SL Poll : Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:37 pm  

...

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:41 pm  

some of them would like penky and maybe gleeson. maybe some more would but i havent decided yet.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:41 pm  

Three of four would. But the majority - no.

Dave Larder would piss that league though. You can bank on it.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:44 pm  

Said it before. Consitency is the key in super league. Championship clubs may be able to get "up" for a game and give a SL club a scare or even upset them but to do it every week is just a no go IMO.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:50 pm  

james haley i think would do a good job as well. he always seems to play well and always wins the short kick off every time he has got one awsome leap.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:52 pm  

Not if we were playing Saints no

However, playing Celtic, Salford and those other losers, oh what are they called? Ah yes Bradford. I reckon we would do ok

Guess we will find out at da Jungle next week

: Fri May 01, 2009 5:37 am  

a couple would do ok, others nowhere near standard.

: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am  

There's no doubt they'd give it their best, but a few wouldn't make the subs bench I'm afraid.

Dave Larder and Paul Smith wouldn't want SL, but I think three quarters of the team would be ok. Hull KR took most of their NL1 team into SL and just added a few, and look at them now. I recon this team is better than Hull KRs promotion year team.

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:48 am  

The Scratchin shed ghost wrote:

Guess we will find out at da Jungle next week

Agree, think that will be a good game to prove how well you guys could kick it in the top flight. CC w/end sure has some games that could go either way - spices it up more too!

: Fri May 01, 2009 6:52 am  

Not a chance. In attack we'd do reasonably well, but defence would let us down. SL is all about defence and you need a lot of well drilled (if not particularly talented) pieces of meat to take the line.