Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:14 pm  

mr t hall wrote:

The very fellow.

Can you tell him to change his water, he's leaving a smudge mark.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:01 am  

Fax Machine wrote:

They seem to have stopped updating this. Can't understand why. Nevermind, I'll do it for them.

THE BOBBY HAM BEGGAR METER - 11 Games Target - 17,600 Current Total - 15,990 = Deficit 1,610

(I've been kind to them and stuck with the original match target of 1,600)

Original match target? You mean the one that still stands and hasn't changed?

The target is based on league games only and does not include any extra income from cup games. We got half the gate receipts from the MK game and we have the FA Trophy game at home in a couple of weeks.

Obviously crowds are a problem but then again they are for both clubs. What was your average last season? How many did you get for the semi final?

Don't worry about us. We are £200,000k in the black. Rather than bury your head in the sand, you should worry about your own club being £250k in the red as well as owing the council over £60k.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:05 am  

Never_Shay_Die wrote:

Original match target? You mean the one that still stands and hasn't changed?

The target is based on league games only and does not include any extra income from cup games. We got half the gate receipts from the MK game and we have the FA Trophy game at home in a couple of weeks.

Obviously crowds are a problem but then again they are for both clubs. What was your average last season? How many did you get for the semi final?

Don't worry about us. We are £200,000k in the black. Rather than bury your head in the sand, you should worry about your own club being £250k in the red as well as owing the council over £60k.

All your posts show what a bitter little man you are. Even Supergeoff can enter into a little banter occasionally.
"Never shat die" run along, there's a good boy.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:38 am  

halifaxjohn wrote:

All your posts show what a bitter little man you are. Even Supergeoff can enter into a little banter occasionally.
"Never shat die" run along, there's a good boy.

What???? Bitter??? Really???? What's so bitter about my post? Please explain because it seems you fail to understand the meaning of the word.

I'm not bitter at all. It was Fax Machine who posted a comment about our attendances and to which I was replying. It included a downright lie that our target attendance has changed. I'm not sure what the point of his post was other than to try and have a dig at FCHT (despite your fans being 'above' Town fans of course).

I responded with a sensible post about the defecit being recovered through cup games and that crowds are low for both clubs - was that not a fair comment? I then suggested that you might want to consider your own club's financial position.

Nothing bitter. Please use the dictionary next time.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:57 am  

How much of the 150K is directors loans? How is that split per Director? How much does the club owe the taxman?

May as well ask NSD, he seems to have all the answers.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:15 am  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

How much of the 150K is directors loans? How is that split per Director? How much does the club owe the taxman?

Do you know?

Where is the figure of 150k coming from? That's new. Which club are you referring to?

We we're £170k in the black at last accounts (that's NET e.g. after tax liabilities etc). The rugby were £250k in the red (again NET), plus the £60k owed to the council for rent is not in dispute.

I'm not saying I know all the answers, only the facts of which I am aware. But your ignorance to the matter is alarming. You should be asking your club these questions rather than burying your head in the sand.

Perhaps it's because you hate your club so much that you really don't care.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:57 am  

Never_Shay_Die wrote:

Do you know?

Where is the figure of 150k coming from? That's new. Which club are you referring to?

We we're £170k in the black at last accounts (that's NET e.g. after tax liabilities etc). The rugby were £250k in the red (again NET), plus the £60k owed to the council for rent is not in dispute.

I'm not saying I know all the answers, only the facts of which I am aware. But your ignorance to the matter is alarming. You should be asking your club these questions rather than burying your head in the sand.

Perhaps it's because you hate your club so much that you really don't care.

Ok then 250K, how much is Directors loans? How is it split per Director? How much do we owe the taxman?

You seem to have all the answers so feel free to enlighten us.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:05 pm  

Never_Shay_Die wrote:

Original match target? You mean the one that still stands and hasn't changed?

The target is based on league games only and does not include any extra income from cup games. We got half the gate receipts from the MK game and we have the FA Trophy game at home in a couple of weeks.

Obviously crowds are a problem but then again they are for both clubs. What was your average last season? How many did you get for the semi final?

Don't worry about us. We are £200,000k in the black. Rather than bury your head in the sand, you should worry about your own club being £250k in the red as well as owing the council over £60k.

You're 200 million pounds in the black? That's unbelievable.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:11 pm  

Fax Machine wrote:

You're 200 million pounds in the black? That's unbelievable.

Remember NSD only sticks to the facts as he knows them.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:34 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

:lol: Remember NSD only sticks to the facts as he knows them.

So he knows that he is a little bit thick then. As that seems like a fact.