Re: South Stand restrictions : Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:04 pm
halifaxjohn wrote:
Your quite right Binboy, a "bloody disgrace" as you say.
Of course as our resident double supporter Mr T Hall has quite rightly and fairly pointed out it was Mr Ample Bosomworth, your chairman who requested this decision.
I suspect that as cost saving exercise it does save Fax £100, two stewards, but, think about it logically it's saving your football club probably in excess of £1000 pounds for a smaller crowd plus a fortune in hay for all those police horses.
Now may I respectfully request that you give us all a break, next thing you will be speaking in pseudo Yorkshire dialect which will only encourage Cokey to return like he did when his mate Jagger (not Charlie) was on.
With respect as always of course.
Of course as our resident double supporter Mr T Hall has quite rightly and fairly pointed out it was Mr Ample Bosomworth, your chairman who requested this decision.
I suspect that as cost saving exercise it does save Fax £100, two stewards, but, think about it logically it's saving your football club probably in excess of £1000 pounds for a smaller crowd plus a fortune in hay for all those police horses.
Now may I respectfully request that you give us all a break, next thing you will be speaking in pseudo Yorkshire dialect which will only encourage Cokey to return like he did when his mate Jagger (not Charlie) was on.
With respect as always of course.
Nice dig John boy.........Saddo
You seem to be coming across to me as a nasty piece of work lately. What's your problem?