Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:09 am  

MjM wrote:

Nah, it's much easier doing a brain-dead pile onto the RFL and mis-spelling Hetherington's name.

I’d say the brain dead ones are the ones who fail to consider overseas players when allowing salary cap dispensation. Amateur.

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:56 am  

It's far from a brain dead pile on. It shouldn't be beyond the wit of the RFL to consider the OQ situation at the same time as the cap when drafting regs. Occurrences may be rare, but clearly have been considered likely enough to draft the cap dispensation rule. If it hasn't been considered that this may apply to an OQ player, and therefore the impact on said OQ then yes, it is amateur.

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:36 am  

YosemiteSam wrote:

It's far from a brain dead pile on. It shouldn't be beyond the wit of the RFL to consider the OQ situation at the same time as the cap when drafting regs. Occurrences may be rare, but clearly have been considered likely enough to draft the cap dispensation rule. If it hasn't been considered that this may apply to an OQ player, and therefore the impact on said OQ then yes, it is amateur.

Did you think of it when the first occuronce happened? It's only fairly recent that I can think of it happening, within the last couple of years as far as i know. If you thought of it did you say " what about quota players? why haven't they made provisions?"
If not, why not?

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:28 pm  

fair enough that nobody considered it, but why it's taking so long is amateurish.

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 1:28 pm  

LeedsLurch wrote:

Did you think of it when the first occuronce happened? It's only fairly recent that I can think of it happening, within the last couple of years as far as i know. If you thought of it did you say " what about quota players? why haven't they made provisions?"
If not, why not?

My point is, regardless of how frequently it has actually happened, the RFL has a policy to cover the cap aspect. But that policy doesn't address the OQ implications. So no one thought "what if the player involved is on the OQ?". I find that staggering, don't you? And yes, I did think how does it impact our quota spots, but didn't fret as I assumed (wrongly, as it turns out) the the RFL policy would provide clarity.

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:43 pm  

tad rhino wrote:

fair enough that nobody considered it, but why it's taking so long is amateurish.

Only reason I can think of is that they might need the clubs to approve it. No idea if that's right though

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:46 pm  

tad rhino wrote:

fair enough that nobody considered it, but why it's taking so long is amateurish.

Maybe they need to consult with lawyers, and that's never a quick process

Re: Transfer Talk V5 : Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:46 pm  

Clearwing wrote:

Only reason I can think of is that they might need the clubs to approve it. No idea if that's right though

It very possibly needs other club approval, most things in SL do. It may also be tied in with the RFL's agreements with the home office over quotas and visas. But nah I'm sure it's just incompetence.