Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:04 am  

a.n Other wrote:

Why does this bother you so much? What's your knowledge of the situation and the impact it had on your club?

I am NOT dragging that up. Sorry. You know damn well what the issues were.

I know some of you will say "Oooooooooh it's because he doesn't know" like a set of old women. But the fact is it will simply open up another can of worms which I really can't be bothered with.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:05 am  

Never_Shay_Die wrote: You're right, I was getting mixed up with the original poster. Who had in fact posted a lie. Which was my original point. Nope, I don't condemn insults at all. You guys do though in a desperate bid to claim a moral high ground on the football fans, yet post as much drivel and throw as much mud yourselves. THAT's hypocritical. Glad we agree re: private ownership. As for the Bubba comment - sarcasm is lost in the world of peanut hugging clearly. However my position on private ownership has not changed in my life so I'm not being hypocritical at all. Most HRLFC fans however... Loving the moral high ground with your last two paragraphs too!! Some of the crap I've read on here and read/heard from rugby fans throughout the last 2-3 months has been laughable, with clear bitterness that the football fans did not bow down to your supreme leader TA, with insults and childish mudslinging galore. I will admit that after the history between the clubs, starting with the Thrum Hall funds fiasco and cumulating with the latest friction between the clubs over the sale of The Shay, I have little time for your club. But by pleading 'bitterness' every time you hear something you don't like you just sound like a set or morons. Condone? Actually your right in one of your posts to me, it is getting tedious, every time we cast our rods we come back with the same flounder, it's not sport anymore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0k0z_V0iuc Prefer Bob Dylan's version.

Never_Shay_Die wrote: You're right, I was getting mixed up with the original poster. Who had in fact posted a lie. Which was my original point. Nope, I don't condemn insults at all. You guys do though in a desperate bid to claim a moral high ground on the football fans, yet post as much drivel and throw as much mud yourselves. THAT's hypocritical. Glad we agree re: private ownership. As for the Bubba comment - sarcasm is lost in the world of peanut hugging clearly. However my position on private ownership has not changed in my life so I'm not being hypocritical at all. Most HRLFC fans however... Loving the moral high ground with your last two paragraphs too!! Some of the crap I've read on here and read/heard from rugby fans throughout the last 2-3 months has been laughable, with clear bitterness that the football fans did not bow down to your supreme leader TA, with insults and childish mudslinging galore. I will admit that after the history between the clubs, starting with the Thrum Hall funds fiasco and cumulating with the latest friction between the clubs over the sale of The Shay, I have little time for your club. But by pleading 'bitterness' every time you hear something you don't like you just sound like a set or morons. Condone? Actually your right in one of your posts to me, it is getting tedious, every time we cast our rods we come back with the same flounder, it's not sport anymore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0k0z_V0iuc Prefer Bob Dylan's version.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:12 am  

halifaxjohn wrote: Condone? Actually your right in one of your posts to me, it is getting tedious, every time we cast our rods we come back with the same flounder, it's not sport anymore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0k0z_V0iuc Prefer Bob Dylan's version. No, condemn was the correct word. Cast your rod That's priceless.

halifaxjohn wrote: Condone? Actually your right in one of your posts to me, it is getting tedious, every time we cast our rods we come back with the same flounder, it's not sport anymore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0k0z_V0iuc Prefer Bob Dylan's version. No, condemn was the correct word. Cast your rod That's priceless.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:36 am  

Are you suggesting that's the wrong term?

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:01 am  

Never_Shay_Die wrote:

I am NOT dragging that up. Sorry. You know damn well what the issues were.

I know some of you will say "Oooooooooh it's because he doesn't know" like a set of old women. But the fact is it will simply open up another can of worms which I really can't be bothered with.

We know damn well what you THINK the issues were.

"set of old women"? Oh, the irony.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:38 pm  

Fax Machine wrote:

Christ! Can't SG and NSD just do one (or preferably two).

They really are getting boring now. Our BOD seem to be well on with preparing for the new season, have already launched the new shirt which carries record sponsorship and have signed some very promising players. We certainly don't look like a club "in crisis". Unlike FCHT fans I do not believe that we need constant access to the accounts. It is not our business and it is certainly none of FCHT's business. Why are they so interested? I'm not the slightest bit interested in their affairs. I go to the Shay to watch Rugby League not stare at a set of accounts. As to the outstanding rent, it has been announced that the club have reached agreement with CMBC on a scheduled repayment. That is between Halifax RLFC and THEIR LANDLORDS. They do not have to inform FCHT or it's cohorts.

Bradford Bulls did not look like a club in crisis either, Both clubs need each other, the shay is not viable with one club so it is 'FCHTs Business'. The Landlords' are a public accountable body, so yes they should inform the public.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:45 pm  

Never_Shay_Die wrote:

I will admit that after the history between the clubs, starting with the Thrum Hall funds fiasco and cumulating with the latest friction between the clubs over the sale of The Shay, I have little time for your club. But by pleading 'bitterness' every time you hear something you don't like you just sound like a set or morons.

You are going to have even less time for our club in the near future then.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:22 pm  

Never_Shay_Die wrote:

You're right, I was getting mixed up with the original poster. Who had in fact posted a lie. Which was my original point.

Nope, I don't condemn insults at all. You guys do though in a desperate bid to claim a moral high ground on the football fans, yet post as much drivel and throw as much mud yourselves. THAT's hypocritical.

Glad we agree re: private ownership. As for the Bubba comment - sarcasm is lost in the world of peanut hugging clearly. However my position on private ownership has not changed in my life so I'm not being hypocritical at all. Most HRLFC fans however...

Loving the moral high ground with your last two paragraphs too!! Some of the crap I've read on here and read/heard from rugby fans throughout the last 2-3 months has been laughable, with clear bitterness that the football fans did not bow down to your supreme leader TA, with insults and childish mudslinging galore.

I will admit that after the history between the clubs, starting with the Thrum Hall funds fiasco and cumulating with the latest friction between the clubs over the sale of The Shay, I have little time for your club. But by pleading 'bitterness' every time you hear something you don't like you just sound like a set or morons.

:

So even when you are wrong as admitted by yourself you still throw up more insults, by doing so you step off any moral ground.


How hard is it for you to understand what actually happened, a discussion was held between the council and TA which led to an offer being put in for the Shay and which has subsequently been rejected.
What happens next as even the Town BOD said we don't know.

The onslaught from a small minority of Town is well documented and went beyond petitioning or persuading the council to think again and you can't keep that quiet or.

We know what was done and by whom it was done.

It involved and still involves personal attacks on TA and his young family, these actions which started with Town fans is real moronic behaviour.

These actions alone were what led to many Fax fans and other people giving support to him as a person, it had nothing to do with the sale of the Shay which became a side issue.

This is a world apart from blindly following or bowing down to him as you keep saying concerning his bid for the Shay but if that thinking feeds your set appetite, keep eating yourself up.

It's all in your mind and at end of the day you have to live with yourself.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:32 pm  

I'm planning on a joint club carol singing extravaganza this year.

Who's with me?

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:37 pm  

littlerich wrote:

I'm planning on a joint club carol singing extravaganza this year.

Who's with me?

Will people be allowed to throw flares?