: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:55 pm  

Watch Diskin get penalised for nothing again this week

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:47 pm  

hopie4ever wrote:

Watch Diskin get penalised for nothing again this week

When did this happen?

[Frosties.]

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:49 pm  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

When did this happen?

Just looked at your 2009 predictions HH, do you still think Wire will get that high

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:49 pm  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

When did this happen?

Castleford away last season in the game after the WCC, IIRC.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:56 pm  

Kallum Watkins' Left Boot wrote:

Just looked at your 2009 predictions HH, do you still think Wire will get that high

No but that's what I predicted so I dont see it as right to change it.

As I said I can now see a GF of Leeds vs Hull, Rovers or Hudds.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:57 pm  

tvoc wrote:

Castleford away last season in the game after the WCC, IIRC.

From what I remember the first 1 hit the chest and bounced up so it was a high tackle and the 2nd deffinately was.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:00 pm  

Not the way I remember it. The first one was entirely legal.

Being penalised unfairly maybe then contributed to the second immediately after on Korkidas where this time he was rightly penalised and went on to receive a 1 game ban at the judiciary.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:03 pm  

tvoc wrote:

Not the way I remember it. The first one was entirely legal.

Being penalised unfairly maybe then contributed to the second immediately after on Korkidas where this time he was rightly penalised and went on to receive a 1 game ban at the judiciary.

Although my memory is failing me today (and my ability to work out simple math) i'm sure that he made contact with the ball and the his arm bounced up to the face. Either way he still shouldnt have gone charging in to the next tackle like he did. Totally unproffesional.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:07 pm  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

Totally unproffesional.

Is this Bentham we're on about now or are we still discussing Diskin's legitimate first tackle which was not deserving of a penalty, no way and no how, again IIRC.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:16 pm  

tvoc wrote:

Is this Bentham we're on about now or are we still discussing Diskin's legitimate first tackle which was not deserving of a penalty, no way and no how, again IIRC.

But you are taught as kids to just get on with the game if the ref gives a "poor" decision. Now a guy who is payed a decent amount of money for playing the same game should know better than to try to "prove a point" in the very next tackle. Regardless of the decision.