: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:44 pm  

Disco wrote:

Spotted the typo there.

Its too funny to 'get over'.

Glad you did not want to change the bit about TMs childish tantrum

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:01 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

Its too funny to 'get over'.

Glad you did not want to change the bit about TMs childish tantrum

I thought I'd leave it in for the irony, given that Giants' fans starting a new thread about it weeks after the event hardly qualifies as soaring new heights of maturity.

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:52 pm  

Disco wrote:

I thought I'd leave it in for the irony, given that Giants' fans starting a new thread about it weeks after the event hardly qualifies as soaring new heights of maturity.

What is wrong with them enjoying themselves? Mature or otherwise.

But the head coach of a SL team having a tantrum in front ofthe press where the RFL find no case is infantile.

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:05 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

What is wrong with them enjoying themselves? Mature or otherwise.

But the ... yah di yah drivel ...

Jesus, you guys used to be okay y'know. One sniff of success and you're suddenly Yorkshire's Wigan.

Whatever, have your fun. Personally I don't have a problem with a coach being allowed to voice an opinion, whether it's thought to be right or wrong. TBH though I'm not all that interested in hearing what you lot think of it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Still when you've finished playing your crayons need putting away or there'll be no supper.

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:09 pm  

Disco wrote:

Jesus, you guys used to be okay y'know. One sniff of success and you're suddenly Yorkshire's Wigan.

Whatever, have your fun. Personally I don't have a problem with a coach being allowed to voice an opinion, whether it's thought to be right or wrong. TBH though I'm not all that interested in hearing what you lot think of it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Still when you've finished playing your crayons need putting away or there'll be no supper.

Don't forget though Disco, it was the Cas coach who said it, therefore it is the collective opinion of every Cas fan, everywhere and no other truth exists. That also means a trolling opportunity on the forum frequented by those fans as a means of recompense.

Er...

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:10 pm  

Disco wrote:

Jesus, you guys used to be okay y'know. One sniff of success and you're suddenly Yorkshire's Wigan.

Whatever, have your fun. Personally I don't have a problem with a coach being allowed to voice an opinion, whether it's thought to be right or wrong. TBH though I'm not all that interested in hearing what you lot think of it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Still when you've finished playing your crayons need putting away or there'll be no supper.

D.I.S.C.O

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:40 pm  

Snigger... Castleford stand-off Rangi Chase is free to extend his ever-present record after he was found not guilty of making a dangerous tackle in the Tigers' 68-22 defeat by St Helens.

Snigger... Castleford stand-off Rangi Chase is free to extend his ever-present record after he was found not guilty of making a dangerous tackle in the Tigers' 68-22 defeat by St Helens.

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:22 pm  

Disco wrote: Snigger... I think they're all too busy crawling back under their rocks..

Disco wrote: Snigger... I think they're all too busy crawling back under their rocks..

[Durham Giant]

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:26 pm  

Le Tigres wrote:

I think they're all too busy crawling back under their rocks..

WRONG.

So the arguement you are putting forward is that if the RFL look at something and find that person has no case to answer they are exonerated.

that sounds very reasonable to me.

So LOGICALLY when the RFL and stuart cummings, and the Sky team look at Huddersfield and find nothing wrong they are exonarated as well.

Except if you are Terry Matterson where you aer judge, Jury and executioner and do not let the facts get in the way.

: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:04 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

WRONG.

So the arguement you are putting forward is that if the RFL look at something and find that person has no case to answer they are exonerated.

that sounds very reasonable to me.

So LOGICALLY when the RFL and stuart cummings, and the Sky team look at Huddersfield and find nothing wrong they are exonarated as well.

Except if you are Terry Matterson where you aer judge, Jury and executioner and do not let the facts get in the way.

Will you let it go? I think we got over our relegations quicker than you have with Matterson and his personal opinions.