Re: Wakefield : Sat May 28, 2011 10:36 am  

Skipdog wrote:

Guy at Wakey didn't say which ref told them they were ok for SL but they way the RFL is run it is quite likely that the refs wil be told which grounds they will be reffing at next season before the clubs find out.

Clutching at straws there! Why would they need to be telling refs about the 2012 season now???

Re: Wakefield : Sat May 28, 2011 2:00 pm  

HXSparky wrote:

Clutching at straws there! Why would they need to be telling refs about the 2012 season now???

Because they are idiots maybe?

Re: Wakefield : Sat May 28, 2011 6:11 pm  

But, back to the point of this thread, I would have thought that, even if Wakefield weren't in Super League next season they'd want to keep a talented young local player who wanted nothing more than to play for them. Therefore, why insert such a clause?

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 6:35 am  

Skipdog wrote:

Guy at Wakey didn't say which ref told them they were ok for SL but they way the RFL is run it is quite likely that the refs wil be told which grounds they will be reffing at next season before the clubs find out.

I've read some twaddle on here over the years but this is a corker !

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 7:48 am  

That was my response when he said it

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 8:13 am  

Officeboy wrote: But, back to the point of this thread, I would have thought that, even if Wakefield weren't in Super League next season they'd want to keep a talented young local player who wanted nothing more than to play for them. Therefore, why insert such a clause? Well they have. http://www.howesetc.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=110&Itemid=27 At the bottom of the page it states Wilde is out of contract if Wakey are relegated.

Officeboy wrote: But, back to the point of this thread, I would have thought that, even if Wakefield weren't in Super League next season they'd want to keep a talented young local player who wanted nothing more than to play for them. Therefore, why insert such a clause? Well they have. http://www.howesetc.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=110&Itemid=27 At the bottom of the page it states Wilde is out of contract if Wakey are relegated.

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 9:10 am  

I don't like seeing that Makka and blacky are out of contract on Wednesday, saying that shad is there too.

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 10:27 am  

it must just be that they can talk to clubs about deals for next year i know greg worthington who is on thier has a deal at fev till the end of the season

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 11:45 am  

a.n Other wrote: Well they have. http://www.howesetc.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=110&Itemid=27 At the bottom of the page it states Wilde is out of contract if Wakey are relegated. It'll be the agent that insisted on that.

a.n Other wrote: Well they have. http://www.howesetc.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=110&Itemid=27 At the bottom of the page it states Wilde is out of contract if Wakey are relegated. It'll be the agent that insisted on that.

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 29, 2011 12:05 pm  

Tbf can't blame them as IF they do stay in SL they'd be a bit gutted if they then lost all their best players / youngsters because contracts are out!

Wouldn't be surprised if with these young lads they discuss dual terms in case they do go down. We used to it in 2006 / 2007 one contract if SL / one contract of NL!