: Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:07 pm  

Code13 wrote:

Am I watching a different game or something, that kick went smack bang over the centre of the right hand post, a few feet lower and the post would be wobbling like crazy and this wouldnt even be a matter for discussion

Ganson gave Cas every chance to win and now you want him to have made up scores that didnt happen?

Come on.

in your opinion the majority say it went over but the officials didnt thats all that maters, as for ganson in what way hudds laid on all the game slowin it down and only in the last 1/4 did he send someone for it.
But we should have won its our own fault we didnt no excuses our fault

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:14 pm  

Giants were being penalised for things Cas were getting away with being the point

Still, Cas had enough ball and position to win the game and couldnt, end of story.

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 1:19 pm  

Code13 wrote:

Am I watching a different game or something, that kick went smack bang over the centre of the right hand post, a few feet lower and the post would be wobbling like crazy and this wouldnt even be a matter for discussion

Ganson gave Cas every chance to win and now you want him to have made up scores that didnt happen?

Come on.

Rightly so as well with the holding down that was going on which Huddersfield didn't get punished for nearly enough.

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:09 pm  

-Beth- wrote:

But what if it had of been the other way around?

same as when we comment on ref's decisions and just told to get over it?

Get over it

[tb]

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:16 pm  

Like most others - it looked over to me, from where I was stood in the Princess St stand. But it didn't to the touchies from where they were stood.

And like Binks said, they're the ones whose view counts.

And, we should have made the one-man advantage in the last 10 count. But we didn't - no complaint about the result.

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:28 pm  

We can't complain about the ref, look at the penalty count - we can't complain about the kick - we have only ourselves to blame, flat in attack for the best part, not putting the ball down properly for the Ferres try and the fact that Hudds defence was absolutely awesome for 80 mins, even with 1 man in the sin bin.

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:25 pm  

Code13 wrote:

sky+ shows it went over the upright

two touch judges who actually know the rules were in the perfect position to check and so was the ref, who can overrule the TJs

It's a shame they don't know the two feet behind the goal line rule!!!!!!

Not once did your left winger have both feet behind the line during the 2nd half.

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:42 pm  

Junglefever wrote:

It's a shame they don't know the two feet behind the goal line rule!!!!!!

Not once did your left winger have both feet behind the line during the 2nd half.

Wouldnt bother mate, every time cas have played hudds since iv been registered on here (2003) you trust in code 13 for the most biased one yed crap view of the match on here. Hudds have never done anything wrong deserve to win every game they play in and were better than the opposition *yawn*

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:57 pm  

No complaints from me ,Thats the luck of the draw as they saw ,ifs and buts can win any game If Ferres had held on to the ball ,If Ritchie Owen was a foot taller, if it wasn't windy we'd have had got to the 1st kick off etc etc
Fair play to the Giants defence a real tough nut to crack ,both teams are top eight certainties at the mo (wouldn't bother me in the slightest if the top eight consisted of all Yorkshire teams )

Delboy66(Aye of the tigers fanzine)

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:22 pm  

And all that with the second string pack.