Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 5:55 am  

Hudd-Shay wrote:

The last i heard is that the clubs want Nigel Wood back! I despair if that's true.

It's all part of the masterplan to get bradford back in superleague.

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 8:18 am  

Listenup94 wrote:

It's all part of the masterplan to get bradford back in superleague.

Aye, Bradford for Salford anyone?

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:23 am  

Listenup94 wrote:

It's all part of the masterplan to get bradford back in superleague.

Well if getting Bradford back into Super League is the master plan frightening to think what the mini plan for the rest of us is.

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 10:10 am  

faxcar wrote:

Well if getting Bradford back into Super League is the master plan frightening to think what the mini plan for the rest of us is. :shock:

There isn't one. The rest don't count, SL and the RFL have made that abundantly clear...and we voted for it!

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 10:24 am  

My favourite gledhill moment was when he said he did the show impartially whilst wearing his bradford shirt.

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:20 am  

Hudd-Shay wrote:

There isn't one. The rest don't count, SL and the RFL have made that abundantly clear...and we voted for it!

You keep saying we voted for “it”, what actually is the “it” because if you mean IMG and what was proposed WHEN it was voted for things are a far cry from then to what it is NOW.

Many of the other clubs from Super League and Championships who voted for what was promised then are now seriously considering voting against it because of failure to deliver and have taken advice on whether they can or can’t remove IMG with conflicting conclusions, it’s briefly mentioned in the full 80.

Are you saying Fax and all the others outside Super League voted to have no plan for their clubs from the governing body or for them not to count?

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:22 am  

Listenup94 wrote:

My favourite gledhill moment was when he said he did the show impartially whilst wearing his bradford shirt.

My favourite Mick moment was when he finally stopped talking half an hour after saying he would be brief.

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:42 am  

faxcar wrote:

You keep saying we voted for “it”, what actually is the “it” because if you mean IMG and what was proposed WHEN it was voted for things are a far cry from then to what it is NOW.

Many of the other clubs from Super League and Championships who voted for what was promised then are now seriously considering voting against it because of failure to deliver and have taken advice on whether they can or can’t remove IMG with conflicting conclusions, it’s briefly mentioned in the full 80.

Are you saying Fax and all the others outside Super League voted to have no plan for their clubs from the governing body or for them not to count?

Whatever it was or is was never right for us.I firmly beleive we voted for it with a gun to our heads,which is the only reason I personally dont labour my objections to the whole charade..

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 12:10 pm  

Miserybusiness wrote:

Whatever it was or is was never right for us.I firmly beleive we voted for it with a gun to our heads,which is the only reason I personally dont labour my objections to the whole charade..

I’m led to believe the club asked around and spoke with their counterparts and with that feedback we fell into the category of realising our vote was meaningless as regards to the inevitable outcome and with or with out it our chance of progressing wouldn’t change much either so not so much a gun as opposed to there was little point in voting against it.

For some it’s just another thing to blame the club over.

Re: Forum at The Shay : Thu Feb 20, 2025 12:38 pm  

faxcar wrote:

I’m led to believe the club asked around and spoke with their counterparts and with that feedback we fell into the category of realising our vote was meaningless as regards to the inevitable outcome and with or with out it our chance of progressing wouldn’t change much either so not so much a gun as opposed to there was little point in voting against it.

For some it’s just another thing to blame the club over.

That is about it, meaningless. So why not say no, we'll vote against it as a protest? At least that way it would have shown we have a modicum of pride left in our club and wouldn't just follow on like the rest of the sheep.