Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:48 pm  

Old Feller wrote:

The other questions are:
How bad is Sinfield's injury?
How fit is Delaney?

Sinfield just looked like he had a bad knock or maybe a possible dead leg. Delaney looked unfit and very wary when taking the ball into contact.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:49 pm  

I watched it on tele, and you could see both sides were trying to exploit this ruling. Melbourne did exploit it more, but perhaps you should take your blue and yellow goggles off for a second before turning into a sore loser?

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:49 pm  

I'd say it was a great effort from melbourne with 6 key players missing, all being said was a cracking game, and no donald would not have scored those tries, watkins did well even to get close.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:49 pm  

If I'm honest I thought Leeds would get snotted tonight after the season so far, you didn't. At the end, they were unlucky not to have won, you played bloody great considering Sinfield was off so early. I feel disappointed for you, but cannot, and will not accept Silverwoods handling of the game.
It was crap, inconsistant, at times biased and overall, shocking.

I hope whoever got hold of the RFL at half time gave it both barrels, and again after the game -it spoiled it for Leeds end of...

(jeez a Wire saying that......but true.)

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:50 pm  

roger_r wrote:

AGREED... the question now is. would Scott have held on to take those chances..??

Its a mute question and maybe a pointless one with all due respect yes

we werent at full strength but neither were they.

The main point for me is that we competed for the full 80 mins and showed the NRL is NOT what some fekwits on here would have us all believe.

with a bit luck would have won it but its history now. Lets kick on and go for a 4th SL title.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:51 pm  

Silverwood was heard to say they are allowed more time to move when tackle completed when senior had his tantrum

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:52 pm  

back to back to back wrote:

so?

Who likes losing?

when melbourne were in posession the general theme from the ref seemed to be ''MOVE MOVE'' when leeds were in posession the general theme seemed to be ''let melbourne f*ck about for a few more seconds''

So it was the refs fault you lost?

I just love the fact that Leeds fans are complaining at Melbourne's lying on, which is exactly what Leeds do week in week out.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:53 pm  

DoubleAone wrote:

Great Game....it could have gone either way IMHO right down to the last few minutes.

We lost but it shows up some chumps on here who stated......

The NRL game is so superior.

Melbourne would wipe the floor with us.

The Ozzies werent really interested.

FEKWITS ALL

Indeed. Watkins will rue those missed chances, and Sinfield picking up than injury. Was too close to call till near the end, and I enjoyed the game. Would have had no problem congratulating either team on the win, since either would have deserved it for that defensive slogathon. FWIW I think Silverwood allowed them to lie on too much, but you lot normally have lying-on timed to perfection so I guess they applied your own tactics against you.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:53 pm  

Focus ST wrote:

Silverwood was heard to say they are allowed more time to move when tackle completed when senior had his tantrum

When it's a surrender tackle.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:55 pm  

Focus ST wrote:

Silverwood was heard to say they are allowed more time to move when tackle completed when senior had his tantrum

Yes but Senior had regained is feet and they were still messing him about..

but Senior should not have given the penalty away when we were in possession.