: Sat May 23, 2009 11:24 am  

[img]imagesource.php?image=3261.jpg&maxwidth=360&maxheight=261[/img]

Maybe if we find a few million this will become a reality but in the current financial climate I dont see this happening any time soon.

A new closer South stand would be good as a temporary measure as would the south extension to the East Stand of which I think will happen this close season. With any luck we'll still be in the SL for the next 5-10yrs and by the mid point of that time scale our ground could be close to completion.[/url]

: Sat May 23, 2009 12:29 pm  

10-5 wrote:

the behavior of around ten thugs leaving the stadium at the end of the match was disgusting.They were singing and chanting,which is fine,but when someone dared to say something back,they wanted a fight,shouted threats at the passing cars and behaved more like football hooligans.My ten year old daughter was quite frightened.

I think i saw that same group as we left the car park. They were a bunch of spunk fueled kids, acting the hard man and wanted to have a go at two KR lads (i'm guessing because they out numbered them by 5-1). As i got closer i noticed Mick Morgan have a word with them and tell them to clear off but when he left they carried it on. I then opened my car window and told them to stop being idiots and go home.

: Sat May 23, 2009 12:57 pm  

There were a few cas fans being ejected from the ground which is something i haven't seen in a while at CP, and that when we scored infront of the cas fans more than one bottle was thrown onto the pitch

: Sat May 23, 2009 2:43 pm  

willowred wrote:

There were a few cas fans being ejected from the ground which is something i haven't seen in a while at CP, and that when we scored infront of the cas fans more than one bottle was thrown onto the pitch

Two, apparently, vs half a dozen home fans (according to another thread). As for the bottle, I understand it was one bottle. When I passed my maths, one was not the same as 'more than one'*.

Still, we're scum us.

*(except for extremely large values of 1)

: Sat May 23, 2009 6:21 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

Im not whining fella infact if you read my post you will see that I only found one decision puzzling.
Cas played very well tonight and it was a tight game which could have gone either way until our last score with both defences on top.

same as me with that!!! penalty against fox for changing his line and pushing the cas winger into touch... penalty try in my book that was.

: Sat May 23, 2009 6:29 pm  

very red robin wrote:

same as me with that!!! penalty against fox for changing his line and pushing the cas winger into touch... penalty try in my book that was.

There is no way on gods green earth that should be penalty try as there were far too many things that could have gone wrong before he put the ball down
Could he have scorded it?, probably yes.
Was it certain?, Well for a start the Cas player could have dropped the ball, the ball could have taken a bad bounce, Fox could have had him in touch before grounding etc,etc all of that would have to be ruled as imposible (e.g the try would be scored for CERTAIN) for him to give a penalty try.
I suggest you stop asking Ben Thaler for your officiating tips.

: Sat May 23, 2009 6:41 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

There is no way on gods green earth that should be penalty try as there were far too many things that could have gone wrong before he put the ball down
Could he have scorded it?, probably yes.
Was it certain?, Well for a start the Cas player could have dropped the ball, the ball could have taken a bad bounce, Fox could have had him in touch before grounding etc,etc all of that would have to be ruled as imposible (e.g the try would be scored for CERTAIN) for him to give a penalty try.
I suggest you stop asking Ben Thaler for your officiating tips.

doesnt have to be a CERTAIN try as you put it, it has to be a CERTAIN clear oppertunity that he would get it, and it was.

as for the Thaler bit - get over it, we'll get him some time or other as have to deal with it on the pitch.

: Sat May 23, 2009 6:43 pm  

very red robin wrote:

doesnt have to be a CERTAIN try as you put it, it has to be a CERTAIN clear oppertunity that he would get it, and it was.

as for the Thaler bit - get over it, we'll get him some time or other as have to deal with it on the pitch.

Exactly, it only has to be a clear try scoring opportunity not they 100% must be able to score the try including will he keep hold of the ball?

If that was the case there would never be a penalty try.

: Sat May 23, 2009 6:47 pm  

Keep deluding yourselves fella's

: Sat May 23, 2009 6:51 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

Keep deluding yourselves fella's

Bearing in mind im a rovers fan, how am i deluding myself?