Re: Bulls : Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:56 pm  

Faxfan1999 wrote:

If Fax were in the position of the Bulls are you saying they should not appeal? Personally I dont feel any ill will towards the Bulls and all those who are having a good laugh should think of that next time they are upset by the comments of a FC Halifax 'Fan' towards Fax. Basically because you are no better than them , put your bitterness aside if the Bulls had won their appeal it would have set the precedent for any future appeals - maybe by Fax in the future....

If they do manage to survive in Super League fair play to them if not then see you at The Shay in 2015.

for me and I think a few on here its to do with them affecting our future as well as there own with their stupidity.
they gave out free tickets all over Calderdale taking our at the time paying custom which had a massive affect on our income. to top it off this backfired on themselves as there was never a real income to cover this. now the giants are at it giving free and cheap tickets to all games to try and make it look good but in the end these people just wont want to pay when things get hard for the club.
I could go all day in more detail but I cant be ar*ed as most people on here and our club itself know this.

Re: Bulls : Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:28 pm  

lmw wrote:

for me and I think a few on here its to do with them affecting our future as well as there own with their stupidity.
they gave out free tickets all over Calderdale taking our at the time paying custom which had a massive affect on our income. to top it off this backfired on themselves as there was never a real income to cover this. now the giants are at it giving free and cheap tickets to all games to try and make it look good but in the end these people just wont want to pay when things get hard for the club.
I could go all day in more detail but I cant be ar*ed as most people on here and our club itself know this.

100% correct. Stuff the bulls!

Re: Bulls : Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:35 pm  

lmw wrote:

for me and I think a few on here its to do with them affecting our future as well as there own with their stupidity.
they gave out free tickets all over Calderdale taking our at the time paying custom which had a massive affect on our income. to top it off this backfired on themselves as there was never a real income to cover this. now the giants are at it giving free and cheap tickets to all games to try and make it look good but in the end these people just wont want to pay when things get hard for the club.
I could go all day in more detail but I cant be ar*ed as most people on here and our club itself know this.

Absolutely spot on . I definitely have no sympathy for Bradfraud Bulls.

Re: Bulls : Fri Jun 13, 2014 6:57 pm  

halifaxjohn wrote:

Wouldn't any club appeal?
Where in the rule book does it say you can't appeal?
Obviously glad the appeal was rejected but take no satisfaction in their demise.
Hope they will bring a big crowd to the Shay next year.

Blimey, I'm living dangerously these last few days, alifax has had a good go at me, but hey me down if you want.
Haven,t we had a period where a man with money backed us? What happened when he walked away? No not talking about now!
Talking about our modern great years.
I repeat I take no satisfaction in ANY teams demise.
Ps unless it was that waste of space team in South Yorkshire.
O'sh elite I've done it again.

Re: Bulls : Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:49 pm  

Relegation will do the two clubs that hit the drop the world of good i reckon, they'll have much more of a financial package than their opponents as a "reward" for being rubbish this year and it'll be even more of an uneven playing field than it is now below SL level.

Only my thoughts, i'm probably way off the mark anyway. Its the RFL, it's bound to go wrong.

Re: Bulls : Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:46 am  

Says in RLE that the Bulls could appeal the appeal!!

Re: Bulls : Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:00 pm  

Know its off topic but forgot at add that Manning could be banned for up to 13 matches for a grade d and e offences - dont think he can submit an EGP (but might be wrong) , hopefully he wont get that long.

Re: Bulls : Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:47 pm  

Faxfan1999 wrote:

Know its off topic but forgot at add that Manning could be banned for up to 13 matches for a grade d and e offences - dont think he can submit an EGP (but might be wrong) , hopefully he wont get that long.

That's if you add together the maximum penalty for both offences. As they were only 40 seconds apart and, in effect, one incident surely the panel won't treat them as 2 totally seperate incidents?

Re: Bulls : Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:02 pm  

Faxfan1999 wrote:

Know its off topic but forgot at add that Manning could be banned for up to 13 matches for a grade d and e offences - dont think he can submit an EGP (but might be wrong) , hopefully he wont get that long.

He has definately used his AGP already this season.

Re: Bulls : Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:15 pm  

Credit to the club for getting a solicitor involved because anyone who has seen the tackle over and over who thinks it is either a shoulder charge or an attack to the head must be on a different planet.