Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:19 pm  

pyeman wrote: All that shows is that his missed tackle count and error count is appauling just like mcgoldricks, despite him being less pressurised as he is in a more dominant team that does less defending. ok check his stats to Paul 'safe as houses' Wellens http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010

pyeman wrote: All that shows is that his missed tackle count and error count is appauling just like mcgoldricks, despite him being less pressurised as he is in a more dominant team that does less defending. ok check his stats to Paul 'safe as houses' Wellens http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010

Re: richie mathers signs : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:20 pm  

Fully wrote:

Hopefully at centre.

If Shenton goes that leaves us bare in the centre with only Evans (injury-prone) and Arundel (young) to cover and Thompson covering centre too. Putting McGoldrick there and getting another centre in would be great.

Do you really think that is more likely to happen though?

We have one half back, most other teams have at least 3, but half backs are expensive, we know we are on a tight budget so why sign a fullback when we already have 3 players who play there (with owen and thomposon looking like naturals in the role) unless your using the signing to save money in other areas, ie not signing a scrum half.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:22 pm  

pyeman wrote:

All that shows is that his missed tackle count and error count is appauling just like mcgoldricks, despite him being less pressurised as he is in a more dominant team that does less defending.

Your continued inability to recognise a quality player is duly noted.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:23 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

Your continued inability to recognise a quality player is duly noted.

Your continued inability to display any intelligence whatsover is duly noted.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:24 pm  

Lawrie L wrote:

turnstyle

Correct.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:36 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

Your continued inability to recognise a quality player is duly noted.

and your continued ability to troll is duly noted

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:40 pm  

Wire_Yed wrote: ok check his stats to Paul 'safe as houses' Wellens http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010 That also means nothing. It's been fairly apparent for a number of seasons now, to everyone but Saints fans and yourself, that Wellens is absolute durge. FWIW, I think Mathers is an excellent signing for Castleford. His only real fault being his uncertainty under a high bomb, which a fullback of Wigan or Warrington's standard can't have in his game.

Wire_Yed wrote: ok check his stats to Paul 'safe as houses' Wellens http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010 That also means nothing. It's been fairly apparent for a number of seasons now, to everyone but Saints fans and yourself, that Wellens is absolute durge. FWIW, I think Mathers is an excellent signing for Castleford. His only real fault being his uncertainty under a high bomb, which a fullback of Wigan or Warrington's standard can't have in his game.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:51 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Your continued inability to display any intelligence whatsover is duly noted.

You really do have no other material do you?

But thank you Bottom for the contribution and doubtless will continue with your spurious, unfounded, dogmatic resonance for Mathers not being good enough for your outstanding organisation.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:55 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

You really do have no other material do you?

But thank you Bottom for the contribution and doubtless will continue with your spurious, unfounded, dogmatic resonance for Mathers not being good enough for your outstanding organisation.

Says the troll who has started his last 3 posts the same way

I dont want mathers at my club for one reason, i have seen him play.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:57 pm  

Speedy wrote:

and your continued ability to troll is duly noted

That's very good sweetheart well done. You've learnt "copying", tomorrow we can teach you how to use letters from the alphabet to construct your very own words and thoughts.