Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:16 am  

Hoddie literally runs a town forum where a large percentage is slagging the rugby club off , in john mcenroes words ' you cannot be serious '

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:30 am  

I don't know either Bubba or Hoddie. What i will say is i believe Bubba is genuine in what he says. Hoddie however is absolutely full of hatred for Fax and should be nowhere near a group trying to find the best outcome for both sporting clubs using The Shay.

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:58 am  

Bubba wrote:

On the flip side, is he worse for the future of the stadium or either club than any director who has led, for example fax into the current financial predicament they find themselves in?

He has the potential to be as bad for our club. I wonder what the Town fans would be saying if there was someone that was part of the group and for the last decade or so had talked about how they want Town out of the stadium or to go bust again? I think we know the answer to this.

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:53 pm  

I see good will to all men didn’t last long.

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:02 pm  

But they'll put all of their energy in to whining on an internet forum, potentially getting an outcome they're not happy with, and then throwing their hands in the air at the injustice of it all when really they've done nothing actionable to try and alleviate their concerns.

Hats off though to any supporter that supports their local team and puts the effort in to actually go and watch them, rather a team where the most effort they have to put in is turn the telly on. I would hope the love for their club is the over-riding factor in this, as is ours.

I would argue there is more wrong with football that needs addressing rather directing their ire at us.

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 5:28 pm  

Listenup94 wrote:

Hoddie literally runs a town forum where a large percentage is slagging the rugby club off , in john mcenroes words ' you cannot be serious '

So you want free speech to be limited on the forum to something you agree with?

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 5:30 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

He has the potential to be as bad for our club. I wonder what the Town fans would be saying if there was someone that was part of the group and for the last decade or so had talked about how they want Town out of the stadium or to go bust again? I think we know the answer to this.

He's one voice. Don't be so paranoid

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 5:35 pm  

Bubba wrote:

So you want free speech to be limited on the forum to something you agree with?

Ironically there is no free speech on there as I've been banned 7 times . He can crack on with his forum but should be nowhere near anything to do with the running of the shay.

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 5:46 pm  

Listenup94 wrote:

Ironically there is no free speech on there as I've been banned 7 times . He can crack on with his forum but should be nowhere near anything to do with the running of the shay.

That's incorrect. Gfn1 is still there,albeit under a different name. You've only been banned if you're being a dick or trolling. If you're making a fair argument, you wouldn't have been banned.

This forum used to be the worst for banning..
Hoddie was banned...which i think probably led to his low tolerance of RL trollls

Re: The Shay. : Sat Jan 04, 2025 5:57 pm  

Bubba wrote:

That's incorrect. Gfn1 is still there,albeit under a different name. You've only been banned if you're being a dick or trolling. If you're making a fair argument, you wouldn't have been banned.

This forum used to be the worst for banning..
Hoddie was banned...which i think probably led to his low tolerance of RL trollls

So my last ban was because I suggested back in June that fax were in dialogue with the Council regarding taking on the shay , and possible investment from the fraine bros and possibly others, to which flea said i was thick as mince , based on the warnings I had from hoddie regarding aggressive language I asked him to apply the same rules with him , his response was that certain loyal individuals were given special dispensation , so I replied no problem I will sort it out outside of the forum, then I was banned. Seems like the kind of fair impartial person we want involved in the running of the shay.