Re: FC Match Report now up... : Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:49 am  

Puig-Aubert wrote:

Could be 9 and retarded?

Kept down a class with the "special" kids you mean ?

Could be.

When I was at junior school my friends older bother (2 years older) ended up in our class after he'd been "kept down" twice rather than send him to Secondary school - as far as I know he's still at Cookridge CP, he'd be 55 years old now, probably sits at the back, still not listening.

Re: FC Match Report now up... : Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:51 am  

McLaren_Field wrote:

Any advances on 8 years old ?

25 and inbred????

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:43 am  

Ah, but try and guess which one of his seven fingers he clicked his mouse with!

I can hear his banjo from here..... de de dang dang ding

[Wheels]

Re: FC Match Report now up... : Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:19 am  

dano wrote:

what a load of boll8cks ,if the game was played to the rules only 1 team should have won HULL

dano and damo...

Too much of a coincidence that.

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:35 am  

What should be a be big concern is how our supposed top defense shipped 30 points against one of the worst teams in the league.

How we took our foot off the gas, instead of running in 50+

Why we had to spend the latter half of the second half defending for our lives, when we should have been comfortable on the scoreboard.

If Sinfield's kicking had an off-day ....

[Wheels]

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:56 am  

Is Sinfield still on that goalkicking hotstreak or did he miss against Bradford?

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:21 pm  

AdmiralHanson wrote:

What should be a be big concern is how our supposed top defense shipped 30 points against one of the worst teams in the league.

How we took our foot off the gas, instead of running in 50+

Why we had to spend the latter half of the second half defending for our lives, when we should have been comfortable on the scoreboard.

If Sinfield's kicking had an off-day ....

I thought that. We should have used it as an opportunity to gain points difference on Saints. They now have a better defence by 3 pts

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:21 pm  

Wheels wrote:

Is Sinfield still on that goalkicking hotstreak or did he miss against Bradford?

I think he missed against Bradford

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:22 pm  

good result, but the manner of the game is worrying. We gifted them 2 tries in the first half, and should have gone in 30-0 up. Second half we just sat back & let them have a go, with poor decision making and constantly getting ourselves penalised. Must improve, and quickly.

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:47 pm  

Tyke's/Rhinos No. 1 Fan wrote:

good result, but the manner of the game is worrying. We gifted them 2 tries in the first half, and should have gone in 30-0 up. Second half we just sat back & let them have a go, with poor decision making and constantly getting ourselves penalised. Must improve, and quickly.

We didn't just sit back.

We simply made the mistake of making that ridiculous subsititution of taking off Buderus and bringing on Diskin. YET AGAIN the whole momentum of the side suffers when this happens. It is no coincidence that we offered nothing whilst Buderus was off the field, and that once he came back on Hulls chance had gone.

If we proceed with this ridiculous selection for sentimental purposes, it will catch us out when it matters.

Whilst Buderus was on field a fantastic effort, especially with ball in hand. When he was off, a simply awful peformance, with the worst defensive effort of the year so far.