Re: Matthew Haggerty : Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:04 am  

We can't afford to have anyone with that attitude next season-get shut.Looked a good player 2015 good speed and offloads,didn't look interested for most of 2016.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:38 pm  

mr t hall wrote:

We can't afford to have anyone with that attitude next season-get shut.Looked a good player 2015 good speed and offloads,didn't look interested for most of 2016.

Agree TH one of things that must be right next year from the players is attitude and it needs to be 110% behind the club.

He was the one I mentioned when away at Oldham messing around on the touchline not even watching the game not only showing no interest but disrupting others as well.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:16 pm  

Well he was handing out chocolate bars on Saturday so that to me shows commitment and good attitude, he obviously feels part of the team so let's give him a chance to show it rather than speculate somebody who is here isn't bothered. We have enough issues without this sort of speculation.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:58 pm  

A mainstay of the team as far as I'm concerned.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:09 pm  

I believe he turned down a full time contract with Seagulls in 2016 to sign for us on less money.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:41 pm  

halifaxjohn wrote:

I believe he turned down a full time contract with Seagulls in 2016 to sign for us on less money.

I believe that too. My view is that he's a good lad who with a kick up the ar*e will be one of our best players in 2017.

Has potential. Needs to deliver it before it is too late.

Just my humble opinion.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:52 pm  

swifty62 wrote:

and back on subject, anyone know who the other player not yet signed for the coming season.

Out of interest where did this come from,the club announcement about Manning said he was the only player to not accept the paycut ?

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:23 pm  

mr t hall wrote:

Out of interest where did this come from,the club announcement about Manning said he was the only player to not accept the paycut ?

Probably wanted to keep it hush hush, despite our results last season we do have some players that would be desirable to the top teams in the division and if they get wind and start sniffing around then they might be able to tempt them away. In Batley's case they signed our player while still under contract and we ended up with a fee that probably only just breaks the 1k mark.

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Tue Nov 29, 2016 7:06 pm  

mr t hall wrote: Out of interest where did this come from,the club announcement about Manning said he was the only player to not accept the paycut ? It was mentioned here... http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/sport/rugby/halifax-rlfc/fax-close-to-agreeing-dual-registration-deal-1-8257958

mr t hall wrote: Out of interest where did this come from,the club announcement about Manning said he was the only player to not accept the paycut ? It was mentioned here... http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/sport/rugby/halifax-rlfc/fax-close-to-agreeing-dual-registration-deal-1-8257958

Re: Matthew Haggerty : Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:53 pm  

HXSparky wrote: It was mentioned here... http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/sport/rugby/halifax-rlfc/fax-close-to-agreeing-dual-registration-deal-1-8257958 Thank you,i remember seeing that article,but obviously didn't read it properly.

HXSparky wrote: It was mentioned here... http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/sport/rugby/halifax-rlfc/fax-close-to-agreeing-dual-registration-deal-1-8257958 Thank you,i remember seeing that article,but obviously didn't read it properly.