: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:03 pm  

Ah yes, I got Wakey and Bradford mixed up then.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:40 pm  

Not there? No Sky? Boy are you unlucky... Still, updates HERE

Not there? No Sky? Boy are you unlucky... Still, updates HERE

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:30 pm  

Why does our defence seem to fall apart as soon as we're under a bit of pressure? Shame that last score was scrubbed off, it'd have been a real boost going into the 2nd half.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:53 pm  

Sorry you lost.

Your guys seemed a bit mentally shot tonight? Making a few crazy decisions, not quite as on the ball as they usually are? It's a shame because I'm not entirely sure Wire deserved that win. There were three wrong decisions by the ref, which were all in Wire's favour, one of which caused a try. I'm not a Cas fan (except by proxy when you aren't playing us!) and I was shouting at the ref!

I hope your guys manage to get themselves back together again soon as they play great rugby when they've a mind to and deserve more wins. So long as they wait until after Friday to do it though, please!

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:55 pm  

We didn't help ourselves at times, but Cas were utterly caned for 20 minutes at the start of the second half (by that fantastic referee Ben Thaler) and that's when the game was effectively won. Draw your own conclusions.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:57 pm  

Disco wrote:

We didn't help ourselves at times, but Cas were utterly caned for 20 minutes at the start of the second half (by that fantastic referee Ben Thaler) and that's when the game was effectively won. Draw your own conclusions.

My conclusions are as follows:

Warrington have a pack.

Cas have Sargent and.. well, that's it.

And the team with a pack will always win.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:01 pm  

just_browny wrote:

My conclusions are as follows:

Warrington have a pack.

Cas have Sargent and.. well, that's it.

And the team with a pack will always win.

Yep, there's that..

I'd characterise the game more as Cas had flair while Wire had grunt. In the first half the difference was that their tries were up the middle - as a result they converted the easier extras and that was the only difference.

As I say, Cas didn't help themselves at times but I maintain they were utterly caned at the start of the second. The count went from 4-4 to 8-4 in Wire's favour within 8 minutes and (whether you agree they were fair or not) that pretty much guaranteed Wire would extend the half time lead. They did, twice, and that was the game right there.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:06 pm  

pyeman wrote:

I'm not looking forward to a big crowd from wolves alot of there fans are predicting our lowest gate of the season by a big margin (5800 was one of them!).

5,628 it was

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:10 pm  

Rugby wrote:

5,628 it was

Aye - an appalling figure for Cas. Hopefully that puts paid to any thought of regular Saturday evening games darn t'Lane.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:11 pm  

Rugby wrote:

5,628 it was

and you go on about the wakey support