Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 6:36 pm  

The bloke is/was useless. He costs us more than he scores for us. Unbelievable that we've brought him back. Must have been cheap. Dissolusined.

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 6:41 pm  

The pass was not that bad to be honest but unfortunately Worrincy has never had the best pair of hands. You could name a number of incidents that contributed to the loss like a sin bin for a tackle that did not appear to be high, a try ruled out where it looked like we had scored in the corner, a possible knock on on Fev's last try. We did not lose the game because of one mistake.

I thought we went pretty well overall and our superior fitness was showing in the 2nd half when we lost a bit of momentum after the sin binning but Fev were blowing so hard at that point they had no choice but to take the 2 rather than keep us under the cosh and then it came down to the last try which was fortunate at best and a knock on at worst.

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 6:42 pm  

Hudd-Shay wrote:

The bloke is/was useless. He costs us more than he scores for us. Unbelievable that we've brought him back. Must have been cheap. Dissolusined.

Im sorry but you are clueless.

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 7:41 pm  

It didn't look like it at 14-0 down, but it ended up a really tight game that could have gone either way.

Rob didn't have a great game, but it was possibly the sin-bin that did the most damage given the way we started the second half.

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 7:49 pm  

Rob will be disappointed too, lets not forget that, and Rob didn't ping us down the field like a certain Childs did. The pass wasn't great, the pat back wasn't great either, the dropped ball on the kick return wasn't great either. On the plus side he made some good yards and got us on the front foot, he scored a try with the first time he received an attacking pass from us.
He didn't have a great one, he doesn't deserve a public flogging though. They will all be hurting.

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:09 pm  

Hudd-Shay wrote:

The bloke is/was useless. He costs us more than he scores for us. Unbelievable that we've brought him back. Must have been cheap. Dissolusined.

Perhaps you'd have preferred if we had got a dual reg winger in from Salford instead then?

Get behind the lads in blue and white.
Rob is a confidence player and he knows better than anyone it wasn't his best today. He doesn't need people saying these things about him.
Will you still be slagging him when he runs in an 80 yarder?

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:32 pm  

dazednconfused wrote:

Perhaps you'd have preferred if we had got a dual reg winger in from Salford instead then?

Get behind the lads in blue and white.
Rob is a confidence player and he knows better than anyone it wasn't his best today. He doesn't need people saying these things about him.
Will you still be slagging him when he runs in an 80 yarder?

When did he last do that? I'm as blue and white as anyone but time after time Rob costs us games. Open your eyes!

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:40 pm  

So, you still didn't answer me, would you prefer it if we had a dual reg winger instead?

Re: Rob Worrincy : Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:42 pm  

He's also cost us a few games in a Sheffield shirt by skipping over wide out, he didn't lose us the game, we should have and could have won it at 26-24. same old Rob, some mistakes, but he'll be our top try scorer and last year we might just have made the top 4 if we had him. You know what you're getting, he balances out as positive overall all in a season its just frustrating when the back 3 blunders get exposed so brutally, especially in the final 10 mins.

Re: Rob Worrincy to : Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:48 pm  

dazednconfused wrote:

So, you still didn't answer me, would you prefer it if we had a dual reg winger instead?

So....no.