[Ex-Swarcliffe Rhino]

Re: Wigan H : Tue Jul 12, 2016 3:31 pm  

No, we're going to hopefully ruin as many teams days as we can before being dumped into the middle 8's.

Re: Wigan H : Tue Jul 12, 2016 3:55 pm  

Lilley has to be dropped after his performance last week.

Re: Wigan H : Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:58 pm  

Sir Kevin Sinfield wrote:

Lilley has to be dropped after his performance last week.

I agree he was poor but we looked better in terms of shape with an organiser out there, so its a tough call of who to start in the halves, we just need to make sure we play with two this time!

Keinhorst should start over Ablett and Achurch (or Ferres), he sured up our defines again when on last week, we need to pick players on form not reputation
Singleton was also good and could start at 13 over JJB, but is also useful as an impact player

Re: Wigan H : Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:17 pm  

Grimmy wrote:

Will you guys not be trying out youngsters with this effectively being a dead rubber for you and the middle 8s round the corner? Not trolling, genuine question

Nah, we want to be the 'going nowhere with nothing to play for, and then put's a spanner in the works of the trophy hunting team towards the end of the season' team.

We used to encounter it many times and it was irritating.

Hopefully you'll be irritated on friday night, but i'm not holding my breath.

Re: Wigan H : Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:38 pm  

FlexWheeler wrote:

Nah, we want to be the 'going nowhere with nothing to play for, and then put's a spanner in the works of the trophy hunting team towards the end of the season' team.

We used to encounter it many times and it was irritating.

Hopefully you'll be irritated on friday night, but i'm not holding my breath.

Wigan seemed to always beat us when they were rubbish so its time to return the favour

Re: Wigan H : Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:08 pm  

Sir Kevin Sinfield wrote:

Lilley has to be dropped after his performance last week.

Surely depends on if McGuire is fit to return.....if not then Lilley has to play otherwise we'd be c0cking about with the balance again.

leedsnsouths wrote:

Singleton was also good and could start at 13 over JJB, but is also useful as an impact player

Think Singleton could possibly start at 13 again the way McDermott was praising him post match however I'd like to see us line up like this in the forwards.....(if Ferres is fit we know he'll be picked)

Galloway - Segeyaro - Garbutt
Ferres - Ablett
Delaney/JJB

Cuthbertson - Singleton - Delaney/JJB - Achurch/Keinhorst

That way we could interchange players more naturally.... - The two starting props go off after 20/25 mins for Singleton & Cuthbertson.
- toss of a coin who starts at 13 between the two workhorse players, interchange them after 25/30 mins so they don't do silly extended minutes.
- leaves a 2nd rower to interchange with the starters. Achurch offers more in attack, Keinhorst better defender and provides cover for the backs.

However we'll probably see McDermott do that weird style of one prop off after 20 mins, sub him back on after 26 mins.

[Frosties.]

Re: Wigan H : Wed Jul 13, 2016 12:22 pm  

Briscoe
Watkins
Moon
Hall
Burrow
Galloway
Cuthbertson
JJB
Albett
Sutcliffe
Delaney
Singleton
Garbutt
Keinhorst
Achurch
Handley
Golding
Lilley
Segeyaro

Re: Wigan H : Wed Jul 13, 2016 12:41 pm  

Golding and Briscoe/Handley to miss out.

Re: Wigan H : Wed Jul 13, 2016 12:55 pm  

Not that it will make a difference to the team, probably. But what is the point in naming a 19 with 4 that would be playing wing in it? wouldn't we be better naming someone like Sam Hallas or someone to get the experience and feel a part?

Re: Wigan H : Wed Jul 13, 2016 1:22 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Not that it will make a difference to the team, probably. But what is the point in naming a 19 with 4 that would be playing wing in it? wouldn't we be better naming someone like Sam Hallas or someone to get the experience and feel a part?

Yeah I can't see why Golding is included unless they have a couple of injury doubts in the backs (or halves and Sutcliffe needs to switch there)