Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:16 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

Theres some good people in there that got shat on and would have struggled because of their lack of payment.

On the plus side it looks like they kept their rent payments up to date, either that or the council simply wrote them off.

They owed Calderdale Council £587,11 and the Shay stadium trust £14,100

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:19 pm  

Maybe as rugby fans we should all be emailing Councillor Swift demanding if the £587.11 was owed due to rent.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:28 pm  

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:23 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

Theres some good people in there that got shat on and would have struggled because of their lack of payment.

On the plus side it looks like they kept their rent payments up to date, either that or the council simply wrote them off.

I don`t think they paid their rent to the Council then , it was paid to the SST so hence the £14,000 owed to them and was probably one of the reasons why they had to wind up due to lack of funds.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:46 pm  

I like this one, Football Trust, 25, Soho Square, London, £ 56,000;

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:03 pm  

http://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/index.php ... ers-trust/[/url] Words fail me at the moment .

http://www.theshaymen.net/ipb/index.php ... ers-trust/[/url] Words fail me at the moment .

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:59 pm  

Firstly, either we're a new club and "you've been playing at The Shay longer than us" or we're a continuation of the old club in which case you can try to throw the past at us. Can't have it both ways I'm afraid.

Secondly, if you're dragging up the past, a big chunk of those liabilities were caused by the failure of the rugby club to invest the Thrum Hall money in The Shay as promised. You'll find that's the reason why The Football Trust were on that list.

Thirdly, the SST didn't go bust at all.

Fourthly, look at Johnny Freeman Fan Club's signature. "Learn from the past". You seem to be using our previous problems as some kind of justification for being £250,000 in the red and over 12 months in rent arrears. We're a prime example of what happens when you don't pay what you owe or ignore the warning signs and just expect things to 'sort themselves out'.

So moving to the ever more relevant present why not worry about your own 6 figure liabilities, stop burying your heads in the stand and demand answers from your club as to how the debt is going to be managed.

Good luck.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 7:00 pm  

You going to be letting of flares again like idiots tomorrow? Maybe one of your lot will get arrested or banned like a number of others have in the past.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:21 pm  

The Lucky Black Cat wrote:

You going to be letting of flares again like idiots tomorrow? Maybe one of your lot will get arrested or banned like a number of others have in the past.

Or having a go at the Italian RL team who have nowt to do with any of this, totally moronic and an embarrassment to Halifax.

Re: FCHT directors view re. shay : Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:28 pm  

Fax4Life wrote:

Or having a go at the Italian RL team who have nowt to do with any of this, totally moronic and an embarrassment to Halifax.

Quite agree, as the Italian team arrived on the Saturday for a training session the AFC Halifax Town "supporters" were getting in to their taxi's for the trip to MK Dons, there behaviour was a disgrace.