: Mon May 25, 2009 1:08 pm  

chissitt wrote:

There is many a true word spoken in jest if only it was. LIke I said the bitterness will eat you up.

Dont mind the jibes, no really its the fans on here what doesnt like the replies to the jibes. As for anti Cas stuff dont get ahead of yourself your not that important as the Wakey fans would want to discuss you.

Is that why there been specific threads on the Wakefield board about us then ?

: Mon May 25, 2009 1:38 pm  

Disco wrote:

I'm not here to 'help' you - I'm surprised you think I am.

Does that help?

I doubt that I will need any help from you and I am suprised that you think I do. HTH.

I have erased all your waffle in between on the grounds that I know nothing of what is going on regards Stanley and therefore refuse on that basis to get into a debate unlike yourself who is willing to make unqualified statements' about things you are totally ignorant of. I only know what I read in the papers and as I have said before I will believe it when the concrete is being poured, unlike your good self what seems to be going to great lengths to try and impress upon us that you know it all chapter and verse when I suspect you know didly but are intent on blagging your way through even though you are clueless. It would be interesting to know how you arrive at these facts thoughts Could it be that you are frightened to come to Stanley as you know deep down that no matter how you talk up GH its not going to happen. Keep up the good talk you never know keep on about it and one day you might believe it

: Mon May 25, 2009 1:44 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

Is that why there been specific threads on the Wakefield board about us then ?

For a level headed fair minded poster you are not being very fair here. Its there for all to see that there is 2 people what come on here to cause mischief and you know who they are and it is a bit unkind to lump all Wakey fans alike. You have your problem posters on here do we class you the same. no didnt think so.

: Mon May 25, 2009 1:55 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I doubt that I will need any help from you and I am suprised that you think I do. HTH.

I have erased all your waffle in between on the grounds that I know nothing of what is going on regards Stanley and therefore refuse on that basis to get into a debate unlike yourself who is willing to make unqualified statements' about things you are totally ignorant of. I only know what I read in the papers and as I have said before I will believe it when the concrete is being poured, unlike your good self what seems to be going to great lengths to try and impress upon us that you know it all chapter and verse when I suspect you know didly but are intent on blagging your way through even though you are clueless. It would be interesting to know how you arrive at these facts thoughts Could it be that you are frightened to come to Stanley as you know deep down that no matter how you talk up GH its not going to happen. Keep up the good talk you never know keep on about it and one day you might believe it

Yes of course, that's exactly what I said. How kind of you to completely cut it out and then replace my words with your own bullsh*t misinterpretion.

I would talk about things like commons sense and the balance of probabilities, but frankly it'd be utterly wasted wouldn't it?

: Mon May 25, 2009 1:56 pm  

chissitt wrote:

For a level headed fair minded poster you are not being very fair here. Its there for all to see that there is 2 people what come on here to cause mischief and you know who they are and it is a bit unkind to lump all Wakey fans alike. You have your problem posters on here do we class you the same. no didnt think so.

So what! some of us only post on our own boards

: Mon May 25, 2009 2:05 pm  

chissitt wrote:

For a level headed fair minded poster you are not being very fair here. Its there for all to see that there is 2 people what come on here to cause mischief and you know who they are and it is a bit unkind to lump all Wakey fans alike. You have your problem posters on here do we class you the same. no didnt think so.

You're a Wakey fan on the Cas board here for no other reason than to stir things up, that makes you fair game. You could all end it here and now by just f*cking off and stop spouting cr*p about what you think you 'know' about Castleford's plans. But you won't do that because you know as well as we do that without Cas you've got jack sh*t at Stanley or anywhere else.

: Mon May 25, 2009 2:11 pm  

Disco wrote:

You're a Wakey fan on the Cas board here for no other reason than to stir things up, that makes you fair game. You could all end it here and now by just f*cking off and stop spouting cr*p about what you think you 'know' about Castleford's plans. But you won't do that because you know as well as we do that without Cas you've got jack sh*t at Stanley or anywhere else.

quality

: Mon May 25, 2009 2:16 pm  

Disco wrote:

Yes of course, that's exactly what I said. How kind of you to completely cut it out and then replace my words with your own bullsh*t misinterpretion.

I would talk about things like commons sense and the balance of probabilities, but frankly it'd be utterly wasted wouldn't it

Is that a question or a statement?

: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm  

tigerbaz wrote:

So what! some of us only post on our own boards

If the cap fits wear it, assuming it doesnt drop off
I've seen you sneaking on the Wakey board before now

: Mon May 25, 2009 2:27 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Is that a question or a statement?

It was rhetorical.