, you are in denial. FLAT STANLEY wrote: How could you document the moment you ask? Why not document even one piece of transformation? Nothing. You believe they found 'dinosaur' bones (that look like whale bones and other bones mixed together) from 64 million years ago yet not one skeleton to prove any such in-between to prove the wild claims made about evolution? I would be utterly pointless as even if they found a billion skeletons you would never accept one single piece of evidence, so why are you wasting our time with this ludicrous objection? Second, you are the one who claims that "they" consistently "fake" everything, all the time, from aeropkane flights, to moon landings, to a round Earth, satellites. whatever, it is all CGI and fakery. But if "they" were doing that, then WHY WOULDN'T THEY INDEED HAVE PRODUCED EVERY MISSING LINK SKELETON THAT YOU CLAIM IS MISSING? Come on, Stan, THINK ABOUT THAT. FLAT STANLEY wrote: Exactly what I said would happen with you, What was that, then? FLAT STANLEY wrote: and I am right that evolution is the easiest of the hoaxes to expose. Actually evolution is the easiest to prove Stan. It happens all the time, everywhere around you. But you are dead to reason. I am not a scientist, but I cite as one example of a true genius in his field, the dedicated and tireless geneticist Prof. Lenski. The exchanges between him and one Andy Schlafly are so typical of the exchanges between you and you ilk, rude, bombastic, sneering and oblivious to reason, and patient and helpful responders who despite your bluster and rudeness still afford relatively polite and thoroughly reasoned responses to sometimes ludicrous questions and points. The exchange of letters is so typical of exchanges between you and non-delusional people that you could learn a lot from it. But I mainly cite it as one simple (and incontrovertible) example of evolution concretely and irrefutably seen in abundant action. Yes! EVOLUTION, Stan! If you read the letters it explains it all. E-coli bacteria were used in the study, and because they multiply so quickly, their evolution can easily be studied within a human timeframe. And Prof. Lenski has the evolved strains, as well as the original strains, available for any genuine researcher. Only an utter moron would "not believe in" evolution when it has been so comprehensively shown in living action. Enjoy! http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog PS yes, I know you'll say Lenski is a Freemasonic Satanist and all his alleged research never happened, it's all fake etc. but HE HAS THE LIVING PROOF so please don't even bother

FLAT STANLEY wrote: [b][i] And you surely can't believe humans existed from 200,000 years ago? Believe? There you go again. you're the one who believes stuff, both in absence of evidence, and also despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. That "belief" in the face of anything and everything is your problem. There's acres of evidence freely available from hundreds of sources if not thousands, it is consistent, and the essential timelines are supported by all this scientific research. Therefore it is reasonable to proceed on the basis that the hypothesis is correct. That being that the first common male ancestor of all modern humans lived around 200,000 - 250,000 years ago. The first common female ancestor lived around 100,000 - 200,000 years ago. So yes, I see no reason to doubt the general approximation of 200,000 years. To do so, I'd have to think that all the eminent scientists who have been responsible for this extensive work are all wrong, or all deliberately lying. And that's what YOU "believe". You've not a scrap of evidence that this is the case, absent maybe some link to some screwball delusional YouTube nutcase, but your "beliefs" tell you it wasn't so, and that is why you ignore the hard evidence and won't even consider it. And so instead you pretend it doesn't exist. FLAT STANLEY wrote: You are just believing fairytale stories. See, there you go again! I'm the one who has tonnes of hard factual scientific evidence behind me. You have nothing, unless you count an old book of fairytales. So it is YOU who prefers to believe fairytal stories. just admit it to yourself. FLAT STANLEY wrote: Look at all that incessant rant you went on, and it's all 'logic' stories without one piece of evidence. I didn't and don't rant. I confront you with many points, and you always find a way to avoid them. Because you have no answers, you are in denial. FLAT STANLEY wrote: How could you document the moment you ask? Why not document even one piece of transformation? Nothing. You believe they found 'dinosaur' bones (that look like whale bones and other bones mixed together) from 64 million years ago yet not one skeleton to prove any such in-between to prove the wild claims made about evolution? I would be utterly pointless as even if they found a billion skeletons you would never accept one single piece of evidence, so why are you wasting our time with this ludicrous objection? Second, you are the one who claims that "they" consistently "fake" everything, all the time, from aeropkane flights, to moon landings, to a round Earth, satellites. whatever, it is all CGI and fakery. But if "they" were doing that, then WHY WOULDN'T THEY INDEED HAVE PRODUCED EVERY MISSING LINK SKELETON THAT YOU CLAIM IS MISSING? Come on, Stan, THINK ABOUT THAT. FLAT STANLEY wrote: Exactly what I said would happen with you, What was that, then? FLAT STANLEY wrote: and I am right that evolution is the easiest of the hoaxes to expose. Actually evolution is the easiest to prove Stan. It happens all the time, everywhere around you. But you are dead to reason. I am not a scientist, but I cite as one example of a true genius in his field, the dedicated and tireless geneticist Prof. Lenski. The exchanges between him and one Andy Schlafly are so typical of the exchanges between you and you ilk, rude, bombastic, sneering and oblivious to reason, and patient and helpful responders who despite your bluster and rudeness still afford relatively polite and thoroughly reasoned responses to sometimes ludicrous questions and points. The exchange of letters is so typical of exchanges between you and non-delusional people that you could learn a lot from it. But I mainly cite it as one simple (and incontrovertible) example of evolution concretely and irrefutably seen in abundant action. Yes! EVOLUTION, Stan! If you read the letters it explains it all. E-coli bacteria were used in the study, and because they multiply so quickly, their evolution can easily be studied within a human timeframe. And Prof. Lenski has the evolved strains, as well as the original strains, available for any genuine researcher. Only an utter moron would "not believe in" evolution when it has been so comprehensively shown in living action. Enjoy! http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog PS yes, I know you'll say Lenski is a Freemasonic Satanist and all his alleged research never happened, it's all fake etc. but HE HAS THE LIVING PROOF so please don't even bother

