Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:58 pm  

freddies wig wrote:

So Sky and the RFL would put a club into SL that regularly gets to mid season then runs out if money, Cos they play in a functional modern stadium that they don't own? Really?

Must be something in the Lancashire air

I think sky love the lsv because they can just turn up,plug in and start filming,which saves them an awful lot of money

Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:02 pm  

Starbug wrote:

Have you seen smokeys post on the VT ? , he suggests a 30 match season can be done with 13 teams

I don't know how you have the patience with that mathematical Magic Weekend statistic. You've been putting people right on that for months and months and months. Douchebags.

Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:04 pm  

littlerich wrote:

I don't know how you have the patience with that mathematical Magic Weekend statistic. You've been putting people right on that for months and months and months. Douchebags.

Its years , not months , but smokey not thinking it through just makes it even better

And I'm not an accountant

Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:04 pm  

j.c wrote:

I think sky love the lsv because they can just turn up,plug in and start filming,which saves them an awful lot of money

After they have plugged in and started filming I think they will be interested in how many have plugged in and turned on at home to watch the show.

Wasn't it Fax that had the highest viewing figures from the Championship on a fairly regular basis when it was under the Sky people?

Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:06 pm  

faxcar wrote:

After they ahve plugged in and started filming I think they will be interested in how many have plugged in and turned on at home to watch the show.

Wasn't it Fax that had the highest viewing figures from the championship on a fairly regular basis when it was under the Sky people?

Probably , but that was when you played decent RL in 2011 BK

Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:18 pm  

littlerich wrote:

I don't know how you have the patience with that mathematical Magic Weekend statistic. You've been putting people right on that for months and months and months. Douchebags.

Just got another one

Re: Fev for SL : Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:20 pm  

faxcar wrote:

After they have plugged in and started filming I think they will be interested in how many have plugged in and turned on at home to watch the show.

Wasn't it Fax that had the highest viewing figures from the Championship on a fairly regular basis when it was under the Sky people?

I dont know if you were or not but you were very entertaining to watch under calland thats for sure,tho i bet, a little frustrating at times

Re: Fev for SL : Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:31 am  

Starbug wrote:

Probably , but that was when you played decent RL in 2011 BK

Yep, but the plan is to replay those games again as if it is now and hope no one notices.

Back to Fev, SL and Nahaboo.

There has been comments going around on the subject of what he see's at Fev that he didn't see at Fax as if there is something better with Rovers.

That may well be the case as he see's it but he not only had a dabble with Halifax but also Cas and Wigan.

No disrespect and it's just a cautious approach but does it not look strange that he would choose to plumb for Fev to spend these 6 and 7 figures sums.

What advantage does he see in Fev over the other clubs he has had some involvement in.

If he was that keen on rugby league and SL why did he not choose a club allready there and nearer to the top plenty to choose from who would have loved some cash injection.

What is driving this, the motive is always a key factor and I hope it's a good one.

Re: Fev for SL : Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:53 am  

freddies wig wrote:

Unlike Leigh

You're wrong there, pal. Last accounts to hand show over £30000 profit.

Re: Fev for SL : Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:01 am  

griff1998 wrote:

You're wrong there, pal. Last accounts to hand show over £30000 profit.

Weve never paid that much for Ridyard and Beswick surely