Re: Mathers : Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:15 pm  

Frosties. wrote:

Any truth in Karl Pryce to you?

Heard this a couple of times know.

Re: Mathers : Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:25 pm  

Mathers has been getting a lot of questions asked about this on Twitter, most of which he is answering with "not for me to comment"

However, one in particular stood out, one where someone asked if him and Millward didn't get on and thats why rumours were rife about him leaving. Richie replied saying he had never even met Basil!!!

Re: Mathers : Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:29 pm  

pyeman wrote:

The problem with that theory is that if cas say to him you arent going to be playing he isnt going to want to be sat on the sidelines and putting his career in jeopardy, he will just ask for a release which he will get.

Depends on how stubborn he and the club are. By all accounts Cas need to shift part of his wage before bringing anyone else in so it would be damaging for them as well. An agreement will be reached and everyone will move on.

Re: Mathers : Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:45 pm  

binks wrote:

Well telling us the leaked email about naming rights was for the new stadium and that its was an error by a junior!! Getting Casforum to take down the liableous thread when it was true.

And wasnt Poskitt only bragging about "having to go to london for the Probiz do" only last Friday, and as for Ben Parker is there something going on between him and Gary Schofield ??

With regard to first paragraph, who confirmed that. No one knows the actual reasons, however, I would suspect the Casforum admin team.

As for Craig, I'm sure he did go to London. As for your third point, Garry Schofield is an ambassador/works for Wish Communications along with Ben?

Re: Mathers : Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:47 pm  

Wheres Gronk! with facts when ya need him?

Re: Mathers : Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:53 am  

I am not getting this thread at all, Richie Mathers is a decent bloke, family man, attracts no recreational attention anywhere in his personal life. He is pretty durable over his career and Leeds, Wigan, Wire and actually winners medals would suggest to me that he can play the game a bit - well put it this way I would love to be as crap as he is.

If we abso HAVE to offload someone for cash to fund something major, then I accept that we do have FB options. But genuinely a number of players who can play FB, Wing, Centre would seem to me to be a good place to be in. I love that this is a bash Mathers thread and all of a sudden Goldy is now not attracting any attention at all.

I would be shocked if Mathers went, especially in the way we are talking about on here. I think this is simply the season where there is so little rugby that people make things up.

Re: Mathers : Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:29 am  

While i think Owen can develop into a very good full back i feel sorry with how the club appears to have treated Mathers.

If the club hadn't have been stupid enough to have offered Hudson & Mcgoldrick those 4 year deals we wouldn't have found ourselves in this position

Re: Mathers : Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:36 am  

Frosties. wrote:

Any truth in Karl Pryce to you?

About 3 stone over weight and bone idle....i hope not

Re: Mathers : Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:13 pm  

mdean wrote:

I am not getting this thread at all, Richie Mathers is a decent bloke, family man, attracts no recreational attention anywhere in his personal life. He is pretty durable over his career and Leeds, Wigan, Wire and actually winners medals would suggest to me that he can play the game a bit - well put it this way I would love to be as crap as he is.

If we abso HAVE to offload someone for cash to fund something major, then I accept that we do have FB options. But genuinely a number of players who can play FB, Wing, Centre would seem to me to be a good place to be in. I love that this is a bash Mathers thread and all of a sudden Goldy is now not attracting any attention at all.

I would be shocked if Mathers went, especially in the way we are talking about on here. I think this is simply the season where there is so little rugby that people make things up.

Completely agree. I like Mathers, I think he has good organisational skills, something that you need from a full back. He is pretty solid and a safe bet.

However, with regards to your last paragraph, it seems from reading his tweets he isn't training with the squad at all and hasn't even met Millward at all. Youngquest is sticking up for him with regards to people saying he has thrown his teddy out of the cot stating "if only people knew how much you wanted to give"
Says it all for me

Re: Mathers : Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:27 pm  

mdean wrote:

I am not getting this thread at all, Richie Mathers is a decent bloke, family man, attracts no recreational attention anywhere in his personal life. He is pretty durable over his career and Leeds, Wigan, Wire and actually winners medals would suggest to me that he can play the game a bit - well put it this way I would love to be as crap as he is.

If we abso HAVE to offload someone for cash to fund something major, then I accept that we do have FB options. But genuinely a number of players who can play FB, Wing, Centre would seem to me to be a good place to be in. I love that this is a bash Mathers thread and all of a sudden Goldy is now not attracting any attention at all.

I would be shocked if Mathers went, especially in the way we are talking about on here. I think this is simply the season where there is so little rugby that people make things up.

Always seems a nice bloke when you read his articles but sentiment shouldn't come into running a rugby club (if it did we should have given wainwright a 5 year deal!). Milward see's owen as the clubs best fb(correctly imo) so he should play him there, the fact that mathers here because he wanted to be first choice fb has nothing to do with milward, milward should be able to build his own team and if he has decided that mathers is to expensive for cover or that he doesnt rate him he would be a poor coach not to try and offload him, especially when we have other areas (centre) that need to be strengthed.

Mcgoldrick and mathers both struggle with defence at fb, 1-1 tackles and high bombs they can make some real howlers with, mathers can organise the defensive line better, but goldy has more aggression and is better with ball in hand, if milward doesn't rate goldy he will be gone in a year anyway, but if he doesn't offload mathers but doesn't want to play him he is stuck with him for 2 more years. Whats more goldy is our hb cover a role that mather would probably struggle to fill.

I think mathers is already gone mate, he hasn't been training with the team and is refusing to comment on any rugby matters on twitter.