Re: Hooker issue : Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:14 pm  

Fisher has been a quality player but will be 33 in Feb.
Karl did show some interest in him last year but his release from HKR came when most of the money had been spent on other players.
Can't totally write him off but I would have thought we would be after someone younger.

Re: Hooker issue : Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:12 pm  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

Genuine question. Do you really think Handforth is up to a defensive stint that a hooker has to put in every game?

Handforth is a scrum half, and a bloody good one.

Re: Hooker issue : Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:24 pm  

Ellis please

Re: Hooker issue : Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:48 pm  

Is Bob Beswick tied up at Leigh?

Re: Hooker issue : Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:07 pm  

Zaphod_B wrote:

Is Bob Beswick tied up at Leigh?

yes, just signed a 2 year deal,,,,

Re: Hooker issue : Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:57 pm  

Shame...

Re: Hooker issue : Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:19 pm  

Ellis or Murrell?

Re: Hooker issue : Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:55 pm  

SIMMSFAXTEDDY wrote:

Ellis or Murrell?

ellis all the way for me, great player at this level. but somehow cant see it happening.

[triran]

Re: Hooker issue : Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:49 pm  

swifty62 wrote:

ellis all the way for me, great player at this level. but somehow cant see it happening.

Isn't he playing at 9 for Wakey regularly now?

Re: Hooker issue : Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:17 pm  

Might be a couple worth looking at on Lumb lane unless there now employed by the Bulls on corporate Hospitality Duties.