Suspensions : Tue May 29, 2012 5:29 pm  

Ashall - 1 Game
Rettie - 4 Games (Minimum punishment for an E grade offence)

Re: Suspensions : Tue May 29, 2012 5:41 pm  

Personally I think Rettie is lucky to only get 4 games. We can use this weekends game for Ashall and one of Retties games.

Re: Suspensions : Tue May 29, 2012 7:24 pm  

Please can someone with a good working knowledge of the rfl disciplinary system tell me what the difference is between these http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3684 http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3354 And yes the grades are different!! But genuinely, how can there be a difference between strikes - headbutt, and headbutt? Surely it should all fall under the same grade? And this isn't a case of Rettie has been hard done by, Dickens wasn't, Fax v Fev, etc, it was an example of another player being found guilty of what I think is a similar offence. Rettie was found guilty so 6-8 matches is sufficient. But can anyone explain how the grading works in these instances? Thanks muchly

Please can someone with a good working knowledge of the rfl disciplinary system tell me what the difference is between these http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3684 http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3354 And yes the grades are different!! But genuinely, how can there be a difference between strikes - headbutt, and headbutt? Surely it should all fall under the same grade? And this isn't a case of Rettie has been hard done by, Dickens wasn't, Fax v Fev, etc, it was an example of another player being found guilty of what I think is a similar offence. Rettie was found guilty so 6-8 matches is sufficient. But can anyone explain how the grading works in these instances? Thanks muchly

Re: Suspensions : Tue May 29, 2012 11:29 pm  

Blue&White84 wrote: Please can someone with a good working knowledge of the rfl disciplinary system tell me what the difference is between these http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3684 http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3354 And yes the grades are different!! But genuinely, how can there be a difference between strikes - headbutt, and headbutt? Surely it should all fall under the same grade? And this isn't a case of Rettie has been hard done by, Dickens wasn't, Fax v Fev, etc, it was an example of another player being found guilty of what I think is a similar offence. Rettie was found guilty so 6-8 matches is sufficient. But can anyone explain how the grading works in these instances? Thanks muchly I can only think that Dickens must have a smaller/softer head. Alternatively, Reittie was referred to a tribunal but Dickens' case was heard by a, presumably more lenient, "tribubal".

Blue&White84 wrote: Please can someone with a good working knowledge of the rfl disciplinary system tell me what the difference is between these http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3684 http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3354 And yes the grades are different!! But genuinely, how can there be a difference between strikes - headbutt, and headbutt? Surely it should all fall under the same grade? And this isn't a case of Rettie has been hard done by, Dickens wasn't, Fax v Fev, etc, it was an example of another player being found guilty of what I think is a similar offence. Rettie was found guilty so 6-8 matches is sufficient. But can anyone explain how the grading works in these instances? Thanks muchly I can only think that Dickens must have a smaller/softer head. Alternatively, Reittie was referred to a tribunal but Dickens' case was heard by a, presumably more lenient, "tribubal".

Re: Suspensions : Wed May 30, 2012 6:05 am  

Gaz Hock got 2 matches for his headbutt. But he's Super League so that's alright.

Re: Suspensions : Wed May 30, 2012 9:19 am  

How many matches did danny maun get.
What was ashall's for?

Re: Suspensions : Wed May 30, 2012 9:30 am  

just read the disciplinary for maun. It says he just got involved in a confrontation with opponents which they say is sin bin sufficeint. But for ashall, (who in my opinion just dropped on a a player who had not been tackled, to have maun then start punching him) he gets a match ban for striking. How is that fair?

Re: Suspensions : Wed May 30, 2012 9:46 am  

JBFAX wrote:

How many matches did danny maun get.
What was ashall's for?

You didn't see Ashy throw a punch at the grounded player, the first punch..... ?

Re: Suspensions : Wed May 30, 2012 10:48 am  

marillion man wrote:

You didn't see Ashy throw a punch at the grounded player, the first punch..... ?

i thought he dropped on the untackled player in an aggresive way. i dont think he punched him or hit him high.

the way the game was boiling over at that point it was daft! but didnt warrant a suspension.

we're not playing tiddlywinks!

at least hell be available for Keighley though.

Re: Suspensions : Wed May 30, 2012 11:08 am  

SIMMSFAXTEDDY wrote:

i thought he dropped on the untackled player in an aggresive way. i dont think he punched him or hit him high.

the way the game was boiling over at that point it was daft! but didnt warrant a suspension.

we're not playing tiddlywinks!

at least hell be available for Keighley though.

Oh he definately punched the untackled player whilst he was on the ground. No drama with him getting a one match ban, as we can run this ban out with the french game.