I have a few points, they might be wrong but here they are.
What do the events at Salford prove or change anyway as regards Super League.
Nothing that we didn't allready know.
1.)The licensing system that claimed to vet the current clubs missed more than they saw and in many ways the clubs are there under a cloud of incompetance from the powers that be.
2.)Without a wealthy backer clubs will struggle both on and off the field.
3.)These teams remain a viable member of Super League just as long as the current backer or a replacement stays with the club or they become unsustainable at that level.
4.)Unless the team plays consistently well people won't turn up.
5.)In time more and more will stop coming.
6.)Those that do stop will find alternatives and many will never come back.
7.)The vast majority of the Super League games involving teams in the middle to bottom half of the table screened live on TV to a National audience are of an embarrisingly poor standard.
8.)They will not attract new interest regardless of how hard the Sky pundits keep saying the competition keeps getting better and better.
9.)To stop this there is a real need to produce more better quality home grown Rugby League players.
10.) How will this be done if the teams outside S/L get left to die off and at the same time the junior competitons are culled back with the door being shut on much of the games youth.
11.) How long will the chairmen and directors of clubs outside Super League keep self sacrificing money, time and effort into a cul de sac competition with no hope or chance to progress.
That is what is happening now with the current RFL iditos in charge, how can that be for the good of the game at any and all levels.