Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:26 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Leigh 46
Fax 8

I fear this game to be honest. A massive improvement is needed on the Sheffield performance if we are to even get a sniff in this match. This prediction says more about Leigh though - they are extremely good this year.

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:30 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Leigh 46
Fax 8

I fear this game to be honest. A massive improvement is needed on the Sheffield performance if we are to even get a sniff in this match. This prediction says more about Leigh though - they are extremely good this year.

Shame on you bitchman shame on you.

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:36 pm  

peice of p**s was that, onwards and upwards now

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:37 pm  

awesome performance, well done FAX, up the league we go!

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:44 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

Shame on you bitchman shame on you.

I am full of remorse. Shame on me

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:03 pm  

But for our 'off the field' activities, we'd have won by 50 !!!!



only kidding, WELL PLAYED FAX - couldn't believe that 1st half, guess you guys couldn't have either. Obviously you have the players to beat us, but 6-32.
I feel like kicking the cat, but it's out $hagging.

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:13 pm  

littlerich wrote:

I am full of remorse. Shame on me

'nobber!

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:14 pm  

Tony Fax wrote:

'nobber!

Get back in your box old man

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:46 pm  

SIMMSFAXTEDDY wrote:

If penky doesnt play we wont get close.

Hahahahaha! And, what do you know?

Re: Leigh v Fax : Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:56 pm  

You'd have had 50 if Penky was playing. Unreal performance from 'Fax, made us look VERY ordinary, though we didn't need too much help in that regard! The old Noble trick of "hitting form" maybe?!