Re: Rumours from the Terraces : Wed Sep 21, 2016 4:13 pm
Bubba wrote:
The East Stand design was initially so big to satisfy the requirements of Super League - we all know there wasnt such a requirement for the Football League.
Yet you claim the improvements " Yes, which was in no way down to HRLFC."
It is fair to say that CMBC would not have completed the East Stand had it not been a shared stadium.
Yet you claim the improvements " Yes, which was in no way down to HRLFC."
The initial funding to get the stadium up to Football League and Super League standard came from the Football Stadium Improvement Fund and was not dependent on Fax being at the Shay.
Yet you claim "Yes, which was in no way down to HRLFC". Even though Fax were one of the ones sharing the stadium.
Keep bringing up the false claims and contradictions within your own posts and I shall keep on swatting them away
Yet you claim the improvements " Yes, which was in no way down to HRLFC."
It is fair to say that CMBC would not have completed the East Stand had it not been a shared stadium.
Yet you claim the improvements " Yes, which was in no way down to HRLFC."
The initial funding to get the stadium up to Football League and Super League standard came from the Football Stadium Improvement Fund and was not dependent on Fax being at the Shay.
Yet you claim "Yes, which was in no way down to HRLFC". Even though Fax were one of the ones sharing the stadium.
Keep bringing up the false claims and contradictions within your own posts and I shall keep on swatting them away