: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:04 am  

I suggest some Asbestos roofing at Natty Lane for the football team

Further accusations from the wendyballers! : Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:30 pm  

http://www.theshaymen.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2567 As I understand it, even on an internet message board it is still libel if incorrect. Therefore, can someone from the club tell us if it is true? Also, is the accusation of unpaid money to Brighouse true (on the same board)? If not, I genuinely believe that it is time to take legal action as to do nothing is tantamount to acceptance of the accusations as fact and this can only damage the club in terms of credibility and, therefore, support.

http://www.theshaymen.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2567 As I understand it, even on an internet message board it is still libel if incorrect. Therefore, can someone from the club tell us if it is true? Also, is the accusation of unpaid money to Brighouse true (on the same board)? If not, I genuinely believe that it is time to take legal action as to do nothing is tantamount to acceptance of the accusations as fact and this can only damage the club in terms of credibility and, therefore, support.

[triran]

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:11 pm  

Please be careful of what we say - otherwise we will have to lock this thread.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:19 pm  

Similar accusations were made on the Courier Website in the comments section a week or so ago

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:31 pm  

idiots! I bet they are the ones who blame the Germans for bombing their chippy!!!! Let it go lads.. your grown men! Do they realise how embarassing their comments are to the people who are genuine supporters of the clubs accept that both clubs play there

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:32 pm  

griffax wrote:

idiots! I bet they are the ones who blame the Germans for bombing their chippy!!!! Let it go lads.. your grown men! Do they realise how embarassing their comments are to the people who are genuine supporters of the clubs accept that both clubs play there

Doubtful.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:40 pm  

urbancarrot wrote:

Doubtful.

true.

only 866 turned up last night... there will be no one left supporting them to whine on! Nice to read all the "supportive" comments the fans have been shouting to the players.... with so few in the ground the players will have heard them all! Keep up the great support lads!

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:00 pm  

griffax wrote:

true.

only 866 turned up last night... there will be no one left supporting them to whine on! Nice to read all the "supportive" comments the fans have been shouting to the players.... with so few in the ground the players will have heard them all! Keep up the great support lads!

yep and when all your glory trippers come back thast went to thrum hall when you were there come back when we start winning things.

didn the rugby only get 1100 for there challenge cup game and siddal got the same crowd. 880 and 1100 not really much of a difference.

but we played that match on a tuesday night everyone knows that crowds at lower clubs go down for mid week matches we will be back up at 1300 or 1400 on saturday for woodley sports.

whereas halifax rlfc played on a sunday and siddal played on the saturday so its not really any better the rugby's challenge cup crowd.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:24 pm  

Had the Siddal game been on the Sunday I think the attendance would have been closer to 2000 as a lot of people from the local teams would have gone to watch.

This squabbling between both sets of fans really is pathetic though.

: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:31 pm  

Leon Ashton wrote:

Had the Siddal game been on the Sunday I think the attendance would have been closer to 2000 as a lot of people from the local teams would have gone to watch.

This squabbling between both sets of fans really is pathetic though.

Totally agree...!