Re: one man rugby : Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:51 pm
faxcar wrote:
MM. I agree with a lot of what you have mentioned and much of the same can be seen in and amongst my own posts.
The only thing I do not agree with and please don't think I am being critical or having a go,it's just my own view is the reference to having a good old punch up.
Not that I am averse to it as my own playing career shows that if it came down to that I was in with the first of them and had more sendings off for that than any of my team mates.
However in the context of last nights game there was no reason to start a fight, no real nasty fowl play, yes a couple of high shots by the odd player from both sides that happen in every game.
That being the case it would mean that a punch was deliberately being started for no justifiable reason simply because that was the only way we may have got a better result.
To be honest mate if that's what it takes then we don't deserve to win games or even be on the field.
There is a valid argument that we should have matched Fev's fair aggression,comittment and desire to win, meet fire with fire no problem.
There is not and can never be a valid argument to say teams should have a punch up routine in their game plan.
If every side did this, which to meet fire with fire they would have to do what would happen to the game both on and off the field in a very short time???
On a more positive note there is a saying that you can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear and another that says you can only play the cards your dealt with.
At Halifax there are some good quality indvidual players, on paper at least as good as anything the opposition has.
Of course "on paper" means nothing but the point I am trying to make is KH has not got a sows ear or a bad hand of cards to work with.
In time with a few comings and goings to see who fits in and who doesn't for the TEAM and not as individuals things will really start to happen on the field.
That is his job and he will be judged as a coach on his abilty to do this and get the results, I think he's up for it big time.
Finally,taking the emotion of 1 game out of it with all the changes that have happened before the season started I think we are at least as advanced as we thought we would be and probably a bit further, the rest of the season will reveal all.
The only thing I do not agree with and please don't think I am being critical or having a go,it's just my own view is the reference to having a good old punch up.
Not that I am averse to it as my own playing career shows that if it came down to that I was in with the first of them and had more sendings off for that than any of my team mates.
However in the context of last nights game there was no reason to start a fight, no real nasty fowl play, yes a couple of high shots by the odd player from both sides that happen in every game.
That being the case it would mean that a punch was deliberately being started for no justifiable reason simply because that was the only way we may have got a better result.
To be honest mate if that's what it takes then we don't deserve to win games or even be on the field.
There is a valid argument that we should have matched Fev's fair aggression,comittment and desire to win, meet fire with fire no problem.
There is not and can never be a valid argument to say teams should have a punch up routine in their game plan.
If every side did this, which to meet fire with fire they would have to do what would happen to the game both on and off the field in a very short time???
On a more positive note there is a saying that you can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear and another that says you can only play the cards your dealt with.
At Halifax there are some good quality indvidual players, on paper at least as good as anything the opposition has.
Of course "on paper" means nothing but the point I am trying to make is KH has not got a sows ear or a bad hand of cards to work with.
In time with a few comings and goings to see who fits in and who doesn't for the TEAM and not as individuals things will really start to happen on the field.
That is his job and he will be judged as a coach on his abilty to do this and get the results, I think he's up for it big time.
Finally,taking the emotion of 1 game out of it with all the changes that have happened before the season started I think we are at least as advanced as we thought we would be and probably a bit further, the rest of the season will reveal all.
Good post, when Karl came he said building a team was a three year job , it`s all right posters saying why did we get rid of Brannigan or the other Aussies ? Its simple our club can`t afford them , with Karl came a new era for our club , we pay what we can afford and they are on record as saying they slashed the playing budget by picking mainly local lads .We are in transition ,whereas Daryl Powell has had several years at Fev to get his team sorted .