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:31 am  

Come on Stan, your audience awaits!

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

... You believe they found 'dinosaur' bones (that look like whale bones and other bones mixed together) from 64 million years ago ...

Does this look like a "whale bone" to you?

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:24 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Come on Stan, your audience awaits! Does this look like a "whale bone" to you?

Awe you're becoming more of an embarrassment with every post. It looks like a tree trunk simulated to look like a bone. Now hrere's that very supposed bone which is a replica as mentioned in tht Telegraph article. Hahaha they even tell you in plain sight it's a replica. Poor Aardvark falls for it every-time its hilarious.

Sir David Attenborough with a replica of the titanosaur's femur Photo: BBC

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:30 pm  

So you have (as usual) no answers to my last set of points. Quelle surprise!

Sticking with fossils, do try to catch the documentary Stan - you can watch the actual fossil being actually dug up, then encased in protective coating, transported, and in the lab. You'll also see how and why they make replicas.

Though why you would think there is something odd or sinister in a person photographing a replica and saying: "Here's a replica" is a mystery!

Here ya go - originals partly excavated, still on site, where the dinosaur died. Not replicas.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:40 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

No rush. No need to rush. You have nothing but faith in fantasy stories you've been told.

Ironically, you've just summarized the basic requirement for the devout, regardless of which brand of imaginary friend they believe in; blind faith, with no facts, evidence or proof to back up any of the crazy claims they depend on.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:46 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Ironically, you've just summarized the basic requirement for the devout, regardless of which brand of imaginary friend they believe in; blind faith, with no facts, evidence or proof to back up any of the crazy claims they depend on.

Hahaha still unemployed butch...Awe poor lad

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:05 am  

Why do you keep saying I'm unemployed? You don't know anything about me except what I've chosen to tell you. Seems a poor way of brushing off anything Bren writes, and a weird dig at me seeing as I actually told you what I was employed as. You see, it's quite easy to keep tabs on a forum throughout the day because science has made it possible to carry around a personal pc in your pocket, so that whatever you need is only a button press away. Somewhat ironic that the sum total of human knowledge is even at your fingertips, yet you choose to use it to further a life of fantasy and mental illness.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:58 pm  

"David "Eugenics pioneer of bullshit Sir Freemasoic Attenborough" has recently been in a BBC documentary called 'Attenborough and the Giant Dinosaur' which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims.

It starts with the romantic story of a lone Patagonian farmer looking for a lost sheep and chances upon the largest bone ever found just sticking out of the ground. Apparently this bone has been buried for around 100 million years under a few inches of dirt! A team is assembled and cameras are all over it. But you only see them digging and chipping at rock. Not once do you see a bone being uncovered for the first time. You only see them after they have been completely excavated/put in place. By digging a few feet down they manage to find 200 bones belonging to a Totalbullshitasaur (Sorry, Titanosaur).

Then the show ends with them assembling and welding together the 120ft long dinosaur in a warehouse. How they plan to get it out of there and on display is a total mystery to me. But too many people just eat this crap up. To me it looks like carved rock. As if a 1000.000 year old carcous is going to be stuck out the ground like a sore thumb just oozes bullshit.